人與「此在」─現象學於謝勒與海德格之變奏與轉化;Person and Dasein: The Variation and Transformation of Phanomenology by Scheler and Heidegger

NCUIR > College of Liberal Arts at National Central University > Graduate Institute of Philosophy > Research Project > Item 987654321/62812

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/62812

Title:	人與「此在」─現象學於謝勒與海德格之變奏與轉化;Person and Dasein: The Variation and Transformation of Phanomenology by Scheler and Heidegger
Authors:	孫雲平
Contributors:	國立中央大學哲學研究所
Keywords:	哲學
Date:	2013-12-01
Issue Date:	2014-03-17 14:04:01 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	行政院國家科學委員會
Abstract:	研究期間：10208~10307;Following my serial studies of exploring to the sources of Heidegger’s thought, this project tries to examine the influences of Scheler’s philosophy on Heidegger’s thought. Aside from the phenomenological method offered by Husserl and the content of ontology and teleology of Aristotle, the earlier contemporary Scheler had influences upon Heidegger’s philosophy. As for my personal primary understanding, besides his more substantial inspiration of phenomenological methodology than Husserl’s, Scheler also provided the essential implications to Heidegger’s, namely, to treat the concrete person as the subject matter of phenomenology, instead of Husserl’s phenomenology’s core, “consciousness”. Moreover, Scheler’s influence included the converting Heidegger from the adviser of his dissertation, Rickert, as well as the Neo-Kantianism of epistemological approach to the focusing on emotion and situation of man [Dasein, in Heidegger’s term] as the primordial way to understand and perceive the life world and things in the environment. However, there exist some divergences between them which mainly lie in the following: Heidegger did not agree with the naming his philosophy as philosophical anthropology. He regards his philosophy as fundamental ontology of Dasein; that is, he thinks that his philosophy is based on ontology, rather than no matter what kind of anthropology, psychology, or ethics…etc. Starting from the new moments and approaches that Scheler and Heidegger poured into the phenomenology’s development after Husserl and are distinguished from Husserl’s, this study thus tries to explore the relation between Scheler’s and Heidegger’s thought, the commonness and differences of the both.
Relation:	財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Philosophy] Research Project

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	603	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...