English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 80990/80990 (100%)
造訪人次 : 41634770      線上人數 : 2242
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/49211


    題名: 清初程朱《易》學研究(Ⅰ)—刁包《易》學研究;Study of Cheng’S and Zhu’S Yijing Learning in the Early Qing Dynasty Part One on Diao-Bao’S Yijing Learning
    作者: 楊自平
    貢獻者: 中國文學系
    關鍵詞: Diao-Bao Yi –Zhuo in the early Qing Dynasty Cheng and Zhu Yijing learning;研究領域:語文
    日期: 2011-08-01
    上傳時間: 2012-01-17 18:00:46 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 行政院國家科學委員會
    摘要: 本計畫屬於清初程朱《易》學研究的一部分。經學史多認為清初《易》學屬程朱學,然對於該時期程朱《易》學之特色,並未明確說明。筆者研讀晚明及清初諸家之《易》著後發現,清初《易》學家並非僅墨守程朱《易》,而是既關注程朱《易》,且能留意明儒研究程朱《易》的成果。故筆者以為可視清初《易》為明《易》的延申,而清初《易》的成果又為其後的清儒所承繼。本計畫所關注的刁包便合乎這樣的標準。刁包《易酌》援引許多明儒的說法,尤其是蔡清《易經蒙引》、焦竑《易筌》的說法,亦大量引述、論析晚明黃道周、何楷、高忠憲等人的說法。刁包《易酌》除了關注程朱《易》外,亦關注明代《易》學的成果;而刁包《易》說亦多保留於清代王又僕《易翼述信》一書,成為清《易》探析的對象。因此,研究刁包《易》學有三點意義,其一,可藉此見出清初程朱《易》的不同表現;其二,可藉此檢視明代義理《易》學的發展;其三,可藉此掌握晚明《易》至清代《易》學的發展。此正是本計畫之研究動機所在。 This study focuses on a particular section of Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning in the early Qing Dynasty.Most scholars and historians of classics think Yijing learning in the early Qing Dynasty has much to do with Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning; nevertheless, they hardly explain what are the characteristics of Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning. After studying the works of Yijing learning of the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty, we can see that scholars in the early Qing Dynasty don’t stubbornly embrace the thoughts of Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning. Instead, they not only pay attention to Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning, but are aware of the results of Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning interpreted by the Confucian scholars duringthe Ming times. Therefore, their studies not only extend the scholastic context in Yijing learning from the Ming Dynasty but also become the sources for the descendants in the Qing Dynasty. It is Diao-Bao that meets such a criterion. Diao-Bao’s Yi –Zhuo cites perspectives from scholars of the previous Dynasty, most of all Cai-Qing’s Yijing- Mengyin and Jiao-Hong’s Yi-Quan. He also analyzes statements of Huang-Daozhou, He-Kao and Gao-Zhongxian, etc. Yi –Zhuo features Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning, and the results of Yijing learning in the Ming Dynasty. Much of Diao-Bao’s reflection is maintained in Wang-Youpu’s Yiyi-Shuxin, which makes him discussed by many Qing scholars. Studying Diao-Bao’s Yijing learning manifests three key points. First, different interpretations about Cheng’s and Zhu’s Yijing learning are shown in the early Qing Dynasty. Second, it helps scrutinize the development of Hermeneutics of Yijing learning during the Ming Dynasty. Third, it helps grasp the transition of Yijing learning from the late Ming Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty. And this is the reason why this study is conducted. 研究期間:10008 ~ 10107
    關聯: 財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
    顯示於類別:[中國文學系 ] 研究計畫

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML589檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明