外國機構投資者持股比例對ESG資訊揭露之影響與其經濟效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：3.137.182.27

姓名

簡翊庭(Yi-Ting Chien) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

外國機構投資者持股比例對ESG資訊揭露之影響與其經濟效果
(The Impact of Foreign Institutional Investors′ Shareholding Ratio on ESG Information Disclosure and Its Economic Effects)

相關論文

★ 財務揭露語調與預測未來盈餘能力之關聯：以美國年度報告 10-K 為例

★ 機構投資者類型對ESG資訊揭露之影響與其財務效果

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-6-30以後開放)

摘要(中)

隨著全球經濟環境的日益複雜和企業對社會影響力的關注不斷增加，企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility，CSR)已經成為企業經營中不可或缺的一環。CSR不僅僅是企業履行對社會和環境的義務，更是一種經營策略，有助於提升企業的聲譽、吸引投資者、提高員工滿意度，以及創造長期價值。本研究旨在探討外國機構投資人持股比例是否會影響公司資訊揭露和其所帶來之經濟效果。
本研究蒐集台灣上市、櫃公司發布2014年到2023年永續報告書進行分析，藉由迴歸分析法來衡量它們與市場流動性和股權資金成本之間的關聯，並進一步分為距離遠近、自願或強制揭露、是否具有第三方機構確信，並探討外資總持股率是否會影響公司出具之永續報告書品質。而實證結果顯示，外資持股率越高，企業更傾向在永續報告書中詳細揭露，外資的監督作用能夠提升永續報告書揭露質量，降低企業的股權資金成本，以及提高價格影響及股票週轉率之影響，對於買賣價差無顯著影響。更進一步討論出外國機構投資人持股率越多對公司所發佈永續報告書品質之重複性及正負面詞語揭露具有正面影響，但對永續報告品質之可讀性具有負面影響，而對可驗證性則是有正面影響但不顯著。最後討論無論外資距離遠近，外資總持股率對永續報告書揭露分數均具有顯著正向影響，且這種影響在距離遠地區的外資持股更為顯著;在自願揭露情況下，企業的外資持股對揭露分數影響更為顯著;外資總持股率對永續報告書揭露分數無論在是否具有第三方機構確信下皆為正向影響。

摘要(英)

As the global economic environment becomes increasingly complex and companies focus more on their social impact, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become an indispensable part of business operations. CSR not only fulfills obligations to society and the environment but also serves as a business strategy to enhance corporate reputation, attract investors, increase employee satisfaction, and create long-term value. This study explores whether the proportion of foreign institutional investors′ shareholding affects corporate information disclosure and its economic effects.
The study analyzes sustainability reports published by listed and over-the-counter companies in Taiwan from 2014 to 2023, using regression analysis to measure their relationship with market liquidity and equity capital cost. It further examines the impact of distance, voluntary or mandatory disclosure, and third-party assurance on these relationships. Empirical results show that a higher foreign shareholding ratio encourages companies to disclose more detailed information in their sustainability reports. The supervisory role of foreign investors enhances the quality of these reports, reduces equity capital costs, and positively affects price influence and stock turnover rate, with no significant impact on bid-ask spreads. Further analysis reveals that a higher foreign shareholding ratio positively impacts the redundancy and positive/negative word disclosure in sustainability reports, negatively affects readability, and has no impact on verifiability. Finally, the discussion reveals that regardless of the distance, the overall foreign ownership has a significant positive impact on the disclosure scores of sustainability reports. This impact is more pronounced in foreign holdings from distant regions. Under voluntary disclosure conditions, the influence of foreign ownership on disclosure scores is even more significant. The overall foreign ownership positively affects the disclosure scores of sustainability reports, regardless of third-party assurance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 外國機構投資人
★ 企業社會責任
★ 市場流動性
★ 股權資金成本

關鍵字(英)

★ Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor
★ Corporate Social Responsibility
★ Market liquidity
★ Cost of Equity

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
致謝詞 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究目的 2
二、文獻探討 3
2-1 外國機構投資者對於企業揭露行為之影響 3
2-2 外國機構投資者對企業社會責任之影響 3
2-3 永續報告書與傳達重要價值資訊之關聯 4
三、研究設計 6
3-1 研究假說 6
3-2 研究資料來源 7
3-3 變數定義 9
3-4 實證模型 15
四、實證結果分析 16
4-1 敘述性統計分析 16
4-2 相關性分析 19
4-3 迴歸結果分析 22
外資持股比例與永續報告書揭露分數之關聯 22
外資持股比例和報告書分數與股權資金成本之關聯 24
外資持股比例和報告書分數與市場流動性之關聯 26
4-4 進一步分析 28
五、結論與建議 38
參考文獻 40

參考文獻

1.宋曜廷、張道行、洪嘉馡、陳茹玲 (2016)。文本可讀性指標自動化分析系統 3.0 (CRIE 3.0)。Sung, C., Chang, D., Lin, C., Hsieh, T., & Chang, S. (2016). CRIE 3.0: A readability analysis system for Chinese texts. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference and Workshop on Analyzing Crisis Communication (AC@SIGHCI), 12-17.
2.闕河士, & 陳俊成. (2005). 買賣價差會影響投資人的持有期間與股票報酬率嗎? 中山管理評論, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6160/2005.12.01
3.Investopedia. (2022). Calculating the Share Turnover Ratio. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shareturnover.asp
4.Great Circle Mapper. (n.d.). Retrieved June 27, 2024, from http://www.gcmap.com/
5.Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
6.Aggarwal, R., Klapper, L., & Wysocki, P. D. (2005). Portfolio preferences of foreign institutional investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(12), 2919-2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.09.008
7.Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
8.Balakrishnan, K., Billings, M. B., Kelly, B., & Ljungqvist, A. (2014). Shaping liquidity: On the causal effects of voluntary disclosure. Journal of Finance, 69(6), 2237-2278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12180
9.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51*(6), 1173-1182.
10.Beuselinck, C., Blanco, B., & García Lara, J. M. (2017). The role of foreign shareholders in disciplining financial reporting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(5-6), 558–592.
11.Beuselinck, C., Blanco, B., & García Lara, J. M. (2017). The role of foreign institutional investors in corporate governance: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 46, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.06.004
12.Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003
13.Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge′s point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48
14.Boubakri, N. (2016). The role of corporate governance in firm performance. International Review of Finance, 16(1), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12090
15.Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2016). Foreign institutional investment, ownership concentration, and corporate governance: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 124-149.
16.Bradshaw, M. T., Bushee, B. J., & Miller, G. S. (2004). Accounting choice, home bias, and U.S. investment in non-U.S. firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(5), 795-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00157.x
17.Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1
18.Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 237-333.
19.Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x
20.Cai, W., Lee, E., Xu, A. L., & Zeng, C. C. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility disclosure reduce the information disadvantage of foreign investors? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 34, 12–29.
21.Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR website reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 415-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278085
22.Chen, H.-L., Chen, C.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2014). The impact of earnings management on corporate innovation: A contingent perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 127-144.
23.Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: A note on levels of reporting, legitimacy, and the role of the state. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(2), 177-191.
24.Chueh, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2005). Bid-ask spreads and holding periods in the over-the-counter market. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 13(4), 627-640.
25.Deng, X. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 65-73.
26.Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
27.Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006
28.Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50778
29.Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50143
30.Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355.
31.Du, S., & Yu, L. (2021). The association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and readability and sentiment of CSR reports: Evidence from Fortune Global 500 companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04822-8
32.Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
33.Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.001
34.Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, p. 32.
35.Gay, E. H. (1968). A business and its world. New York: Harper & Row.
36.Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
37.Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797-1832. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm073
38.Hong, H., Li, X., & Zhu, X. (2019). Does foreign ownership reduce insider trading profits? Evidence from international data. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(3), 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.04.002
39.Huang, C. Y., & Kung, F. H. (2020). Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms′ information disclosure? International Journal of Business and Economics, 19(1), 29-47.
40.Ji, X., Ye, K., & Zhang, L. (2018). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 89, 486-495.
41.Kacperczyk, M., Sundaresan, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Foreign investors and firm liquidity: Evidence from cross-border acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(3), 651-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.011
42.Kacperczyk, M., Sundaresan, S., & Wang, T. Y. (2018). Do foreign investors improve market efficiency? Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1571-1595. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx093
43.Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement), 91-124.
44.Leuz, C., Lins, K. V., & Warnock, F. E. (2009). Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms? Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3245-3285. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn089
45.Li, H. (2019). Repetitive disclosures in the MD&A. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(7-8), 982-1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12405
46.Li, Y. (2017). Management disclosure repetition: Information or obfuscation? Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1125-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12174
47.Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, S. (2020). Foreign institutional investors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 101307.
48.Li, Z., Wang, P., & Wu, T. (2020). Do foreign institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? Evidence from listed firms in China. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12481
49.Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853-910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12487
50.Lin, Y., Liu, Q., & Zhang, C. (2023). The impact of corporate social responsibility on stock liquidity: The roles of media coverage and corporate operations. Journal of Financial Research, 46(3), 381-398.
51.Liu, C., Guo, D., & Yu, X. (2017). How do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 46, 334-352.
52.Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65.
53.Lundholm, R., Rogo, R., & Zhang, H. (2014). The use of numerical performance measures in communication with financial analysts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.002
54.Lundholm, R., Rogo, R., & Zhang, J. (2014). Enhancing the credibility of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The role of verifiability and comparability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), 51-75.
55.Luong, H., Moshirian, F., Nguyen, L., Tian, X., & Zhang, B. (2017). How do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), 1449-1490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000388
56.Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., Cheng, Z., & Kuo, C. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 36(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211407595
57.Rjiba, H., Saadi, S., Boubaker, S., & Ding, Y. (2021). The effect of annual report readability on equity cost: Evidence from French listed firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 60, 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2021.101328
58.Shao, L., & Xu, S. (2019). Do foreign institutional investors improve price efficiency? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 63, 101181.
59.Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
60.Tsang, A., Xie, W., & Xin, X. (2019). Foreign institutional investors and voluntary disclosure around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 89-110.
61.Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1966). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022736
62.Wang, Y., Hsieh, H. H., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: The role of readability. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.008
63.Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Do foreign institutional investors deter opportunistic insider trading? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101231.
64.Zeng, D., Liu, M., & Xie, F. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 379-397.

指導教授

曹壽民張東生(Shou-Min Tsao Dong-Shang Chang)

審核日期

2024-7-13

推文