現行公務員停職制度分散於多部法令，導致法律適用出現混亂的情形，本論文主要是透過學者之期刊著作及彙整實務見解，採文獻分析法，從中整理我國公務員停職制度。本論文首先概要介紹我國公務員停職制度性質，並討論「留職停薪」等其他與停職處分相近之規定，以便瞭解停職處分立法必要性，進而介紹各部法令對於停職處分規範之要件。 其次，筆者透過整理實務見解，瞭解停職處分之作業流程，及於救濟時經常發生之爭議問題，進而檢驗權責機關作成停職處分是否符合正當法律程序。第三，停職處分對公務員權利造成影響，現行制度仍有不足之處，筆者將整理爭議問題，提出檢討，俾瞭解現行停職制度是否尚有缺漏之處。最後，筆者將針對104年5月20日公務員懲戒法修法前，關於復職規定之爭議問題進行檢討，以期瞭解104年5月20日修法後是否仍有不足之處，進而針對整個停職制度提出修法建議。 ;The work suspension of public servants can be seen in relating orders, acts and laws, which leads to ambiguity. The compatibility of the suspension laws of public servants leaves room to be discussed. This thesis employs Document Analysis to compile practical opinions through scholars’ journals, books and periodicals to comb out the existing suspension system of public servants in Taiwan. In the beginning, this thesis introduces the nature of the work suspension of public servants and then deals with the similarities between unpaid furlough and work suspension so as to figure out the necessity of making suspension laws. Besides, this dissertation also explains the principles of work suspension.Secondly, the author illuminates the procedures of work suspension and problems caused by administrative remedy through collected practical opinions. In addition, the author scrutinizes whether the work suspension is in conformity to legal procedures.Thirdly, the author addresses what impact the work suspension has on the rights of public servants and points out the defects of the current suspension system. Meanwhile, the author states the controversy which the suspension system brings and then offers suggestions.Lastly, the author discusses the controversy of reinstatement before the amendment of 2015.05.20 Public Functionaries Discipline Act and examines the defects after the amendment of 2015.05.20 Public Functionaries Discipline Act. In conclusion, the author proposes opinions about the amendment of the work suspension of public servants.