English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 66984/66984 (100%)
Visitors : 23006403      Online Users : 100
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/65341


    Title: 論納斯邦(Martha C. Nussbaum)的動物正義論:動物倫理爭議的解決;On Martha C. Nussbaum’s Theory of Animal Justice:A Solution for Animal Ethical Controversy
    Authors: 王萱茹;Wang,Hsuan-ju
    Contributors: 哲學研究所
    Keywords: 納斯邦;能力進路;動物倫理;分層思考;憐憫之情;正義;道德原則;Nussbaum;capabilities approach;animals ethics;levels of thinking;compassion;justice;moral principles
    Date: 2014-07-25
    Issue Date: 2014-10-15 15:28:14 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 本文主要闡述納斯邦的「能力進路」,說明彼如何透過此觀點,為動物建立必須受到保障的基本權益。本文進一步透過重新建構及修正納斯邦的論述,解決此理論所具有的缺失,亦同時解決動物倫理學中的各項爭議。在論題討論方面,主要分為三個部份。第一、納斯邦缺乏由「能力進路」而來的說明,用以解決「人類與動物之間的能力發展衝突」,直接得出動物必須受到犧牲之結論,是這個論述的最大缺失;第二、由於納斯邦取消傳統社會契約論的基礎,諸如:理性與協議的概念,導致「能力進路」在社會契約論中的定位模糊不清;第三、不論是辛格的「效益主義」與雷根的「權利觀點」,都不免犯下「實然-應然問題」,而此問題是動物倫理學中長久以來的爭議。本文對這三方面的議題提供一一的解答。

    本文主要透過提出「分層思考」解釋模式,作為展示及解決上述三大問題的方向。在第一個論題部份,透過若干中層的「道德原則」作為能力進路之具體化,用以解決倫理爭議的依據;其中,就「尊重生命原則」、「不傷害原則」及「仁愛原則」之詮釋,確立能力進路尊重並促進所有個體的能力發展,並且不傷害具有感知能力的生命;而「能力分層原則」及「生命價值序列原則」,則是透過能力的重要性以及生命價值序列的高低,做為解決衝突的依據。其他諸如「人道原則」與「修正原則」等等,則是作為補充的說明。藉由這些原則的建構,能力進路得以確實解決各種動物倫理議題,包括實驗動物與經濟動物之倫理問題。在第二個論題的部份,則是藉由修正「契約協議」的原理,援用史坎龍(Thomas Scanlon)的「他人無法合理拒絕的理由」,作為消解能力進路在社會契約論的定位模糊之問題。在最後一個論題的部份,則是透過對於道德根源的探究,即納斯邦的道德情感之論述中作為價值根源之「憐憫之情」,作為解決「實然-應然問題」之基礎。本文透過這些觀點的論述與說明,不僅使納斯邦的論述更臻於完善,亦解決動物倫理學中的各項爭議。
    ;This dissertation explores Nussbaum’s capabilities approach and shows how she establishes the basic entitlements of animals with this approach. In this dissertation, I try to point out the shortcomings of Nussbaum’s theory. In due course, it is reconstructed and revised and a number of important issues in animal ethics are resolved. My dissertation concerns with three main issues. First, I find that Nussbaum did not provide a clear discourse from capabilities approach to solve the conflicts between humans and animals in their respective capabilities development and she suggested that animals need to be sacrificed for human interests. This is clearly unsatisfactory. Second, since Nussbaum dismissed the foundational conceptions such as rationality and social agreement of traditional theory of justice, the relation of her capabilities approach with the contractarian tradition is somewhat vague and unclear. Third, the long time dispute of “is-ought problem” in animal ethics, which not even renowned theories of Singer’s and Regan’s could escape, and a solution for this problem is proposed.

    In this thesis, I employ the model of “levels of thinking” to deal with these three issues. For the first problem, I try to construct and employ certain mid-level moral principles in order to arrive at a proper and justifiable way for the solution of the conflicts of capabilities development between human and animal. The three main principles are respect for life, non-maleficence and beneficence. They imply that we have to respect and protect the development of capabilities of all individuals especially those sentience ones. While the principle of differentiation of levels of capabilities and the principle of comparison of order of life values are the basic principles for the solution of conflicts. Moreover, the principle of humanity and the principle of revisability provide additional explanations to help solve possible conflicts. With these principles, the capabilities approach could indeed solve animal issues like experimental animals and animal farm factory. Besides clarifying some of the vague points of Nussbaum’s theory, I elaborate Thomas Scanlon’s idea of “others could not reasonably reject” to fortify its position. Finally, I re-interpreted the Nussbaum’s idea of compassion and using it as the source of morality in order to solve the “is-ought problem”. As a result, it makes Nussbaum’s theory more capable to solve various issues of animal ethics.
    Appears in Collections:[哲學研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML610View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明