我的迷你寵物：手持裝置上的動物同伴

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：3.143.204.252

姓名

廖長彥(Chang-Yen Liao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

我的迷你寵物：手持裝置上的動物同伴
(My-Mini-Pet: Animal Companion System for Hand-held Devices)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

動物同伴是一種針對兒童所設計的學習同伴，擁有寵物的形貌與特質，藉著與動物同伴互動和飼養，能夠引發兒童學習動機，並參與學習活動。藉由不同特色的行動裝置與無線運算能力，行動學習能為我們帶來許多不同的學習機會，近來，透過遊戲式學習也能為兒童的學習帶來益處。因此，如何設計一個遊戲式學習環境於手持裝置上變得相當具有意義。本研究參考遊戲設計、小螢幕設計與使用者中心設計等理論，開發了於行動裝置上，以寵物飼養環境的系統命名為My-Mini-Pet，並以一對一數位學習環境下的數學活動為實例，嘗試設計與運用動物同伴的學習引導機制、變裝機制與情感機制，來促進學習者的學習動機。
本研究讓學習者操作載具為主要活動，並利用問卷、實驗活動及訪談法作為資料收集的方式，透過在實驗過程所蒐集資料之結果，發現具引導機制的遊戲，能讓學習者願意多花時間，進行練習。My-Mini-Pet系統具學習動機上的引導，其變裝機制也能吸引受試者的注意力，並令受試者對於動物同伴產生情感依附的狀況，整體來看，My-Mini-Pet系統對學習的專注性和長期的使用動機確實具有幫助。

摘要(英)

Mobile learning brings us more learning opportunities due to the characteristics of learning devices and wireless computing. Recently, game-based learning also provides promising benefits in children’s leaning. Therefore, how to design a game-based learning environment in handheld devices by combining an existing game with different learning activities is a significant research issue. In this paper, a domain-independent approach is proposed to incorporating game activities with learning activities. We attempt to incorporate game elements with the learning environment design in the PDA for students. Three considerations for the learning environment design in the hand-held devices are discussed: game element design, small screen design, and learner-centered design. According to these three considerations, a pet-nurturing game environment in the PDA, My-Mini-Pet system, is developed, including three components: digital attachment mechanism, learning guidance mechanism, and costume show mechanism. The design rationale behind the My-Mini-Pet system is that taking good care of the Mini-My-Pet is actually improving the learner’s learning status.

關鍵字(中)

★ 動物同伴
★ 行動學習
★ 遊戲式學習
★ 行動裝置
★ My-Mini-Pet

關鍵字(英)

★ game-based learning
★ mobile learning
★ animal companion
★ hand-held device
★ My-Mini-Pet

論文目次

目錄 i
圖次 v
表次 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
一、研究背景 1
二、研究動機 1
第二節研究問題 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節學習同伴 5
一、近側發展區 6
二、學習同伴系統 7
第二節動物同伴 8
一、學習寵物 8
二、My-Pet-Our-Pet 9
第三節無線互動學習裝置 11
第三章系統設計 14
第一節設計理念 14
一、遊戲元素設計 14
二、小畫面設計 17
三、使用者中心設計 20
第二節 My-Mini-Pet之設計 22
一、引導機制 22
二、變裝機制 23
三、對於情感的設計 24
第四章系統實作 25
第一節系統開發 25
一、開發工具 25
二、系統環境 25
三、系統元件 26
第二節系統說明 28
一、遊戲主畫面 29
二、圖書館 31
三、寵物商店 32
四、寵物醫院 33
五、市區地圖 33
第三節學習情境 38
第五章研究方法與設計 42
第一節研究方法 42
一、問卷 42
二、實驗活動 42
三、事後訪談 43
第二節研究對象與場域 44
第三節研究工具 45
一、動機量表 45
二、系統評估問卷 45
三、學習成就測驗 45
四、教材 45
第四節研究設計與流程 46
一、預試的進行 47
二、團體施測 47
三、個別施測 48
第五節資料分析 48
一、資料分析方式 48
二、資料分析內容 49
第六章實驗結果 52
第一節成就試卷分析 52
一、描述性統計 52
二、推論統計 53
三、結果歸納 54
第二節系統紀錄分析 55
一、答題正確量 55
二、作答時間 56
三、試誤數 59
四、答題正確率 60
五、結果歸納 62
第三節系統評估問卷分析 62
一、介面評估 63
二、數學教材 64
三、金幣、變裝機制 65
四、情感附著 67
五、新增功能 70
六、結果歸納 71
第四節動機量表分析 71
一、逐題比較 72
二、整體比較 77
三、結果歸納 80
第五節訪談資料分析 81
一、學習引導機制 81
二、變裝機制 83
三、情感機制 84
四、促進討論 85
第七章結論與未來工作 87
第一節結論 87
一、學習引導機制 87
二、變裝機制 88
三、情感附著 88
第二節未來工作 89
一、邊際效應遊戲模式設計 89
二、強化學習內容與長期學習動機 90
三、變裝機制的調整 90
四、開放式學生模型設計 90
五、增強與學習者的互動 90
參考書目 91

參考文獻

Barron, B., & Kantor, R. (1993). Tools to enhance math education: The Jasper Series. CACM, 36 (5), 52-53.
Katja, B. & Säde, S. (2002). Emotional responses to virtual prototypes in the design evaluation of a product concept. In: Green & Jordan(Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. Taylor&Francis, pp. 247-256.
Beck, A., & Katcher, A. (1996). Between pets and people. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 4-16.
Botterill, C. (1977). Goal-setting and performance on an endurance task. Paper presented at the conference of the Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Bull, S. (2004). Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models, Proceedings of 4th Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, Greece. Keynote.
Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2005). A Framework for Designing and Analysing Open Learner Modelling, Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, 81-90.
Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). 'Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?': Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model, In: Green & Jordan(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education(AACE), Charlottesville, VA, 1995, 501-508.
Bull, S., Mangat, M., Mabbott, A., Abu Issa, A. S., & Marsh, J. (2005). Reactions to Inspectable Learner Models: Seven Year Olds to University Students, Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, 1-10.
Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1976). A tutoring and student modeling paradigm for gaming environment. In Colman, R., & Lorton, P. Jr. (Eds). Computer Science and Education, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 8(1), 236-246.
Chan, T. W. (1995). Global social learning club, unpublished manuscript.National Central University, Taiwan.
Chan, T. W. (1996). Learning Companion Systems, Social Learning systems, and the Global Social Learning Club. Journal of Artificial intelligence in Education, 7 (2), 125-159.
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1995). Simulating a Learning Companion in Reciprocal Tutoring System. The Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 49–56.
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the Design of Computer Supports for Reciprocal Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 1-29.
Chan, T.W. (1991). Itegration-Kid: A Learning Companion System. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Australia, 2, 1094-1099.
Chan, T.W., & Baskin, A. B. (1988). "Studying With the Prince" the Computer as A Learning Companion. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring, ITS88, Montreal, Canada, 194-200.
Chan, T. W., & Baskin, A. B. (1990). Learning Companion Systems. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier(Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems(pp.6-33). New Jersey:Ablex.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chang, L. J., & Chan, T. W. (2001). An motivating learning platform for children through the pet-raising mechanism. National Computer Symposium, Taipei, 203-210.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chang, L. J., & Chan, T. W. (2002). An approach to cultivating reading habits for children with pet-raising games. The 6th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Beijing, 213-216.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2005a). Motivating Learners by Nurturing Animal Companions: My-Pet and Our-Pet, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 136-143.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2005b). Animal companions as motivators for teammates helping each other learn, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan, 43-47.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2007). Active open learner models as animal companions: motivating children to learn through interaction with My-Pet and Our-Pet. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 17, 145-167.
Chen, Z. H., Yang, J. C., Deng, Y. C., & Chan, T. W. (2003). Environment design through coupling pet-raising games with domain-independent learning activities. The 7th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Nanjing, 755-759.
Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W., & Lin, C. J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, 255–269.
Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624-627.
Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., & Thomas, S. A. (1983). Social interaction and blood pressure: Influence of animal companions. Journal Nerv Ment Dis, 171(8), 461-465.
Fujita, M. (2001), AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures, International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(10), 781.
Goldman, S., Pea, R., & Maldonado, H. (2004). Emerging social engineering in the wireless classroom. In Y. Kafai, W. Saldoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera(Eds.), Proceedings of Sixth ICLS 2004(pp.222-230).Mahwah, NJ: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodlad, S., & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. London: Kogan Page.
Gyanani, T. C., & Pahuja, P. (1995). Brief research report: Effects of peer tutoring on abilities and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 469-475.
Hayden, T., & Pan, E. (1998, October 19), Fun! Fearless! Furby!, Newsweek, 132(16), 66.
House, W. C. (1973). Performance expectancies and affect associated with outcomes as a function of time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 277-288.
Hue, C. W., Chung I. L., & Chan, T. W. (1994). Computer game and intrinsic motivation: a re-implementation of WEST. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 137-147
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN：Interaction Book Company.
Jones, M., Marsden, G., Mohd-Nasir, N., Boone, K., Buchanan, G. (2002). Improving Web interaction on small displays. Proceedings WWW8, Toronto, 1999. Retrieved October, 12, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www8.org/w8-papers/1bmultimedia/improving/improving.html.
Kamba, T., Elson, S., Harpold, T., Stamper, T., ＆ Piyawadee, N. (1996). Using Small Screen Space More Efficiently. In CHI'96, Vancouver, Canada.
Kärkkäinen, L., & Laarni, J. (2002, October). Design for Small Screens. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Aarhus, Denmark.
Katcher, A. H. (2000). The future of educational research on the animal-human bond and animal assisted therapy, Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy, NY: Academic Press, 486-469.
Kay, J. (1997). Invited keynote address, Learner know thyself: student models to give learner control and responsibility. Halim, Z, T Ottomann, Z Razak, (eds). ICCE'97 International Conference on Computers in Education, 17-24.
Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1987). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D. H. Jonassen(Eds.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Lawrence Erlbaum Publisher.
Laarni, J. (2002, October). Design for Small Screens. Searching for optimal methods of presenting dynamic text on different types of screens. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laarni, J., & Kojo, I. (2001). Reading financial news from PDA and laptop displays. In M. J. Smith, & G. Salvendy(Eds.), Systems, Social and Internationalization Design Aspects of Human- Computer Interaction. NJ: Mahwah..
Levinson, B. M. (1969). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
Lindholm, C., Keinonen, T., & Kiljander, H. (2003). How Nokia changed the face of the mobile phone. McGraw-Hill.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Luchini, K., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Design guidelines for learner-centered hand-held tools. In Proceedings of CHI2004(pp.135-142). New York: ACM Press.
Maheady, L. (1998). Advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted learning strategies.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-369.
Melson, G. F. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
MSDN. (2002). Designing a User Interface for Windows CE [Mobile and Embedded Development]. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wcedesgn/htm/_wcesdk_designing_a_user_interface_for_windows_ce.asp.
Myers, b. A., Nichols, J., Eobbrock, J. O., & Miller, R. C. (2004). Taking hand-held devices to the next level. IEEE Computer, 36(12), 36-43.
Myers, O. E. (1998). Children and animals. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
NetDay. (2005). NetDay’s 2004 survey results. Available at: http://www.netday.org/news_2004_survey_results.htm.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Francisco: Academic.
Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
NOP World. (2005). mKids Study. United Business Media. Available from: http://www.nopworld.com/news.asp?go=news_item&key=151.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. NY: Currency.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. NY: Basic Books.
Pesce, M. (2000). The playful world: How technology is transforming our imagination. New York: Random House.
Pownell, D., & Bailey, G. (2001). Getting a handle on hand-helds. American School Board Journal, 188(6), 18-21.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rahman, T., & Muter, P. (1999). Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows. Human Factors, 41, 106-117.
Rasmusson, J., Dahlgren, F., Gustafsson, H., & Nilsson, T. (2004). Multimedia in mobile phones – The ongoing Revolution. Ericsson Review, 2, 98-107.
Roberts, D., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005, March). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll , J. M. (2002). Usability Engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Sawyer, K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Self, J. (1988). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modeling. International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada, 18-24.
Shneiderman, B. (1988). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston :Addison-Wesley.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperatve Learning: Theory, Research and Practice 2rd ed.
Thornaton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phones in education. In J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, Kinshuk, & S. Yang(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE WMTE2004(pp.3-10). NY: IEEE Press.
Tinker, R. F., & Krajcik, J. S. (Eds.). (2001). Portable technologies: science learning in context. NY: Kluwer Academic.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning (pp. 45-65). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Eds.).
Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Vredenburg. K., Isensee. S., & Righi. C. (2002). User-centered design: an integrated approach. NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridg, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webster, N. C. (1998, June 26). Tamagotchi, Advertising Age, 69(26), 43.
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American(September): 66-75.
Wilson, T., & Whitelock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-medicated communication environment for distance learning computer science students Computer Education, 30(3/4), 259-269.

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2007-7-17

推文