過去警察人員於特別權力關係中，其權利受有許多限制，然隨著時代的演變以及許多相關的司法院憲法解釋出現，特別權力關係亦開始式微，對於過去於特別權力關係底下的相對人，其基本權有了更多的保障。基於警察與國家間包含了公權力之行使以及警察任務之執行等關係，對於警察人員相關之要求較為繁雜，其中包含了警察服裝以及儀容相關規定，然而這樣的規定是否限制了警察人員之基本權？有無符合法律保留原則以及比例原則？實有討論之必要。 本文以我國警察人員服裝儀容規定為主，並與香港之警察人員服裝儀容規定做比較，探討我國關於警察人員服裝儀容相關之規定是否違憲？相對我國，香港是否就對於服裝儀容之規定較為寬鬆或是嚴格？本文希望透過我國與香港制度間之分析，以及對於目前規範內容之合憲性探討，提供日後可能之修法方向。;In the past, police officers operated under a special power relationship that imposed various restrictions on their rights. However, with the passage of time and the emergence of relevant judicial interpretations, the influence of this special power relationship has diminished, leading to enhanced protection of the fundamental rights of individuals subjected to it. Due to the exercise of public authority and the execution of law enforcement duties, the demands placed on police officers, including regulations regarding their uniforms and appearance, have become more complex. However, do these regulations limit the basic rights of police officers? Do they adhere to the principles of legality and proportionality? These questions warrant further discussion. This article primarily focuses on the regulations pertaining to the dress and appearance of police officers and compares them to those in Hong Kong. It seeks to examine whether the regulations in our country regarding police officers′ dress and appearance are unconstitutional. Additionally, it aims to determine whether Hong Kong has more relaxed or stringent regulations concerning dress and appearance. Through an analysis of the systems in both countries and a discussion on the constitutionality of the current regulations, this article aims to provide potential directions for future legislative amendments.
