參考文獻 |
Barron, B., & Kantor, R. (1993). Tools to enhance math education: The Jasper Series. CACM, 36 (5), 52-53.
Katja, B. & Säde, S. (2002). Emotional responses to virtual prototypes in the design evaluation of a product concept. In: Green & Jordan(Eds.), Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. Taylor&Francis, pp. 247-256.
Beck, A., & Katcher, A. (1996). Between pets and people. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 4-16.
Botterill, C. (1977). Goal-setting and performance on an endurance task. Paper presented at the conference of the Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Bull, S. (2004). Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models, Proceedings of 4th Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, Greece. Keynote.
Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2005). A Framework for Designing and Analysing Open Learner Modelling, Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, 81-90.
Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). 'Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?': Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model, In: Green & Jordan(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education(AACE), Charlottesville, VA, 1995, 501-508.
Bull, S., Mangat, M., Mabbott, A., Abu Issa, A. S., & Marsh, J. (2005). Reactions to Inspectable Learner Models: Seven Year Olds to University Students, Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, 1-10.
Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1976). A tutoring and student modeling paradigm for gaming environment. In Colman, R., & Lorton, P. Jr. (Eds). Computer Science and Education, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 8(1), 236-246.
Chan, T. W. (1995). Global social learning club, unpublished manuscript.National Central University, Taiwan.
Chan, T. W. (1996). Learning Companion Systems, Social Learning systems, and the Global Social Learning Club. Journal of Artificial intelligence in Education, 7 (2), 125-159.
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1995). Simulating a Learning Companion in Reciprocal Tutoring System. The Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 49–56.
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the Design of Computer Supports for Reciprocal Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 1-29.
Chan, T.W. (1991). Itegration-Kid: A Learning Companion System. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Australia, 2, 1094-1099.
Chan, T.W., & Baskin, A. B. (1988). "Studying With the Prince" the Computer as A Learning Companion. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring, ITS88, Montreal, Canada, 194-200.
Chan, T. W., & Baskin, A. B. (1990). Learning Companion Systems. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier(Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems(pp.6-33). New Jersey:Ablex.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chang, L. J., & Chan, T. W. (2001). An motivating learning platform for children through the pet-raising mechanism. National Computer Symposium, Taipei, 203-210.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chang, L. J., & Chan, T. W. (2002). An approach to cultivating reading habits for children with pet-raising games. The 6th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Beijing, 213-216.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2005a). Motivating Learners by Nurturing Animal Companions: My-Pet and Our-Pet, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 136-143.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2005b). Animal companions as motivators for teammates helping each other learn, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan, 43-47.
Chen, Z. H., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2007). Active open learner models as animal companions: motivating children to learn through interaction with My-Pet and Our-Pet. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 17, 145-167.
Chen, Z. H., Yang, J. C., Deng, Y. C., & Chan, T. W. (2003). Environment design through coupling pet-raising games with domain-independent learning activities. The 7th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, Nanjing, 755-759.
Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W., & Lin, C. J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, 255–269.
Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624-627.
Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., & Thomas, S. A. (1983). Social interaction and blood pressure: Influence of animal companions. Journal Nerv Ment Dis, 171(8), 461-465.
Fujita, M. (2001), AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures, International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(10), 781.
Goldman, S., Pea, R., & Maldonado, H. (2004). Emerging social engineering in the wireless classroom. In Y. Kafai, W. Saldoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera(Eds.), Proceedings of Sixth ICLS 2004(pp.222-230).Mahwah, NJ: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodlad, S., & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. London: Kogan Page.
Gyanani, T. C., & Pahuja, P. (1995). Brief research report: Effects of peer tutoring on abilities and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 469-475.
Hayden, T., & Pan, E. (1998, October 19), Fun! Fearless! Furby!, Newsweek, 132(16), 66.
House, W. C. (1973). Performance expectancies and affect associated with outcomes as a function of time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 277-288.
Hue, C. W., Chung I. L., & Chan, T. W. (1994). Computer game and intrinsic motivation: a re-implementation of WEST. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 137-147
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN:Interaction Book Company.
Jones, M., Marsden, G., Mohd-Nasir, N., Boone, K., Buchanan, G. (2002). Improving Web interaction on small displays. Proceedings WWW8, Toronto, 1999. Retrieved October, 12, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www8.org/w8-papers/1bmultimedia/improving/improving.html.
Kamba, T., Elson, S., Harpold, T., Stamper, T., & Piyawadee, N. (1996). Using Small Screen Space More Efficiently. In CHI'96, Vancouver, Canada.
Kärkkäinen, L., & Laarni, J. (2002, October). Design for Small Screens. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Aarhus, Denmark.
Katcher, A. H. (2000). The future of educational research on the animal-human bond and animal assisted therapy, Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy, NY: Academic Press, 486-469.
Kay, J. (1997). Invited keynote address, Learner know thyself: student models to give learner control and responsibility. Halim, Z, T Ottomann, Z Razak, (eds). ICCE'97 International Conference on Computers in Education, 17-24.
Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1987). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D. H. Jonassen(Eds.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Lawrence Erlbaum Publisher.
Laarni, J. (2002, October). Design for Small Screens. Searching for optimal methods of presenting dynamic text on different types of screens. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laarni, J., & Kojo, I. (2001). Reading financial news from PDA and laptop displays. In M. J. Smith, & G. Salvendy(Eds.), Systems, Social and Internationalization Design Aspects of Human- Computer Interaction. NJ: Mahwah..
Levinson, B. M. (1969). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
Lindholm, C., Keinonen, T., & Kiljander, H. (2003). How Nokia changed the face of the mobile phone. McGraw-Hill.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Luchini, K., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Design guidelines for learner-centered hand-held tools. In Proceedings of CHI2004(pp.135-142). New York: ACM Press.
Maheady, L. (1998). Advantages and disadvantages of peer-assisted learning strategies.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-369.
Melson, G. F. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
MSDN. (2002). Designing a User Interface for Windows CE [Mobile and Embedded Development]. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wcedesgn/htm/_wcesdk_designing_a_user_interface_for_windows_ce.asp.
Myers, b. A., Nichols, J., Eobbrock, J. O., & Miller, R. C. (2004). Taking hand-held devices to the next level. IEEE Computer, 36(12), 36-43.
Myers, O. E. (1998). Children and animals. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
NetDay. (2005). NetDay’s 2004 survey results. Available at: http://www.netday.org/news_2004_survey_results.htm.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Francisco: Academic.
Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
NOP World. (2005). mKids Study. United Business Media. Available from: http://www.nopworld.com/news.asp?go=news_item&key=151.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. NY: Currency.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. NY: Basic Books.
Pesce, M. (2000). The playful world: How technology is transforming our imagination. New York: Random House.
Pownell, D., & Bailey, G. (2001). Getting a handle on hand-helds. American School Board Journal, 188(6), 18-21.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rahman, T., & Muter, P. (1999). Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows. Human Factors, 41, 106-117.
Rasmusson, J., Dahlgren, F., Gustafsson, H., & Nilsson, T. (2004). Multimedia in mobile phones – The ongoing Revolution. Ericsson Review, 2, 98-107.
Roberts, D., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005, March). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Rosson, M. B., & Carroll , J. M. (2002). Usability Engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Sawyer, K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Self, J. (1988). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modeling. International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada, 18-24.
Shneiderman, B. (1988). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston :Addison-Wesley.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperatve Learning: Theory, Research and Practice 2rd ed.
Thornaton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phones in education. In J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, Kinshuk, & S. Yang(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE WMTE2004(pp.3-10). NY: IEEE Press.
Tinker, R. F., & Krajcik, J. S. (Eds.). (2001). Portable technologies: science learning in context. NY: Kluwer Academic.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning (pp. 45-65). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Eds.).
Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Vredenburg. K., Isensee. S., & Righi. C. (2002). User-centered design: an integrated approach. NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridg, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webster, N. C. (1998, June 26). Tamagotchi, Advertising Age, 69(26), 43.
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American(September): 66-75.
Wilson, T., & Whitelock, D. (1998). What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-medicated communication environment for distance learning computer science students Computer Education, 30(3/4), 259-269. |