摘要(英) |
Collaborative storytelling facilitates children to foster social skills and creativity. However, creating stories is not easy. Children require abundant creative ideas to compile a story. Web 2.0 platform, known for collective intelligence, seems to fulfill the requirement of creative ideas. However, the copy rights may inhabit idea sharing. Creative commons, known for some rights reserved, enable idea sharing and multiple derivation and remix behavior, which is crucial to compile a story. The spirit of creative commons affects not only the derivation and remix mechanism, but also the children behavior in the process of storytelling。
The influential Wiki has different derivation and remix mechanism. Two mechanisms of Web2.0 are designed for the study: HyperCard with creative commons concept and Sequence with Wiki style. An empirical study was implemented to investigate participants’ perceptions for derivation, remix, mutual support, ownership and satisfaction.
Fifty seven participants, third grade of two classes were involved in this study four weeks. Instruments include questionnaire、log、video tapes. Results show children in HyperCard group performed superior to those of Sequence group in all five factors. In the end, Key concepts for system design, personal use and collaboration were provided。
|
參考文獻 |
中文部分
Wiki (2009),Wiki。2009年6月30日,取自:http://zh.Wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&variant=zh-tw#.E8.A9.9E.E6.BA.90,2009/6/30。
李治安(2007),「資訊內容的社會生產與公眾授權」,開放與自由:公眾創用國際研討會。台北:中央研究院資訊科學研究所
創用CC (2009),教育部創用手冊。2009年6月30日,取自: http://creativecommons.org.tw/gallery/Material/cchandbook_edu_2008.pdf。
楊佳蓉(2007),「創意共享授權機制應用於商業行為之初探」,貝立德─廣告與新媒體時代學術研討會,台北,中國文化大學,頁10。
盧文祥(2007),「從著作財產權授權利用之困境探討創作共享機制之推展」,東吳法律學報,17(2),頁249-296。
英文部分
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 41(2), 32.
Alexander, B., & Levine, A. (2008). Web 2.0 storytelling: Emergence of a new genre. Educause Review, 11.
Antle, A. (2003). Case study: The design of CBC4Kids’ StoryBuilder. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 59-68.
Atkinson, W. (1987). HyperCard, Software for Macintosh Computers, Cupertino, Apple Computer Co.
Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2009). What Type of Collaboration Helps?Psychological Ownership, Perceived Learning andOutcome Quality of Collaboration Using Google Docs, 48-55.
Denning, S. (2001). The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
Désilets, A., & Paquet, S. (2005). Wiki as a tool for web-based collaborative story telling in primary school: A case study. Proceedings of Ed-Media.
Druin, A., & Fast, C. (2002). The Child as Learner, Critic, Inventor, and Technology Design Partner: An Analysis of Three Years of Swedish Student Journals, International Journal of Technology and Design Education (12), 189–213.
Fukuhara, T., Nishida, T., & Uemura, S. (2002). POC communicator: A system for collaborative story building. Proc.Knowledge-Based Intelligence Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies (KES2002), 1336-1340.
Gerdt, P., Kommers, P., Looi, C.K., & Sutinen, E. (2001). Woven Stories as a Cognitive Tool. In Cognitive Technology, 233–247.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 435-449.
Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki way Addison-Wesley.
Nunnally, J. C. (1979). Psychometric theory: Secon d edition. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(2), 279-280.
O’Reilly, Network(2005),What Is Web 2.0。Retrieved on June, 25, 2009. From http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
Tompkins, G. E. (2002). Language arts: Content and teaching strategies. Upper Saddler River: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Wood, D., & O’Malley, C. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(4), 4-9.
|