English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 67621/67621 (100%)
Visitors : 23101074      Online Users : 270
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/43663

    Title: 論胚胎是否具有生命權;Whether Human Embryos Have the Right to Life?
    Authors: 陳文珊;Wen-san Chen
    Contributors: 哲學研究所
    Keywords: 胚胎實驗;人工生殖技術;隱喻;胚胎;生命權;人格;墮胎;IVF;metaphor;right to life;embryo;personhood;abortion;embryo experiment
    Date: 2010-08-25
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 14:07:01 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 隨著人工生殖科技乃至於胚胎幹細胞等科學研究的日新月益,有關於胚胎之道德地位的討論,及其伴隨而來的相關倫理爭議,也逐漸白熱化。本論文藉由文獻研究及辨證之哲學方法,集中討論其中一主要論題,即胚胎是否是位格人,從而具有不容任意侵犯之生命權等道德與法律權益。在一方面檢視目前有關於胚胎位格人地位之支持與反對的論述,另一方面分析胚胎生物學之科學文獻中所使用的概念,及其倫理的相關性,本論文指出,「胚胎是位格人」的主張並非字面表達,而是隱喻,非僅如此,有關於胚胎的論述絕大多數更係由隱喻所構成,因而有必要從隱喻道德的進路,來釐清生命初始階段所涉及的變與不變,表現型的生成變化,與基因型的一致,究竟該如何加以隱喻地理解。此一研究典範的改弦異轍,從原則主義到隱喻道德,至少證明了一件事,那就是胚胎雖具有某些道德價值,得立法加以保障,卻不是位格人,不具有如同成人般嚴格意義的生命權。 With the rapid growth of new technologies in IVF and the embryonic stem cell research, the debate of the moral status of the early life has been brought into the forth front. This paper is going to focus on one of the vital issues, i.e. whether the embryo is a person with the right to life in terms of morality and law. After a detail survey and clarification of the pro and con of the crucial concepts, so called ‘the personhood of the embryo’, as well as ‘the right to life of the embryo’, and the related moral implications and reasons for or against them in both bioethical and scientific literature, this paper argues that these concepts and other discourse constituents of them are by no means literal but metaphorical ones. Therefore, it is in need to shift our ethical paradigm from the ethical principlism to the metaphorical morality, in order to know how can and should we metaphorically conceptualize and understand the changing phenotype and unchangeable genotype of the early stage of the human life. At last, this paper concludes with one statement, that is, although the embryo is with some moral significance, allowable to grant some protection and respect by the regulations of law in terms of specific contexts and needs, it is not a person, nor with right to life in a strict sense.
    Appears in Collections:[哲學研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明