English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 65318/65318 (100%)
Visitors : 21586670      Online Users : 766
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50602

    Title: Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration
    Authors: Hsieh,SY;Lee,CT
    Contributors: 應用地質研究所
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-03-27 17:37:40 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: This study employs strong-motion data from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake, the 1999 Duzce earthquake, the 1995 Kobe earthquake, the 1994 Northridge earthquake and the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake to refine the relationship among critical acceleration (A(c)), Arias intensity (I(a)), and Newmark displacement (D(n)). The results reveal that, as expected, logD(n) is proportional to logI(a), when A(c) is large. As A(c) gets smaller however, the linearity becomes less. We also found that logD(n) is proportional to A(c), and that the linearity is very stable through all I(a) values. These features are common to all six sets of data. Therefore, we add a third term in addition to the Jibson's form which covers the aforementioned problem, and propose a new form for the relationship among I(a), A(c) and D(n). Two alternative forms were tested using each of the six data sets, before a final form was selected. The final analyses grouped the data into a worldwide data set and a Taiwanese data set Coefficients for the selected form were derived from regression with the data, and two final empirical formulas, one for global, the other for local, proposed. Site conditions are also considered in this study with empirical formulas being developed for soil and rock sites, respectively. The estimation error is smaller and the goodness of fit is higher for both the local soil-site and rock-site formulas. Since landslides are more likely to occur on hillsides, the rock site formula may be more applicable for the landslide cases, whereas the soil site formula should be used for side slope of landfills. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Appears in Collections:[應用地質研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明