English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 72880/72880 (100%) Visitors : 23152483      Online Users : 460
 Scope All of NCUIR Engineering College    Graduate Institute of Civil Engineering       --Electronic Thesis & Dissertation Tips: please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise resultsplease goto advance search for comprehansive author search Adv. Search
 NCUIR > Engineering College  > Graduate Institute of Civil Engineering > Electronic Thesis & Dissertation >  Item 987654321/1081

 Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: `http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/1081`

 Title: 無腹筋RC梁利用壓拉桿模式預測剪力強度之研究;Analytical Study on RC Beams Without Steel Stirrups by Means of Strut-and-Tie Model Authors: 蕭乃維;Nai-Wei Hsiao Contributors: 土木工程研究所 Keywords: 無腹筋鋼筋混凝土;深梁;短梁;壓拉桿模式;shear strength;short beam;strut-and-tie model;deep beam Date: 2006-07-13 Issue Date: 2009-09-18 17:19:46 (UTC+8) Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館 Abstract: 根據ACI318-02，短梁是以剪力跨度a及有效深度d之比值作定義，當a/d 2.5則為短梁，反之則為長梁。對於其分析方法，規範是建議以壓拉桿模式來分析短梁，長梁以斷面剪力評估式作分析。本研究主要探討以壓拉桿模式作為分析短梁之適用性，除了應用於矩形梁外，另外也對T形梁作分析，藉以比較T形梁與矩形梁在分析上有何不同之處。 本實驗之試體針對不同之剪力跨深比a/d作設計，矩形梁與T形梁各5根試體，在剪力區內為無箍筋之設計。由實驗得知，無論矩形梁或T形梁，以壓拉桿模式作為短梁之預測剪力分析，其結果還算準確。由結果來看，T形梁在分析上與矩形梁最大不同處，在於T形梁多出了翼版之部分，因此在斷面分析時是考慮翼版寬度，並非梁腹寬度。此外，本實驗所採用的分析模式中，也探討了不同的壓桿軟化模式之影響，由結果得知，以本文所建立之模式做為短梁分析應屬合理。 According to ACI318-02, the behavior of deep beam is defined as the ratio of shear span to effective depth a/d 2.5. Strut-and-tie model analytical method can be adopted to the shear strength evaluation of the deep beams. The main purpose of the research is to see the validity of strut-and-tie model applied to analysis of rectangular and T-sectional beams. The comparison of analytical results between rectangular and T-section beams are discussed. Experimental works were made on testing five rectangle and five T-sectional RC beams, where no stirrup was used. Specimens were controlled by different shear span ratio, a/d. From the experimental result, the proposed strut-and-tie model for analyzing T-sectional and rectangle beams is fairly accurate. The largest difference in analyzing is that T-sectional beams have offered more discrepancy such as flange parts. However, the proposed model is more rational than previous researchers adopted using different softened strut-concrete behaviors. Appears in Collections: [Graduate Institute of Civil Engineering] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat