趙彥肅（1147-1196），字子欽，建德人，學者稱復齋先生。《宋元學案》載其人私淑陸象山，並謂象山之學於甬上最盛，甬上之西，嚴陵亦一大支；而嚴陵之為陸學者，實自先生始，故復齋雖非親炙象山，但對陸學之傳播實具重要意義。復齋與朱子亦時有書信往來，《四庫全書總目》謂其所著《廣雜學辨》、《士冠禮》、《士昏禮》、《饋食圖》等書，皆為朱子所稱，惟論《易》與朱子不合，謂其「為說太精，取義太密，或傷簡易之趣」。今觀朱子所論，蓋意味其書過於簡易，鋪陳不足，故不易讀，所評並非負面。此一現象，在追隨象山的學者之中，實屬罕見。而《復齋易說》一書，即象數以求義理，對漢儒象學之利用尤多，與當時象山弟子如楊慈湖說《易》者不盡相同；且其所論義理，與心學之關係是否緊密相連，亦值得進一步探究。本計畫嘗試呈現南宋心學學者研究《易》學的另一面向。在趙復齋精密簡易的文字詮解之中，如何借由漢儒的升降、納甲、五行等象數，演繹《易》中義理，並與象山的思想關聯。 Zhao Yansu ( Ziqin, 1147-1196), a native of Jiande in Zhejiang Province, was entitled Mr. Fuzhai by scholars. It is said that he venerated and studied personally Lu Xiangshan’s scholarship. According to Songyuan xuean, he began to disseminate Lu Learning to Yanling and made a large branch besides the west of Ningbo, the most prosperous in Lu’s district. He was really significant to spread out Lu Learning in the period of South Song. Fuzhai was correspondent with Zhuxi as often. Siku quanzhu zongmu recorded that Zhuxi highly appreciated Fuzhai’s works except his Yijing ‘s commentary. However, Zhu’s remark was not negative, even though he appointed Fuzhai’s annotation less elaborate and not easy to read. This phenomenon is rare among Lu scholars. It is different from Yang Cihu, an important disciple of Lu, that Fuzhai explained the meaning of Yijing with diagrams and numerology, derived from Han dynasty. The relationship, as a result, between Lu Learning and Fuzhai’s interpretation is worthy of further investigation. This project aims to show a specific dimension of the study of Yijing in South Song. Through Fuzhai’s commentary in precision, we are able to understand how to annotate Yijing with diagrams and numerology such as Subsuming Heavenly Stems, Five Elements, Rise and Fall, as well as to be connected to Lu Learning. 研究期間：10008 ~ 10107
