人與「此在」─現象學於謝勒與海德格之變奏與轉化;Person and Dasein: The Variation and Transformation of Phanomenology by Scheler and Heidegger

NCU Institutional Repository > 文學院 > 哲學研究所 > 研究計畫 > Item 987654321/61998

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/61998

题名:	人與「此在」─現象學於謝勒與海德格之變奏與轉化;Person and Dasein: The Variation and Transformation of Phanomenology by Scheler and Heidegger
作者:	孫雲平
贡献者:	國立中央大學哲學研究所
关键词:	哲學
日期:	2014-03-11
上传时间:	2014-03-11 14:40:22 (UTC+8)
出版者:	行政院國家科學委員會
摘要:	研究期間：10308~10407;Following my serial studies of exploring to the sources of Heidegger’s thought, this project tries to examine the influences of Scheler’s philosophy on Heidegger’s thought. Aside from the phenomenological method offered by Husserl and the content of ontology and teleology of Aristotle, the earlier contemporary Scheler had influences upon Heidegger’s philosophy. As for my personal primary understanding, besides his more substantial inspiration of phenomenological methodology than Husserl’s, Scheler also provided the essential implications to Heidegger’s, namely, to treat the concrete person as the subject matter of phenomenology, instead of Husserl’s phenomenology’s core, “consciousness”. Moreover, Scheler’s influence included the converting Heidegger from the adviser of his dissertation, Rickert, as well as the Neo-Kantianism of epistemological approach to the focusing on emotion and situation of man [Dasein, in Heidegger’s term] as the primordial way to understand and perceive the life world and things in the environment. However, there exist some divergences between them which mainly lie in the following: Heidegger did not agree with the naming his philosophy as philosophical anthropology. He regards his philosophy as fundamental ontology of Dasein; that is, he thinks that his philosophy is based on ontology, rather than no matter what kind of anthropology, psychology, or ethics…etc. Starting from the new moments and approaches that Scheler and Heidegger poured into the phenomenology’s development after Husserl and are distinguished from Husserl’s, this study thus tries to explore the relation between Scheler’s and Heidegger’s thought, the commonness and differences of the both.
關聯:	財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
显示于类别:	[哲學研究所] 研究計畫

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	580	检视/开启

在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

数据加载中.....