不╱好讀過去：女性主義知識分斷;Il/legible Pasts: Divisions in Feminist Knowledge

NCU Institutional Repository > 文學院 > 英美語文學系 > 研究計畫 > Item 987654321/62799

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/62799

题名:	不╱好讀過去：女性主義知識分斷;Il/legible Pasts: Divisions in Feminist Knowledge
作者:	丁乃非
贡献者:	國立中央大學英美語文學系
关键词:	語文
日期:	2013-12-01
上传时间:	2014-03-17 12:03:37 (UTC+8)
出版者:	行政院國家科學委員會
摘要:	研究期間：10208~10307;This two-year project begins with the post-nineties emergence of an “international feminism” (Barlow), “cultural feminism,” (Ghodsee) and “cold war feminism” (Yoneyama) as subjects of an autocritique on the part of US feminist historians and literary and cultural critics, as well as its counterparts in transnational NGO feminisms in East Asia (Ho). The rise of “international feminism” as discourse and phenomenon in late eighties US, is a moment of consolidation of feminism as institutional cultural force in the academe but also in law, amidst critiques from “women of color,” postcolonial, and queer critics. The focus of the first year’s research will read and analyze this US based auto-critical discourse on international feminism, and consider its disarticulation with a concurrent US foreign policy rhetoric advocating military interventions abroad in the name of freedom. In the first year I will focus on researching the relations and correspondences between a nineties US-emanated international feminist discourse with, on the one hand, its preceding “small wars” in the eighties US (including the “sex wars”), and on the other, its conjunction with, in the nineties, a new discourse and vision of a “liberal empire” or an “American empire” in the making. In the second year, I will read and contrast select works from Carolyn Steedman, Tani Barlow, Hu Taili, and Josephine Ho among others, in order to cull alternative methods that overcome or otherwise resolve the knowledge impasse in a global media analytic of patriarchy’s relation to sexuality enabled by international feminism’s methodological US nationalism. Steedman and Barlow provide differently vectored historiographic models of reading, while Hu and Ho traverse social sciences, humanities, ethnography, and the literary to bridge a gap between im/possible futures and il/legible pasts.
關聯:	財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
显示于类别:	[英美語文學系] 研究計畫

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	530	检视/开启

在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

数据加载中.....