使用者自定義之數位情境學習系統

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：174

、訪客IP：18.216.251.190

姓名

唐浩(Hao Tang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

使用者自定義之數位情境學習系統
(User-Customized Digital Situational Learning System)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

傳統的虛擬實境及擴增實境技術支持的學習系統雖然有助於營造情境化的學習環境，將抽象理論知識轉化為實際應用，然而現階段的學習系統大多由教師或系統開發者預先設計及掌控，使得學生感到學習過程與自身無關，學生只能被動地體驗及接收知識，缺乏主動探索的機會，違背了Papert的建構主義學習理論之教育理念。相對地，個性化學習環境強調學習內容應反映學生的興趣和偏好，並適應其生活經驗，從而促進學生達到期望的學習目標。然而，現有的數位實境在教育上的應用大多無法達成這一點，特別是在數位自我方面，數位化身的創建模式通常採用固定模板和有限的選項，使學生無法充分表達自我，難以在虛擬環境中建立心理連結，降低了他們在學習過程中的自我效能感和參與度。
因此，本研究設計了一個使用者自定義之數位情境學習系統，允許學生基於其自身的生活經驗和興趣，靈活擴展學習內容以及自由編排數位實境中的場景，並使用高度個性化的數位化身在自己設計的數位實境中進行學習，向同儕和教師展現自己的學習表現。實驗結果顯示，這種學習模式能有效增強學生對學習環境的心理擁有感，並對學生的學習動機和學習成效產生了正面影響。

摘要(英)

Traditional virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) learning systems, while helpful in creating contextualized learning environments and transforming abstract theoretical knowledge into practical applications, are mostly pre-designed and controlled by teachers or system developers. This makes students feel disconnected from the learning process, as they can only passively experience and receive knowledge without opportunities for active exploration. This contradicts Papert′s constructivist learning theory. In contrast, personalized learning environments emphasize that learning content should reflect students′ interests and preferences and adapt to their life experiences, thereby promoting the achievement of desired learning goals. However, most current applications of digital reality in education fail to achieve this, especially regarding digital self-representation. The creation of digital avatars usually follows fixed templates and limited options, preventing students from fully expressing themselves and establishing psychological connections in virtual environments. This reduces their sense of self-efficacy and engagement in the learning process.
Therefore, this study designed a user-customized digital contextual learning system that allows students to flexibly expand learning content and freely arrange scenes in the digital reality based on their own life experiences and interests. Students can use highly personalized digital avatars to learn in the digital reality they design, showcasing their learning performance to peers and teachers. The experimental results show that this learning mode effectively enhances students′ psychological ownership of the learning environment and positively impacts their learning motivation and outcomes.

關鍵字(中)

★ 建構主義
★ 情境認知
★ 心理擁有感
★ 虛擬實境
★ 擴增實境
★ 數位自我
★ 學習者自主性
★ 個性化學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Constructionism
★ Situated Cognition
★ Psychological Ownership
★ Virtual Reality
★ Augmented Reality
★ Digital Self
★ Learner Autonomy
★ Personalized Learning

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 XIII
一、緒論 1
1-1. 研究背景 1
1-2. 研究動機 3
1-3. 研究問題 3
1-4. 研究目標 4
二、相關研究 5
2-1. 建構式學習環境 5
2-2. 情境認知在教育上的應用 6
2-3. 數位化的情境學習環境 7
2-4. 心理擁有感在教育上的應用 8
2-5. 相關研究總結 11
三、以使用者為中心的設計 12
3-1. 學生之學習模式 12
3-2. 教師之教學模式 15
3-3. 系統設計理念 17
3-4. 系統解決辦法 19
3-4-1. 使用者自定義元素之生成 20
3-4-2. 實體空間與數位實境之同步 24
四、實驗設計 31
4-1. 實驗假設 31
4-2. 實驗對象 31
4-3. 實驗教材與環境 31
4-4. 實驗流程 33
4-5. 實驗評估 39
4-5-1. 施測工具－前後測驗 39
4-5-2. 施測工具－問卷 40
五、實驗結果與討論 41
5-1. 前後測試卷結果與討論 41
5-1-1. 共變數分析前提驗證 41
5-1-2. 共變數分析與結果討論 43
5-2. 問卷結果與討論 44
5-2-1. 問卷信度分析 44
5-2-2. 問卷結果描述 44
5-3. 訪談結果與討論 49
六、結論與未來研究 51
6-1. 結論 51
6-2. 未來研究 52
6-2-1. 數位實境之擁有感 52
6-2-2. 觀眾互動 52
參考文獻 53
附錄一、情境教材（對照組） 61
附錄二、情境教材（實驗組） 66
附錄三、前測試卷 71
附錄四、後測試卷 74
附錄五、實驗問卷 77
附錄六、論文關鍵字（英文版） 79
附錄七、圖表英文對照 85

參考文獻

林孟衡 (2023)。可融入使用者與實體物件之數位雙生實境學習系統國立中央大學資訊工程學系學位論文。
黃招憲、郭德信、王淑麗 (2005)。餐旅日語(上)。致良出版社。
黃招憲、許惠端、王靖絜 (2010)。餐旅日語(下)。致良出版社。
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), 438.
Ahmed, K., & Nasser, O. (2015). Incorporating iP ad Technology: Creating more effective language classrooms. TESOL journal, 6(4), 751-765.
Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 2, 522-560.
Andriyani, S., & Anam, S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between project-based learning and collaborative skills: EFL learners’ voices. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 7(1), 51-63.
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
Ayish, N., & Deveci, T. (2019). Student Perceptions of Responsibility for Their Own Learning and for Supporting Peers′ Learning in a Project-Based Learning Environment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 224-237.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 21(6), 34-47.
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(2), 229.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. 1989, 18(1), 32-42.
Buchem, I. (2012, January). Psychological Ownership and Personal Learning Environments: Do sense of ownership and control really matter. In PLE Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Chang, E., Kim, H. T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658-1682.
Chen, M.-R. A., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022). Effects of experiencing authentic contexts on English speaking performances, anxiety and motivation of EFL students with different cognitive styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1619-1639.
Chien, Y.-C. (2019). The Language of Massively Multiplayer Online Gamers: A Study of Vocabulary in Minecraft Gameplay. TESL-EJ, 23(3).
Chiu, C.-F. (2020). Facilitating K-12 teachers in creating apps by visual programming and project-based learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(1), 103-118.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge university press.
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101.
Coroller, S., & Flinois, C. (2023). Video games as a tool for ecological learning: the case of Animal Crossing. Ecosphere, 14(3).
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Harvester Wheatsheaf Hemel Hempstead.
Erbay, F., & Doğru, S. S. Y. (2010). The effectiveness of creative drama education on the teaching of social communication skills in mainstreamed students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4475-4479.
Falconer, L. (2013). Situated learning in virtual simulations: Researching the authentic dimension in virtual worlds. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(3), 285-300.
Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 6(1), 49-65.
Gómez, S., Zervas, P., Sampson, D. G., & Fabregat, R. (2014). Context-aware adaptive and personalized mobile learning delivery supported by UoLmP. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 47-61.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20-20.
George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Pearson Education India.
Girvan, C., & Savage, T. (2019). Virtual worlds: A new environment for constructionist learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 396-414.
Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 127-141.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. Learning with technology, 10.
Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning. ERIC.
Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2014). Avatar-driven self-disclosure: The virtual me is the actual me. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 20-28.
Hussein, B. (2021). Addressing collaboration challenges in project-based learning: The student’s perspective. Education Sciences, 11(8), 434.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Routledge.
Kettanun, C. (2015). Project-based learning and its validity in a Thai EFL classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 567-573.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.
Kou, Y., Shuai, Z., & Powpaka, S. (2021). The name effect in customization service: the role of psychological ownership and self-threat. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493-511.
Kucirkova, N. (2017). Digital personalization in early childhood: Impact on childhood (p. 224). Bloomsbury Academic.
Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual efl learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(2), 16-31.
Lan, Y.-J. (2020). Immersion into virtual reality for language learning. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 72, pp. 1-26). Elsevier.
Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269-308.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. Dublin, 86(11), 15-22.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Mao, Y., Tang, J., Wang, W., & Cheng, L. (2023, March). The Impact of Online Creative Classroom Environment on Students’ Creativity: A Case Study Based on Online Scratch Visual Programming. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 349-353). IEEE.
McCombs, B. L. (2008). From one-size-fits-all to personalized learner-centered learning: The evidence. The FM Duffy Reports, 13(2), 1-12.
Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Tancik, M., Barron, J. T., Ramamoorthi, R., & Ng, R. (2021). Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1), 99-106.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students′ interest, ownership, and motivation. The University of Texas at Austin.
Ni, M., Kwok, L. F., Zhen, L., Xie, Y., Long, H., Zheng, X., & Li, W. (2015). A study of an e-schoolbag supporting flipped classroom model for junior mathematics review class. In Hybrid Learning: Innovation in Educational Practices: 8th International Conference, ICHL 2015, Wuhan, China, July 27-29, 2015, Proceedings 8 (pp. 243-254). Springer International Publishing.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.
Nunan, D. (2014). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). Routledge.
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing Progress: Insights on Personalized Learning Implementation and Effects. Research Report. RR-2042-BMGF. Rand Corporation.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. In: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S. (1993). The children′s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism: research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Ablex publishing corporation.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of management review, 26(2), 298-310.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of general psychology, 7(1), 84-107.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & education, 147, 103778.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational technology, 36(3), 13-20.
Resnick, M. (1996, July). Distributed constructionism. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 280-284).
Rob, M., & Rob, F. (2018). Dilemma between constructivism and constructionism: Leading to the development of a teaching-learning framework for student engagement and learning. Journal of International Education in Business, 11(2), 273-290.
Romero, L., Saucedo, C., Caliusco, M. L., & Gutiérrez, M. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning and personalization using ePortfolios: a semantic approach based on learning paths. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1-16.
Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101802.
Schott, C., & Marshall, S. (2018). Virtual reality and situated experiential education: A conceptualization and exploratory trial. Journal of computer assisted learning, 34(6), 843-852.
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 33.
Sirisrimangkorn, L. (2018). The use of project-based learning focusing on drama to promote speaking skills of EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(6), 14-20.
Suh, K. S., Kim, H., & Suh, E. K. (2011). What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIs Quarterly, 711-729.
Sáez-López, J.-M., Miller, J., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Domínguez-Garrido, M.-C. (2015). Exploring application, attitudes and integration of video games: MinecraftEdu in middle school. Sáez-López, JM, Miller, J., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Domínguez-Garrido, MC (2015). Exploring Application, Attitudes and Integration of Video Games: MinecraftEdu in Middle School. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 114-128.
Sobral, S. R. (2021). Project Based Learning with Peer Assessment in an Introductory Programming Course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(7).
Steuer, J., Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication in the age of virtual reality, 33(37-39), 1.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2005). Constructionism: Student learning and development. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 259-267.
Turner, J., & Paris, S. G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children′s motivation for literacy. The reading teacher, 48(8), 662-673.
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
Vasiliene-Vasiliauskiene, V., Vasiliauskas, A. V., & Sabaityte, J. (2020). Peculiarities of educational challenges implementing project-based learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 136-149.
Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Kravcik, M., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2009). Personalisation of learning in virtual learning environments. In Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines: 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2009 Nice, France, September 29–October 2, 2009 Proceedings 4 (pp. 52-66). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024a). Augmented reality. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024b). Constructionism (learning theory). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024c). Digital twin. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024d). Ownership (psychology). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024e). Project-based learning. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024f). Personalized learning. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wikipedia contributors. (2024g). Virtual reality. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Investigating the learning‐theory foundations of game‐based learning: a meta‐analysis. Journal of computer assisted learning, 28(3), 265-279.
Xu, W., Wu, Y., & Ouyang, F. (2023). Multimodal learning analytics of collaborative patterns during pair programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 8.
Yang, F. C. O., Lo, F. Y. R., Hsieh, J. C., & Wu, W. C. V. (2020). Facilitating communicative ability of EFL learners via high-immersion virtual reality. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 30-49.
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285-312.
Yeh, Y.-L., & Lan, Y.-J. (2018). Fostering student autonomy in English learning through creations in a 3D virtual world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 693-708.
Yukselturk, E., Altıok, S., & Başer, Z. (2018). Using game-based learning with kinect technology in foreign language education course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 159-173.
Zhou, C., Kolmos, A., & Dalsgaard Nielsen, J. (2012). A problem and project-based learning (PBL) approach to motivate group creativity in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 3.

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2024-7-26

推文