English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 70588/70588 (100%)
Visitors : 23054521      Online Users : 547
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/982

    Authors: 曾文麟;Wen-lin Tseng
    Contributors: 土木工程研究所
    Keywords: 契約;工程司;專業營建管理;公共工程;信任;trust;public works;contract;PCM
    Date: 2009-03-24
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 17:17:08 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 國內公共工程契約工程司的制度是引用自FIDIC契約範本,但從民國60-80年代僅部分工程專責機關採用,到民國九十年起由主管機關制訂契約範本提供各工程機關運用,工程司角色始終無法被清楚定位。本研究嘗試分析在國內「工程司」制度下,「工程司」與其他參與成員間的相互關係、權責區分、法律授權基礎及執行現況,並以工程司制度所衍生信任問題,建立適用施工專案的信任評估模式,以了解組織間各參與角色間的信任變化,並適時提出預警及改善管控。 本研究經由文獻蒐集分析、專家訪談、問卷調查等程序,並以法律角度分析參與者關係架構,以信任相關理論建立信任評估模式,最後得到之結論主要有:(1) 工程司角色若不具第三人地位時,應與承攬人立於公平地位,而不應以裁判者或準仲裁者自居;(2)工程司與專案管理廠商最大不同處,在於工程司可被授與公權力管轄事項決定之權限,專案管理廠商則不行;(3)本研究建立的「公共工程施工契約中各參與成員之工作項目與權責區分關係表」,可釐清參與成員間之權責關係; (4)本研究建立的「信任評估模式」雛形,經實際案例驗證,可快速、有效進行信任管理、改善。 One major difference between FIDIC conditions for construction contracts and conventional conditions in domestic construction contracts in Taiwan is that the Engineer is employed in FIDIC contracts. As the “Engineer” is not a contracting party, but is authorized to manage the contract, the structure of relationship between the “Engineer” and other participants in the contract is often difficult to distinguish. This study explores the structure of relationship among the participants and the “Engineer” from legal point of view and tries to make some clarification. In addition, in order to solve the Engineer role's trust problem derived, try to construct the trust model of the public project suitably and evaluate to each participates in the trust among the roles in public project. This study, through expert interview, comprehensive questionnaires, and collection of viewpoints of clients, contractors, and architects/engineers (A/Es), involved in public construction projects employing the Engineer role between 2003 and 2006. Some conclusions can be made as the followings: (1) The “Engineer”, substituting the client entity, carries out the task of managing construction contract will become a future trend. (2) The conflict of professional status between the “Engineer” and the full-time engineering staff of contractors could be resolved by improving the legal position of the “Engineer” and by implementing the principle of balanced power and responsibility of the “Engineer” through the contract terms. (3) A table maps out the responsibilities of each party in a public works contract is derived in this study and can be a reference if any public entity adopts the “Engineer” in it construction contract. (4)A trust model is proposed to conduct a trust evaluation for public entities to the engineer, the engineer to contractor, and contractor to the engineer. The trust model was verified to enhance the trust management.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程研究所] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明