博碩士論文 945204018 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:42 、訪客IP:3.142.241.3
姓名 林治毅(Chih-I Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 電腦輔助同儕互評於英文音素學習之初探
(A Pilot Study on English Phonemes with Computer Supported Peer Assessment)
相關論文
★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學:透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島:興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園:學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣★ TTPR:設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 英文已成為現今每一個學生必學的一門語言科目,可是在絕大部分的學生對於學習英文覺得很困難,更把最重要的發音基礎給忽略掉,導致其成為學習英語上的失敗原因之一。也礙於在非英文母語國家的環境下,無法使在學習上達到較正確的發音。所以本研究提出一個英文音素(English phoneme,EP) 的學習活動並運用電腦同儕互評 (Computer Supported Peer Assessment)來輔助對於音素認知 (Phonemic awareness) 之數位學習環境來幫助小朋友學習發音的初探研究,且運用賓果(Bingo) 讓學生在無考試的壓力之下來作學習測驗。
EP的學習流程包括五個階段:一、自我學習發音的教材,二、自我練習以及錄音,三、自我評量上傳的最佳錄音,四、匿名評量同儕的最佳錄音,五、和同儕一起討論互評的結果。最後再進行賓果(Bingo)遊戲測驗。
為了瞭解對於EP系統如何輔助學生對於音素上的有所認知、在混合了中高低學習成就表現的同儕中,進行小組內的同儕互評及同儕討論的互動及評估活動流程上的合理性,本研究共進行了八個單元的學習及評估活動。本論文將說明研究背景、動機、目的、各學習階段的設計邏輯,描述電腦輔助系統的設計與介面以及探討在評估活動中的發現,並提出一些對未來該研究工作的建議。
摘要(英) English has already become the required language course which every student is going to take, but most of them have difficulties when facing learning English pronunciation. Moreover, one of the failure reasons for English pronunciation – the articulation – which students usually forget is the important foundation. Yet, in the non-English speaking environments country is difficult to pronounce the English sound correctly. Therefore, this research has proposed the digital learning environment of English phoneme with Computer Supported Peer Assessment to help children to learn how to articulate correctly. Also, applying the Bingo game in testing could let pupils evaluate themselves without feeling any pressure of doing the exam.
The English Phoneme (EP) system learning flow includes five stages: (1) self-paced learning about the articulation material, (2) self-practicing and self-recording, (3) uploading the best self-recording and giving self-assessment, (4) peer-assessing the peers’ best recording, anonymously, and (5) discussing the results with peers.
Only the last stage is required to work with peers, and the previous stages (stage one to stage four) are working individually. At last, a bingo game will be used after the fifth stage in order to complete the whole EP learning activity.
Eight experimental unit activities were conducted to investigate how EP learning can assist pupils in the phonemic awareness, the effect of EP learning on student performance during peer-assessment and peer-discussion experimental unit trials, and the suitability of the experimental learning activity design to EP learning.
This thesis gives accounts for the research background, motivation, purposes and the rationales of each stage, describes the system design and interfaces, and reports and discuss the results of the eight experimental unit activities described above. Recommendations for further study are addressed in the final section of this thesis.
關鍵字(中) ★ 同儕討論
★ 音素認知
★ 電腦同儕互評
關鍵字(英) ★ Computer Supported Peer Assessment
★ Peer Discussion
★ Phonemic Awareness
論文目次 Table of Content
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
Acknowledgements IV
Table of Content VI
Figures VIII
Tables X
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background 1
1.2. Motivation 4
1.3. Research objectives 5
2. Literature Review 6
2.1. Phonemic awareness 6
2.2. Peer assessment 7
2.3. Computer Supported Peer Assessment 8
2.3.1. The theoretical foundation of Networked peer assessment 10
3. Methodology 16
3.1. Participants 16
3.2. Data collection and analysis 18
3.3. Devices 19
3.4. Activity design 20
3.5. Class activities flow 21
3.5.1. Individual learning 23
3.5.2. Assessments 24
3.5.3. Peer discussion 25
3.5.4. Bingo 25
4. System design and implementation 26
4.1. System environment 26
4.2. System module 27
4.2.1. Research context 28
4.3. System interfaces 29
5. Results of study and discussion 35
5.1. Self-confidence 35
5.2. Phonemic awareness assisted 39
5.3. Learning environment 46
6. Conclusions and Future Works 50
7. References 52
Appendix 1: Experiment schedule in detail 57
Appendix 2: Questionnaire 58
Appendix 3: Letter for parents or guardian 60
Appendix 4: Lateral mouth position diagram 61
Appendix 5: English Phoneme Index 64
Appendix 6: Paper-based Bingo (Unit1) 65
Appendix 7: Paper-based Bingo (Unit2) 66
Appendix 8: Paper-based Bingo (Unit3) 67
Appendix 9: Paper-based Bingo (Unit4) 68
Appendix 10: Paper-based Bingo (Unit5) 69
Appendix 11: Paper-based Bingo (Unit6) 70
Appendix 12: Paper-based Bingo (Unit7) 71
Appendix 13: Paper-based Bingo (Unit8) 72
參考文獻 Adams, Marilyn Jager (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc. [ED 317 950]
Allington, R. L., & Cunningham, P. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children can read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
Allington, R. L., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999). The politics of literacy teaching: How “research” shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher, 28(8), 4–23.
Au, K. (1998). Constructivist approaches, phonics, and the literacy learning of pupils of diverse backgrounds. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodríguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1–21). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
Ayres, L. (1998). Phonological awareness training of kindergarten children: Three treatments and their effects. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading (pp. 209–258). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bingo History. Retrieved on 16th April, 2007. http://www.bingobuddies.com/facts.html
Boud, D., & Lublin, J. (1983). Student self-assessment: Educational benefits within existing resources. In G. Squires (Ed.), Innovation through recession (Vol. 1, pp. 93-99). Guildford, Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Boves, L ., Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A., & Strik, H. (2002). The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441-467.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read – A casual connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
Calado, S. M. R. (1994). The impact of system design factors on users' reaction to peer
feedback. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 1428.
Chiu, Chi-Huang, Wei-Ren & Yuan, Shyuan-Ming. (1998) We-based Collaborative Homework Review System. Proceedings of ICCE ’98, vol.2. 474-477.
Rafiq. Y., & Fullerton, H. (1996). Peer assessment of group projects in civil engineering. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 69-8 1.
Falchikov, N. (1989) Student self assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430
Falchikov, N. (1994). Learning from peer feedback marking: Student and teacher perspectives. In H. C. Foot, C. J. Howe, A. Anderson, A. K. Tolmie, & D. Warden (Eds.), Group and interactive learning(Vol.1, pp. 41 1416). Southampton, England: Computational Mechanics.
Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking - developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-87.
Franklin, C. A. (1981). Instructor versus peer feedback in microteaching on the acquisition of confrontation; illustrating, analogies, and use of examples; and question-asking teaching skills for pre-service science teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 3565.
Gaskins, I. W., Gaskins, J. C., & Gaskins, R.W. (1991). A Decoding Program for Poor Readers--And the Rest of the Class, Too! Language Arts, 68, 3, 213-225.
Gaskins, I.W., Gaskins, J.C., Gaskins, I.W. (1992). A decoding program for poor readers-and the rest of the class, too! Language Arts, 68, 213-225.
Harris, Theodore L., and Richard E. Hodges (1995). The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [ED 385 820]
Jacobs, G. (1989). Miscorrection in peer feedback in writing class. Journal of language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia, 20, 68.
Kelly, G. (2000). How to Teach Pronunciation. Charlbury, Oxfordshire, UK: Bluestone Press.
Learning First Alliance (2000). U. S. Department of Education, Teaching the Alphabetic Code: Phonics and Decoding Retrieved November 17, 2006, from http://www.readingrockets.org/articles/275
Lin, S. S. -J., & Liu, E. Z.–F. (2000). Learning effects of Web-based peer assessment for students with various thinking styles. Paper presented at the 2000 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.
Lin, S. S. –J., Liu, E. Z. –F., & Yuan, S. –M. (2000). Web-Based Peer Assessment: Does Attitude Influence Achievement? Paper presented at the 2000 annual meeting of Frontiers in Education held by IEEE, USA.
Liu, E. Z. –F., Lin, S. S. –J., & Yuan, S. –M. (2002). To propose a reviewer dispatching algorithm for networked peer assessment system. Paper presented at the ICCE 2002 conference, Auckland, New Zealand. (Published by IEEE Computer Society Press)
Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer-review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
Ministry of Education, ROC (2006). Guidelines of the Grade 1-9 Curriculum - the English learning curriculum. Retrieved on 4th December, 2006. http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU5147002/9CC/9CC.html?UNITID=271&CATEGORYID=845&FILEID=147654&open
Moats, L.C. (1998). Teaching decoding. American Educator, Spring/Summer, 42-49, 95.
Moats, L.C. (2001, October 27). A blueprint for professional development for teachers of reading and writing: knowledge, skills, and learning activities. Presentation at A Symposium on the National Reading Panel Report and Teacher Presentation. Los Angeles, CA.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: NICHD.
Obah, T. Y. (1993). Learning from others in the ESL writing class. English Quarterly, 25, 8.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Review of the books "Piaget and Knowing. Studies in Genetic Psychology" by Beryl A. Geber, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1979 & "Education et développement social de l'enfant" by Christiane Vandenplas-Holper, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1979. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 433-438.
Phonetics: The Sounds of English and Spanish. Retrieved on 14th October, 2006. http://www.uiowa.edu/~acadtech/phonetics/english/frameset.html
Pierce, Michelle (1997). Improving elementary pupils’ motivation. (Eric Document Reproduction Service. No. ED 412002)
Ramsey, P. G., Wenrich, M. D., Carline, J. D., Inui, T. S., Larson, E. B., & Logerfo. J. P. (1996). Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Academic Medicine, 71, 364-370.
Rosner, J. (1974). Auditory analysis training with prereaders. The Reading Teacher, 27, 379-384.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309-1324.
Shawn M. Glynn, Russell H. Yeany, & Bruce K. Britton.A Constructive View of learning Science. The Psychology of learning science. LEA Publishers, 1991
Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and coassessment. Learning Environment Research, 1, 293–319.
Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443–454.
Smit, U., & Dalton, C (2000). Motivational patterns in advanced EFL pronunciation learners. IRAL, 38 (3/4): 229-246.
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: a case study from psychology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71–81.
Stahl, S. (1997). Instructional models in reading: An introduction. In S. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 1–29). Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, Keith E. (1993-94). Romance and Reality (Distinguished Educator Series). The Reading Teacher, 47(4), 280-91. [EJ 477 302]
Taipei City Government Educational Department (2002), Taipei City Elementary English Teaching Curriculum Guidelines. Taipei City: Ministry of Education
http://www.tp.edu.tw/law/law_03.jsp
Topping, K. (1998) Peer Assessment Between Pupils in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276
Weaver, C. (1998c). Toward a balanced approach to reading. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading (pp. 11–74). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Whalen, S. & Csikszentntmihalyi, M. (1991). Putting flow theory into educational practice: The Key School’s flow activities Room. (ED338381)
Wibel, H.W. (1991). Reflection through writing. educational leadership, 48(6), 45-46.
Witbeck, M. C. (1976). Peer correction procedures for intermediate and advanced ESL composition lessons. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 321-326.
Yopp, Hallie Kay (1992). Developing Phonemic Awareness in Young Children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-703. [EJ 442 772]
Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 311-345.
指導教授 陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan) 審核日期 2007-7-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明