| 摘要: | 摘要
要成功地塑造一名優秀的法律人，有賴於法學教育的薰陶及長時間的訓練與
栽培。而我國目前面臨法律人與社會脫節之問題，法律系師生如何因應社會對法
律教育之期待，讓法律人能有效解決社會的正義問題？目前大家對於過去或現在
法學教育所培育出來的律師或司法官不甚滿意，因此要求改革。
本研究以法律系師生之觀點來探討我國法學教育對於法學教育之學制、教材
內容、國家考試以及法學教育與其他專業領域之整合能力闕如等現況進行分析，
同時參考美國、德國、日本三國的法學教育制度提出改革方式。
本研究以發問卷給法律系師生方式，進行量化數據分析，針對我國目前法學
教育之現況提出建議與改革看法，對於法學教育之學制、教材內容、國家考試以
及法學教育與其他專業領域之整合能力闕如等現況，多數師生都認同應就現況進
行改革。
最後，本研究針對問卷調查結果獲得以下結論：
在教學方面本研究發現大學法律系的課程中使用案例教學法的比例佔六成
最多，並有助於法學知識的學以致用。針對教材部分，各校教授應針對課程教材
重新設計或對教學方法重新進行改善已進行法學教育之改革，以彌補法學教育理
論與實務之差距，同時學校應開設律師或法官倫理之課程。另外，有關法學教育
學制設計改革問題，我國法學教育學制應改為大學系內理論組與實務組。
關於考試方面，法學教育受國家考試影響，對於非國家考試考科皆棄如敝屣，
國家考試科目應領域界定，並應開放考生可以參考法典。法官選任部分，應改由
資深且優秀律師轉任，以避免法官社會經驗不足而造成判案結果不符合民眾期
待。
關於任用方面，國家司法考試通過後應分成四階段，以增加錄取者更多元且
紮實的經驗。針對在職進修，台灣的專業職業，如教師、會計師等皆須進修、換
照，由於法律日新月異，法官無道理不須進修換照。
關鍵字：法學教育、國家考試改革、司法改革、司法人員任用、法律與其他專業
領域整合。;Abstract
To successfully trained an excellent legal professional depends on the quality of
legal education and long-term training and cultivation during professional career.
Taiwan is currently facing the problem of the disconnection between legal
professionals and society. How can teachers and students of law schools respond to
the society′s expectations of legal education, so that the legal system can effectively
solve social justice issues? At present, Taiwan society is dissatisfied with the lawyers
or judicial officers at large so people demand law education reform.
This study uses the perspectives of teachers and students of the law department
to examine the current situation of legal education in Taiwan regarding its legal
education system, textbook contents, national examinations, and the ability to relate
legal education with other professional fields. It also refers to the United States,
Germany, and Japan’s legal education system to propose reform methods for Taiwan’s
legal education.
This research uses the method of survey questionnaires distributed to the
teachers and students of the law departments to conduct quantitative analysis, and
provided suggestions on the reform of current legal education in Taiwan. In
conclusions, the findings of this study are in the following:
In terms of teaching, this study found that the proportion of case-based teaching
methods accounted for mostly 60% of the courses in law departments, and this type of
course facilitate the application of the knowledge of law to actual cases.
Regarding the teaching materials, this study found that most people agree the
professors in law school should further redesign the course materials or improve the
teaching methods. The reforms of legal education have already been carried out to
make up the gap between the theory and practice of legal education. However, schools
should offer ethics courses on lawyers or judges. In addition, with regard to the
program reform of the legal education system, this study found out that the legal
departments in Taiwan should be divided into two tracks: the theoretical-oriented
program and the practical-oriented program in the university.
Regarding examinations, legal education is affected by national judical
examinations, students tend to abandoned courses which are not included in national
judical examinations. The subjects of national legal examinations should be defined
by fields, and legal dictionary allowed be uesd during the exam. The selection of
judges should be replaced by senior and excellent lawyers to avoid judges’ lack of
social experience and the result of judgments that do not meet the expectations of the
public.
Regarding legal position appointments, the national judicial examination should
be divided into four stages after passing the written test, in order to increase diverse
and solid experiences of the candidates. Regarding on-the-job training, judges should
follow other professions, such as teachers and accountants, require further training
and renewal of licenses.
Keywords: Legal education, national examination reform, judicial reform, judicial
appointment, integration of law and other professional fields. |
