電腦週邊業永續報告書環境面的文字採礦分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：40

、訪客IP：3.129.72.233

姓名

盧翊榕(Lu-Yi Rong) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

電腦週邊業永續報告書環境面的文字採礦分析

相關論文

★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析	★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性	★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究	★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素：以智慧節能裝置為例	★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性	★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析－以酒的消費為例	★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展：以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究：以第三方物流公司為例	★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢：以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析	★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究探討電腦週邊產業在永續報告書中的環境面文字採礦分析。透過分析企業的環境揭露，發現高水平的環境揭露可能會暴露不利訊息，影響企業聲譽，但有效的環境管理實踐可提高資源效率，減少污染和碳排放，從而改善經濟表現。我們強調環境揭露作為環境管理基礎的重要性，建議企業建立環境管理框架，通過分析輸入和輸出指標來控制和減少環境影響，達成永續發展目標。
過去企業將焦點放在經濟、環境和社會，且追求股東利益最大化。隨著環境與氣候的劇烈變化，ESG原則再度被提起，企業紛紛開始重視環境保護與主動公開揭露環境數據。本研究透過SAS文字探勘和文字主題的功能，以2023年總營收超過新台幣千億元的電腦週邊業企業為研究對象，探討2019至2023年間依GRI框架所編寫的永續報告書內容有關於環境面的重要指標與實際作為。
研究結果顯示，標竿公司的永續政策主軸圍繞著能源的使用、廢棄物的處理和供應商的管理。這些公司不僅誠實公開揭露環境數據，還積極履行企業社會責任，為環境保護作出貢獻。通過採用環保措施，這些企業不僅減少了對環境的負面影響，還提升了資源效率，實現了經濟效益與環境效益的雙贏。本研究強調了企業在永續發展中的重要指標以及對於永續環境的實際作為，促使其他企業一同跟進。

摘要(英)

This study explores text mining analysis of environmental aspects in sustainability reports within the computer peripherals industry. By analyzing corporate environmental disclosures, it was found that high levels of environmental disclosure might reveal adverse information that could affect corporate reputation. However, effective environmental management practices can improve resource efficiency, reduce pollution and carbon emissions, and thereby enhance economic performance. We emphasize the importance of environmental disclosure as the foundation of environmental management and suggest that companies establish an environmental management framework to control and reduce environmental impact through the analysis of input and output indicators, achieving sustainable development goals.
In the past, companies focused on economic, environmental, and social aspects, pursuing maximum shareholder interests. With the drastic changes in the environment and climate, ESG principles have been re-emphasized, and companies have started to value environmental protection and proactively disclose environmental data. This study uses SAS text mining and topic analysis functions, taking companies in the computer peripherals industry with total revenues exceeding NT$100 billion in 2023 as research subjects, to explore important indicators and actual practices related to environmental aspects in sustainability reports written according to the GRI framework from 2019 to 2023.
The research results show that the sustainability policies of benchmark companies revolve around energy use, waste management, and supplier management. These companies not only honestly disclose environmental data but also actively fulfill corporate social responsibility and contribute to environmental protection. By adopting environmental protection measures, these companies not only reduce negative environmental impacts but also enhance resource efficiency, achieving a win-win situation of economic and environmental benefits. This study highlights the key indicators in sustainable development and practical actions for a sustainable environment, encouraging other companies to follow it.

關鍵字(中)

★ 環境面
★ 永續報告書
★ 電腦週邊業

關鍵字(英)

★ Environmental aspects
★ Sustainability reports
★ Computer industry

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 3
第二章文獻回顧 5
第三章研究方法 8
3.1文字清理 9
3.2文字探勘 13
3.2.1概念連結分析 13
3.2.2主題分析 17
第四章研究分析 20
4.1 概念連結分析 20
4.1.1 2019年 21
4.1.2 2020年 24
4.1.3 2021年 27
4.1.4 2022年 30
4.1.5 2023年 34
4.1.6 趨勢分析 37
4.1.7 五年綜合分析 38
4.1.7.1 GRI 301原物料 41
4.1.7.2 GRI 302能源 42
4.1.7.3 GRI 303水資源 43
4.1.7.4 GRI 305氣體 44
4.1.7.5 GRI 305排放量 45
4.1.7.6 GRI 306廢棄物 46
4.1.7.7 GRI 306污水 47
4.1.7.8 GRI 307法規 48
4.1.7.9 GRI 308 供應商 49
4.1.7.10 趨勢分析 50
4.2 標竿公司環境面的概念連結與主題分析 51
4.2.1宏碁 52
4.2.1.1概念字的頻率分析 54
4.2.1.2主題分析 63
4.2.2 英業達 76
4.2.2.1概念字的頻率分析 78
4.2.2.2主題分析 87
4.2.3 光寶科技 93
4.2.3.1 概念字的頻率分析 95
4.2.3.2 主題分析 102
第五章結論與建議 109
5.1研究結論 109
5.2研究建議 112
第六章參考文獻 113

參考文獻

參考文獻
Alayón, C., Säfsten, K., & Johansson, G. (2014). Implementation of sustainable production principles within Swedish manufacturers. The 6th International Swedish Production Symposium 2014, Gothenburg, September 16-18, 2014.,
Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
Chen, C., Song, M., Chen, C., & Song, M. (2017). Text mining with unstructured text. Representing Scientific Knowledge: The Role of Uncertainty, 223-261.
Dahlmann, F., & Bullock, G. (2020). Nexus thinking in business: Analysing corporate responses to interconnected global sustainability challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 90-98.
ESG是什麼？ESG永續發展如何經營？6大策略教你如何實踐！. (2023). Retrieved June 21 from https://www.tejwin.com/insight/esg/
Eslami, Y., Dassisti, M., Lezoche, M., & Panetto, H. (2018). A survey on sustainability in manufacturing organisations: dimensions and future insights. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 5194-5214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1544723
Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32-33.
Gaughran, W. F., Burke, S., & Phelan, P. (2007). Intelligent manufacturing and environmental sustainability. Robotics and Computer-integrated manufacturing, 23(6), 704-711.
Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 17(5), 531-543.
IDC：明年全球筆電代工產業出貨量看增雙位數. (2023). https://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/news/newsviewer.aspx?a=a9fa6f24-90d7-4059-8cb4-2252ee0cd116
Jiang, J., & Qu, L. (2020). Evolution and Emerging Trends of Sustainability in Manufacturing Based on Literature Visualization Analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 121074-121088. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3006582
Kara, S., & Li, W. (2011). Unit process energy consumption models for material removal processes. CIRP annals, 60(1), 37-40.
Koplin, J., Seuring, S., & Mesterharm, M. (2007). Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry–the case of the Volkswagen AG. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12), 1053-1062.
Kumar, P., Sharma, D., & Pandey, P. (2022). Industry 4.0 (I4. 0) based virtual organization model for the coordination of sustainable textile supply chain. American Business Review, 25(1), 10.
Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global environmental change, 23(1), 382-391.
Lorenzoni, I., & Benson, D. (2014). Radical institutional change in environmental governance: Explaining the origins of the UK Climate Change Act 2008 through discursive and streams perspectives. Global environmental change, 29, 10-21.
Mason, M., & Mason, R. D. (2012). Communicating a Green Corporate Perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 479-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912448872
Naik, D. A., Mythreyan, S., & Seema, S. (2022, 27-29 May 2022). Relevance Feature Discovery in Text Mining Using NLP. 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET),
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2013). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 43, 85-91.
Perkiss, S., Anastasiadis, S., Bayerlein, L., Dean, B., Jun, H., Acosta, P., Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., Wersun, A., & Gibbons, B. (2020). Advancing sustainability education in business studies through digital service learning. American Business Review, 23(2), 283-299.
Rahman, N. (2020). Toward achieving environmental sustainability in the computer industry. In Waste Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1417-1431). IGI Global.
Rajemi, M. F., Mativenga, P. T., & Aramcharoen, A. (2010). Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1059-1065.
Ranjit Atwal, M. K., Tracy Tsai, Rishi Padhi, Namrata Banerjee, Rounak Bhattacharyya, Roberta Cozza, Divyanshu Singh. (2024). Forecast Analysis: PCs, Tablets and Mobile Phones, Worldwide. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/5397763
Rivera, S. J., Minsker, B. S., Work, D. B., & Roth, D. (2014). A text mining framework for advancing sustainability indicators. Environmental Modelling & Software, 62, 128-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.016
Saeli, H. (2019). An English-for-specific-purposes motivated analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(3), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-10-2018-0111
Shehata, S., Karray, F., & Kamel, M. (2006, 2006). Enhancing Text Clustering Using Concept-based Mining Model.
Shneider, A. M. (2009). Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Trends Biochem Sci, 34(5), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.02.002
Subbaraman, N. (2022). Carbon-Dioxide Level in Atmosphere Hits Historical High. https://www.wsj.com/articles/carbon-dioxide-level-in-atmosphere-hits-historical-high-11651777260?mod=Searchresults_pos7&page=1
Sukitsch, M., Engert, S., & Baumgartner, R. (2015). The Implementation of Corporate Sustainability in the European Automotive Industry: An Analysis of Sustainability Reports. Sustainability, 7(9), 11504-11531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70911504
Zhang, Z., Guan, D., Wang, R., Meng, J., Zheng, H., Zhu, K., & Du, H. (2020). Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nature Climate Change, 10(12), 1096-1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0895-9
Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023
李擇明. (2022). 企業永續發展策略探討——以台達電子為例 (Publication Number 2022年) 國立臺灣大學]. AiritiLibrary.
張書瑋. (2021). ESG企業永續報告書準備好了嗎？. 會計研究月刊(422), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.6650/arm.202101_(422).0010
賴言曦. (2024). 證交所：上市公司永續報告書申報時點改為8月底前. 經濟日報. https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/7744043
謝秉蓉, 陳建志, & 王銀杏. (2021). 台灣企業社會責任報告書揭露品質與企業價值之關聯性探討 [The Correlation Between the Quality of Disclosures in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports and Enterprise′s Value in Taiwan]. 管理與系統, 28(1), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.29416/jms.202101_28(1).0003

指導教授

沈建文(Shen-Chien Wen)

審核日期

2024-7-26

推文