English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 70588/70588 (100%)
Visitors : 23129331      Online Users : 606
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/7906

    Title: 相同教學單元之創意作品所著重創意觀點與創意呈現之比較-以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例;Creativity of work institute emphatically creativity viewpoint and the creativity the same teaching unit present the comparison - take " The Math Creative Pedagogic Contest " the work as an example
    Authors: 趙中平;Chung-Ping Chao
    Contributors: 數學研究所
    Keywords: 創意競賽;創意教學;數學科創意教學;勾股定理;Creative competition;Creative teaching;Pythagorean theorem;Mathematics creative teaching
    Date: 2007-06-22
    Issue Date: 2009-09-22 11:08:43 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract:   由國家科學委員會科學教育處與國立中央大學數學系合辦的『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』,舉辦五屆以來,獲得了超過250件創意作品的熱情參與和支持,其中有許多相同教學單元的創意作品,熱門的單元更是多達10件以上。而在累積了這些同單元的創意作品之後,我們不禁想問,對一個相同的教學單元,各參賽教師所著重的教育目標是什麼;各參賽教師要如何展現他們的創意;他們所設計的創意是否真的能引發學生學習動機或培養學生創造力?本研究以比較相同教學單元(勾股定理)的創意作品為起點,藉由『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』所得的寶貴資料,嘗試分析每位參賽教師對於相同教學單元所著重的教學重點有什麼不同,以及每位參賽教師要如何展現他們的創意。並期望能藉由整理、分析其餘參賽教師所給予每份創意作品的評價與改進建議,能提供站在第一線的教師們在製作此教學單元的教材時,有個參考的依據。更期望能擷取出所有創意作品的優點,製作出一份具有創意的單元教材。 “The Math Creative pedagogic Contest” was pooled by the national science Council scientific education department and the National Central University Math department. Since the contest has exhibit for five sessions, which has attract and support by many participants, and these participants are school teachers. Therefore the contest obtains 250 surpass creative works, and there have over 10 popular units form these creative works. After accumulating these creative works from different units, people would ask themselves questions from the same teaching unit what is their main gold toward education? How do these participants reveal their creativity? Does teachers’ creative design can initiated students’ motivation to study or help students cultivate their creation? This research paper is based on compare the creative works in the same teaching unit (Pythagorean Theorem) and the valuable sources are from “The Math Creative Pedagogic Contest”. Try to analyze each participant’s main points and the difference from the same unit; as well as, analyze how these participants reveal their creativity. From the analysis and organization of this research paper hope that can improve teachers’ teach skills and give suggestion to their creative works. This proposal provides teachers other sources when they are preparing their teaching materials. Hopefully, it can combine all the advantages of these creative works and make another creative teaching material.
    Appears in Collections:[數學研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明