English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 73032/73032 (100%)
Visitors : 23189011      Online Users : 526
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/68596

    Title: 台灣矽晶太陽能產業競爭策略其技術創新發展因素之探討-應用模糊層級分析法
    Authors: 蕭榮吉;Hsiao,Rong-ji
    Contributors: 高階主管企管碩士班
    Keywords: 太陽能產業;競爭策略;技術創新;模糊層級分析法
    Date: 2015-07-23
    Issue Date: 2015-09-23 12:53:12 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 摘要
    The purpose of this study is construct competitive strategies for technology innovation of Taiwan silicon solar industry, and the development of industrial management plan. The fuzzy AHP to construct the technology innovation award factors and questionnaire analysis right selection factors of weight, further to find the right key development programs. Research results as follows:
    1. The establishment of competitive strategy selection hierarchical structure
    Three dimensions were "production scale", "product and technology development," "degree of industry consolidation" and six secondary objectives were “incremental scale", "fixed size", "diversity", "centralized", "a high degree of integration", "low degree of integration", twelve assessment criteria are "plan of expansion (push)", "expansion of demand (pull)", "fixed yield, quality improvement," "given quality, increase yield," "forward-looking research and development (pull) "," niche research and development (push) "," the former R & D program (pull) "," R & D needs (push) "," one-way integration (up or down) ""bidirectional integration (upper and lower)," "product items cut", "separation of departments" ,three strategic plan for the "self-development / build", "outsourcing / M & A," "strategic alliance"
    2. The dimensions weights and cross assessment criteria weight for sorting
    The dimensions weights are "production scale" is the first, the second is "product and technology development," "degree of industry consolidation" ranked last. The relative importance of cross-dimensions, the "plan of expansion (push)" is the highest, "forward-looking research and development (pull)" for the second, third is "demand of the expansion (pull)", last one is "the separation of departments."
    3. Solar Industry Competitive Strategy weighting scheme results
    "Self Development / build" and "strategic alliance" solution for the most commonly used, and "outsourcing / M & A" non-program their scores were the lowest points.
    Keywords: solar energy industry, competitive strategy, technology innovation, fuzzy AHP
    Appears in Collections:[高階主管企管(EMBA)碩士班] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明