| 摘要: | 本計畫針對《文選》所錄三篇「設論」之作進行探討。首先，「設論」的題材主旨相當明確一致，均為「士不遇」。形式上也頗為雷同，皆一人分飾兩個身份，一者詰問質疑，一者回應辯駁，應辯時多採古今對照的模式；其次，考索作者所處之時代背景及其境遇，以見創作此類作品的緣由；其三，分析三篇內容上之異同，雖然都是表達「士不遇」，然其間猶有差異，不能概略而等同視之，否則將喪失確切、完整理解此類作品的契機；其四，六朝時期其他同類作品與《文選》所錄三篇之比較，以見蕭統選文之標準與考量。歸結出何以《文選》於「設論」一體，選錄的作品僅限於兩漢時期最早寫成的三篇，魏晉以降此類的作品全然割捨；其五，探討「設論」與「賦」、「對問」之間的關係，何以「設論」得以從「賦」此一文學大國中獨立出來，別子為宗。例如在作用上，「設論」透過 主、客兩個角色的安排，實際上是在進行自我心靈對話，是對現況不滿、誘惑與堅持初衷之間的角力，呈現的是自我內心的糾結與掙扎。這不論是與主流漢賦用以「抒下情而通諷諭」，或「宣上德」以「潤色鴻業」，關懷的是所處外在客觀環境，有所不同；或是「對問」用以辨析名理，亦不同轍。 ;This plan explores the three "SHE LUN" works selected from the "Wen Xuan". First, the subject matter of "set theory" is quite clear and unified, and it is all "Shih Bu Yu". The form is also very similar, all a person in two characters, one to ask questions, one is to answer, the answer is mostly using ancient, modern control model; Second, investigate author’s period and his experience. Third, compare with content of these three literary works, finding the same and their difference, although they want to present "Shih Bu Yu", but there are still differences, can not simply treat them as the same, otherwise, it will lose the opportunity to find out accurately these writings. Fourth, compare these three works of "Wen Xuan" with Six Dynasties writings, comprehend the standard of SIAO TONG.summarize why only these three writings are chosen from "SHE LUN” in "Wen Xuan". Fifth, discuss the relationship of "SHE LUN", "FU” and "DUEI WUN", then, why "SHE LUN” can be dished individually.For example, "SHE LUN” is through the master, guests of the two roles of the arrangement, in fact, is in the self-spiritual dialogue, is the status of dissatisfaction, temptation and adherence to the original intention between the struggle, showing the inner tangle and struggle of the self. Whether this is with the mainstream Han Fu used to "express and sarcasm", or "to "promote virtue" to "retouch Hongye", care scare situating the external objective environment, different, or "to ask" used to distinguish the reasons, is not the same. |
