English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 74010/74010 (100%)
Visitors : 24678430      Online Users : 233
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/69340

    Title: 兩晉士風之省思與評論;On the Reflection of the Ethos of the Jin’s Intellectuals and Discussion
    Authors: 梁建峯;New,Chien-hong
    Contributors: 中國文學系
    Keywords: 兩晉;士風;清談;隱逸;出仕;家族;任誕;Jin Dynasty;The Ethos of Intellectuals;Pure Conversation;Seclusion;Being an official;Family;Being Dissipated and Unruly Behavior
    Date: 2016-01-25
    Issue Date: 2016-03-17 18:19:34 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 歷來對兩晉士人的評價多是負面,有者甚至認為他們是最具人格缺陷的群體。然而,若將他們所處的時代環境加以考慮,具以同情之理解來看待他們的行止,便會發覺其實未必然。本文題為「兩晉士風之省思與評論」,「省思」即視察與思辨之意。通過晉人對自己浸染於彼時風尚下之切身感受所作出的思考與反應,參以後人對他們的考察與評論,由此省察他們的思考與言行。全文主要就兩晉之清談玄風、出處顯隱及任誕風潮三者為研討重心。全文共分五章:
    ;Evaluation of the Jin Dynasty intellectuals always more negative, there are those who even think that they were the groups with most personality disorder. However, if we consider their environment of the era, with the sympathetic understanding, we will find that those critics could be reevaluated. This study on the reflection of the ethos of the Jin’s intellectuals and discussion focuses on pure conversation, living in seclusion or being a scholar-official, and being dissipated and unruly behavior. The study is divided into five chapters as follows:
    The first chapter is an overview of the ethos of intellectuals and political environment during Jin dynasty, as the background of discussion on the study in the following chapters and the revision to this topic, which include the elaborations of study’s field.
    The second chapter, the Discussion on Pure Conversation. The ethos of Late-Han’s intellectuals and the origin of the pure conversation are carried out to clarify the differences of political criticism, pure conversation and metaphysical talks. Meanwhile, also to explore the trend of reflection on pure conversation discussion from Jin’s intellectuals, to examine the statement about pure conversation was sabotage the national interest.
    The third chapter is the Discussion on being a hermit or a scholar-official. First, sort out the history of seclusion in Chinese tradition in two main forms: the seclusion of Taoism and Confucian. The research will take the example of Ji Kang and Ji Xi brothers, analyze their choice of being a hermit or a scholar-official could suffer as a result of political coercion. And also dissertating on the paradox situation of Ji Shao, who is Ji Kang’s son, with the death of his father caused by emperor of Jin yet served as a Jin’s scholar-official.
    The fourth chapter is the Discussion on Being Dissipated and Unruly Behavior of Jin’s Intellectuals. To study wherefore nineteen dissipated Jin’s intellectuals were recorded in the History of the Jin Dynasty. They did not refuse to be a scholar-official even they belief in Taoism’s seclusion, hereby to highlight the relationship between the dissipated Jin’s intellectual and the rulers.
    Chapter five is the conclusion, summarizing the whole study and dissertation of the Jin’s intellectuals in Chinese history, as well as the limitations of the study.
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明