English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 59813/59813 (100%)
造訪人次 : 15759489      線上人數 : 233
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/3708


    題名: I-Line光阻劑於TFT LCD Array製程之應用及評估
    作者: 蔡文勇;Wen-Yung Tsai
    貢獻者: 化學工程與材料工程研究所
    關鍵詞: 微影製程;薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器;光阻劑;photoresist;photolithography;TFT LCD
    日期: 2006-04-13
    上傳時間: 2009-09-21 12:20:40 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 國立中央大學圖書館
    摘要: 有鑑於光阻劑的文獻上,大部分皆在探討半導體上之應用,關於光阻劑在TFT LCD上的相關文獻相當的少,因此決定本論文之研究方向以I-Line光阻劑於TFT LCD Array製程之應用及評估為主題。 本論文之研究目的,主要在於結合光阻劑製造商與TFT LCD面板製造廠,在於選擇及評估光阻上建立一個快速導入光阻評估的方法,並依此結論提供TFT LCD面板製造廠建立一個光阻評估的模式(Model)及方法,以縮短業者在光阻的評估及實驗上,以有效降低業者之成本。 本研究亦使用量產上的設備(如:光學薄膜測厚儀,光阻旋轉塗佈機,光學歩近式曝光機,顯影機…等),來評價A公司Resist A及T公司Resist B兩支光阻,以得到與TFT LCD面板製造廠最接近之研究結果,並將此最佳量產條件應用於TFT LCD面板製造廠,以縮短量產時間,並提升業者之競爭力。 本研究透過一系列之評估實驗:Spin Coater轉速、光阻塗佈均一性、Swing Curve、Smile Curve、Eth/Eop、曝光能量、顯影時間、Depth of Focus(DOF)、Adhesion、Side Etching…等,可以判斷出T公司Resist B及A公司Resist A兩支光阻,雖然皆適用於TFT LCD面板製造廠,但卻各有其優缺點。 A公司Resist A及T公司Resist B兩支光阻在本論文研究的總結如下,若在產能的考量下,則建議選擇使用A公司Resist A光阻,若在製程穩定性的考量下,則建議選擇使用T公司Resist B光阻。因此TFT LCD業者該如何選擇光阻,將以工廠之整體經濟效益、成本及利潤考量為主。 Regarding to researches of Photoresist, mostly these are related to the applications in Semi-conductor, but rare in “TFT LCD Array”. Owing to this, the thesis will be laid on the “Application, and Evaluation of I-Line Photoresist, applied in TFT LCD Array Process”. Mainly, the purpose of the research is to construct the efficient methodology, which is to evaluate new Photoresist, and to implement in the mass-production. With the cooperation of Photoresist and Panel makers, the conclusion has offered TFT-LCD maker(s) a new model (method) for the evaluation of Photoresist, which could shorten the evaluation procedure and reduce the evaluation cost. In order to secure the most similar experimental results to the realistic TFT-LCD Makers, the actual manufacturing equipments are utilized to evaluate these two Photoresist, respectively are “Company T Resist B” and “Company A Resist A”. The optimal production- parameters had been implemented by TFT-LCD maker, and contributed to the cost-down and competitiveness. The research is proved by a serious of evaluations: judged by the “Spin-Speed”,“Coating Uniformity”,“Swing Curve”, “Eth/Eop”,“Exposing Energy”,“Depth of Focus(DOF)”, “Adhesion”、and“Side Etching”, both“Company T Resist B”and ”Company A Resist A”could be adopted by TFT-LCD makers, but each shared their own merits. The research, which is related to Photoresist evaluation of “Company T Resist B”and ”Company A Resist A”, is concluded as that: Under the consideration of mass-production, “Company A Resist A” would be the better choice; if pursuing the stable process stability, “Company T Resist B” could show more excellent performance. Thus, for TFT LCD makers, how to choose the ideal Photoresist should depend on the Gross Economic benefits, Cost, and Profits of the whole Fab.
    顯示於類別:[化學工程與材料工程研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    0KbUnknown2721檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright © National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋  - 隱私權政策聲明