台灣公共工程施工履約爭議民事訴訟之研究-以可歸責於採購機關為核心; Quantitative and Visualized Interpretation of Public Works Civil Litigation Scenario of Fact Review in Taiwan

NCUIR > Engineering College > Graduate Institute of Civil Engineering > Electronic Thesis & Dissertation > Item 987654321/43270

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/43270

Title:	台灣公共工程施工履約爭議民事訴訟之研究-以可歸責於採購機關為核心;Quantitative and Visualized Interpretation of Public Works Civil Litigation Scenario of Fact Review in Taiwan
Authors:	吳銜桑;Hsien Sang
Contributors:	土木工程研究所
Keywords:	公共工程;施工履約爭議;民事訴訟;類目分析;對數線性模型;多元對應分析;Public Works;Construction Contract Disputes;Civil Litigation;Catagorical Analyses;Log-Linear Model;Multiple Correspondence Analyses
Date:	2010-06-23
Issue Date:	2010-12-08 13:32:49 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	國立中央大學
Abstract:	公共工程施工履約爭議處理，存在跨專業知識領域、研究素材取得與方法選擇等高度困難門檻，因此，既往研究鮮少符合統計檢定，多為局部片段敘述性結論，對於具體爭議個案無法一體適用。本研究普查迄至2008年的上一個十年間，台灣高等法院（分院）之公共工程民事訴訟判決，擇取其中凡有一部理由可歸責於採購機關訟案共400件。藉由類目分析、對數線性模型與多元對應分析方法，探索事實審判決相關變數之關聯，並以視覺化輔助數據解析，將超過數百萬言之判決主文，化約成單張二維圖像，並同步指認具備客觀意義之訟案，從而跨越以往直觀取材逕自微觀的研究障礙，填補未能符合科學定義的空白。本研究主要發現如下：一、類目分析結合對數線性模型與多元對應分析方法，化繁為簡的邏輯對於治絲益棼的工程法務研究證實具體可行。二、工程專業機關較易涉訟，較之於非工程專業機關相對高出51%。採購法施行對縮短訴訟時間具有貢獻，冗長訴訟耗時之勝算比大幅下降近5倍之多；且影響司法實務朝向抑制廠商投機行為，與促進採購機關法律經濟思維發展。三、一審判決上訴維持率存有地域上之差異，給付類於北部36.85%，中部24.65%，南部64.94%；賠償類於北部63.15%；中部75.35%；南部35.06%。 The construction dispute is an ancient issue, probably since the time of Hammurabi Code or even earlier. Nowadays, these issues have increasingly been a common social phenomenon in public works, and contribute to a major portion to legal practice. Existing studies regarding public works disputes and claims have drawn on small-scale cases to the exclusion of other cases and few have met the requirements of statistical tests. This study performs an investigation of a total of 400 cases of civil litigation in which owners lost their disputes in Taiwan High Courts and branches between 1999 and 2008. Category analysis coding is used to construct a Log-linear model for judgment decisions; this model is augmented by Multiple Correspondence Analysis to reduce judicial opinions of over 4 million words to a two-dimensional figure, allowing for visual interpretation and identifying specific cases for qualitative examination. The primary findings were: （1）the Government Procurement Law has contribute to shortening litigation times; （2）professional engineering agencies are easily involved in lawsuits, （3）the judgment affirmed of the First Instance review of court houses in different regions are different; （4）the social science methods provide a new channel for construction disputes research.
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Civil Engineering] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	669	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...