參考文獻 |
1. PC NoteTaker.(n.d.), Retrieved June 27, 2006, http://www.pc-notetaker.com/.
2. Aleven, V.A.W.M.M. and Koedinger, K.R. An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26 (2), 2002. 147 - 179.
3. Anderson, T.H. and Armbruster, B.B. Reader and text: Study strategies. in Reading expository material, San Diego, 1982, 219-242.
4. Anderson, T.H. and Armbruster, B.B. Studying. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.). in Handbook of reading research, New York:Longman, 1984, 657-680.
5. Brotherton, J.A. and Abowd, G.D. Lessons learned from eClass: Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11 (2), 2004. 121 - 155.
6. Chastain, G. and Thurber, S. The SQ3R Study Technique Enhances Comprehension of an Introductory Psychology Textbook. Reading Improvement, 26 (1), 1989. 94-96.
7. Chuang, C.-H., Chao, P.-Y., Wu, H.-K. and Chen, G.-D. Integrated Textbook: Augmenting Paper Textbooks with Digital Learning Support Using Digital Pens. in Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06), 2006, 613-617.
8. Cox, K.E. and Guthrie, J.T. Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students' Amount of Reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26 (1), 2001. 116-131.
9. Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R. and Pearson, D. Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 1991. 239-264.
10. Gomez, L.M., Fishman, B.J. and Pea, R.D. The CoVis Project: Building a Large-Scale Science Education Testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6 (1&2), 1998. 59-92.
11. Hadwin, A.F. and Winne, P.H. CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7 (2&3), 2001. 313 - 334.
12. Hooper, S. and Hannafin, M.J. The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (3), 1991. 27-40.
13. Johnson, W., Jellinek, H., Leigh Klotz, J., Rao, R. and Card, S.K. Bridging the paper and electronic worlds: the paper user interface. in Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference on Human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, 507 - 512.
14. Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O. and Canny, J. Livenotes: A System for Cooperative and Augmented Note-Taking in Lectures. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005, 531 - 540.
15. Ljungstrand, P., Redström, J. and Holmquist, L.E. Webstickers:using physical tokens to access, manage and share bookmarks to the web. in Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments, Elsinore, Denmark, 2000, 23-31.
16. MacArthur, C.A. and Haynes, J.B. Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT): A Hypermedia Reading Aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28 (3), 1995. 150-159.
17. Mastropieri, M.A. and Scruggs, T.E. Best Practices in Promoting Reading Comprehension in Students with Learning Disabilities: 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18 (4), 1997. 197-214.
18. Miura, M., Kunifuji, S. and Sakamoto, Y. AirTransNote: An Instant Note Sharing and Reproducing System to Support Students Learning. in Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), 2007, 175 - 179.
19. Montali, J. and Lewandowski, L. Bimodal Reading: Benefits of a Talking Computer for Average and Less Skilled Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 (3), 1996. 271-279.
20. Namara, D.S.M.c., Levinstein, I.B. and Boonthum, C. iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (2), 2004. 222-233.
21. O'Hara, K., Smith, F., Newman, W. and Sellen, A. Student readers' use of library documents: implications for library technologies. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Los Angeles, California, United States, 1998, 233-240.
22. Rau, P.-L.P., Chen, S.-H. and Chin, Y.-T. Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors. Interacting with Computers, 16 (2), 2004. 163-181.
23. Repman, J. Collaborative, Computer-Based Learning: Cognitive and Affective Outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9 (2), 1993. 149-163.
24. Robinson, F.P. Effective study (4th ed.), New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
25. Ryser, G.R., Beeler, J.E. and McKenzie, C. Effects of a computer-supported intentional learning environment (CSILE) on students' self-concept, self-regulatory behaviour, and critical thinking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13 (4), 1995. 375-385.
26. Stifelman, L., Arons, B. and Schmandt, C. The audio notebook: paper and pen interaction with structured speech. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, WA, USA, 2001, 182-189.
27. Taraban, R., Rynearson, K. and Kerr, M. College students’ Academic Performance and Self-reports of Comprehension Strategy Use. Reading Psychology, 24 (4), 2000. 283-308.
28. Thomas, E.L. and Robinson, H.A. Improving Reading in Every Class. Boston: Alyn and Bacon, 1982.
29. Wenger, E. Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1987.
30. Whittaker, S., Hyland, P. and Wiley, M. FILOCHAT: handwritten notes provide access to recorded conversations. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 1994, 271 - 277. |