English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 67621/67621 (100%)
Visitors : 23023174      Online Users : 45
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/8099


    Title: 運用高頻資訊補償之超解析度演算法研究;High Frequency Compensated Super-Resolution Algorithm
    Authors: 張書梵;Shu-Fan Chang
    Contributors: 通訊工程研究所
    Keywords: 影像重建;超解析度;反投影迭代;影像內插;高解析度;image interpolation;image reconstruction;super-resolution;high-resolution;Iterative Back Projection
    Date: 2007-10-08
    Issue Date: 2009-09-22 11:18:05 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 時至現今,已有許多重建高解析度影像的方法。這些方法主要是去除影像經內插放大時的模糊效應和適當的增加空間上的資訊,以還原其高解析度的面貌。在本研究的方法中,藉由迭代反投影法(Iterative Back Projection, IBP)的原理,並加入高頻補償模型,依據應用的不同,發展出直接高頻補償(Direct High Frequency Compensated, DHFC)和估測高頻補償(Estimated High Frequency Compensated, EHFC)兩種方法。 本論文所提的方法,除了大幅改善零次,雙線性,和三次立方等,傳統內插法所放大的影像品質外,主要在於改善IBP演算法的缺點。在一般影像測試的情形下,DHFC方法可提升約1~5.7倍的速度,並提升最終PSNR值約0.1~0.3dB;EHFC方法可提升約1~6.5倍的速度,並提升最終PSNR值約0.4~0.7dB。在文字影像測試的情形下,EHFC方法可提升約1~6.5倍的速度,並提升最終PSNR值約1.2~8.3dB。 Currently, there exist many high resolution image reconstruction methods. The approach of these methods is mainly to remove the blur effect of image by interpolation enlargement and appropriately to increase the space information to restore its high resolution images. In this study, two methods, the Direct High Frequency Compensated (DHFC) and the Estimated High Frequency Compensated (EHFC), are developed based on the Iterative Back Projection (IBP) principle as well as the High Frequency Compensated Model. These methods substantially improve the image quality of reconstructed images enlarged by zero, bilinear, and bi-cubic interpolations. In addition, they accelerate the process significantly compared to IBP algorithm. In natural imaging test situation, DHFC method can increase the speed by 1~5.7 times and improve the ultimate PSNR value by 0.1~0.3dB while EHFC method can increase the speed by 1~6.5 times and improve the ultimate PSNR value by 0.4~0.7dB. Moreover, in text imaging test cases, EHFC method can increase the speed by 1~6.5 times and improve the ultimate PSNR value by 1.2~8.3dB.
    Appears in Collections:[通訊工程研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    0KbUnknown1116View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明