三層式學習檔案利用機制之設計:輔助教師於數位教室環境中瞭解學生學習狀況

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：3.142.210.157

姓名

陳泊澍(Po-shu Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

三層式學習檔案利用機制之設計:輔助教師於數位教室環境中瞭解學生學習狀況
(A Three-level Mechanism for Profile Utilization: Helping Teachers Understand Students’ Learning Status duringin Mathematics Practice Gaming in Digital Classroom Environment)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來，研究者們紛紛將資訊科技導入教學中以促進學生學習成效，然而也帶來其他方面挑戰，例如教師設備管理負擔、相關系統的支援等。DCE(Digital Classroom Environment)的研究即於此背景下，利用一對一學習運算環境，嘗試解決這些問題與挑戰，特別是當教室情境從教師主導的授課模式，逐漸轉為以學生為中心的個人學習模式時，更該重新思考教師在課堂中的定位，系統又該如何輔助教師扮演好相對的角色。
因此，本研究延續先前DCE研究，進一步提出三層式學習檔案利用機制。三層式學習檔案利用意指三個不同利用層次的系統設計，包含：利用學習檔案紀錄驅動訊息通知、提供學生觀看學習檔案與尋求教師協助、針對學科提供基礎錯誤模式分析等。透過三層式學習檔案利用機制更準確的輔助教師真正掌握學生的學習狀況，達成到以學生本位的教學，老師的定位也可以從監控者（Monitor）轉換為指導者（Mentor）。換言之，透過三層式學習檔案利用機制，DCE可以從原先之監控系統(Monitoring System)轉換為指導系統(Mentoring System)。
本研究於桃園縣某國小三年級兩個班級進行實測，用以調整系統之穩定與完整性，並透過與教師的互動、觀察與記錄，了解教師在實際操作系統時可能衍生的問題。在實測流程中，老師均給予正面回饋，認為第一層的主動訊息通知可以鼓勵學生持續朝目標前進，而對第三層機制之錯誤模式分析功能，更給予高度評價，因為可以具體指出學生進一步改善之處。雖然第二層的學生求援功能在實測中效果無法張顯彰顯，老師則認為此結果應該與學科類型有極大相關性。

摘要(英)

Over these recent years, more and more researchers have been introducing informational technologies into education to enhance learners’ learning performance. However, this also brought in some challenges. For instance, hardware support for related systems, pressures from managing classroom facilities and etc. DCE (Digital Classroom Environment) was found under these circumstances, using one on one educational computing to solve these problems out and overcome the challenges. Especially when nowadays the context of teaching has turned from teacher-led into student-centered, we might have to rethink the role teachers play in the classroom, and brainstorm how we could effectively aid them in teaching.
Therefore, continuing from previous DCE research, we further introduced the three-leveled profile-utilization mechanism, the three-leveled profile-utilization mechanism is a program design that penetrates through three different areas, which includes: an auto notifier function that triggers message as profile being updated, a mechanism that allows students to view profiles/seek help from teacher and last a basis error-analysis provide to the course. Though this three-leveled profile-utilization mechanism, we let teachers know how each student is doing on their work to achieve a student-centered learning environment; a teacher same could use this system to turn him/her from a monitor into a real mentor. In other words, through this three-leveled profile utilization mechanism, DCE is transformed from previous Monitoring System into a new Mentoring System.
The research was taken place in one specific elementary school in Taoyuan, featuring two third grade classes in the experiment for adjustments of the system’s stability and integrity. Through the interactions between researchers and teachers, observations and opinions written down helped us understand the problems that might occur while teachers using this system. Teachers gave positive feedbacks to the system; they think that the first level of the mechanism, the auto notifier function constantly encourages students to work towards their target goals. They also highly valued the third level, the basis error-analysis mechanism because it successfully point out areas that need further improvements or taken care of. Although the second-level student-recourse mechanism didn’t pull out a strong manifestation during research, this is due to the type of the subjects chosen, therefore teachers still gave it good feedbacks and anticipate its results on other more suitable subjects.

關鍵字(中)

★ 數位教室
★ 良師指導系統
★ 學習檔案
★ 監控系統

關鍵字(英)

★ mentoring system
★ monitoring system
★ portfolio
★ digital classroom environment
★ DCE

論文目次

第一章、緒論................................................................................................................ 1
第一節研究背景...................................................................................................... 1
第二節研究動機與目的.......................................................................................... 2
第三節論文架構...................................................................................................... 3
第二章、相關研究........................................................................................................ 5
第一節數位教室環境(Digital Classroom Environment) ........................................ 5
第二節學習檔案...................................................................................................... 6
第三節常見乘法錯誤模式...................................................................................... 7
第四節立即回饋...................................................................................................... 9
第五節其他相關教師監控系統.............................................................................. 9
第三章、三層式學習檔案利用機制與系統設計...................................................... 12
第一節學習檔案的應用與規劃............................................................................ 12
主動訊息回饋功能：主動給予學生提醒及給予老師通知.............................. 13
學生支持與求援功能：提供學生學習檔案與尋求老師協助功能.................. 17
基礎錯誤模式分析功能：分析學生乘法之常見錯誤模式.............................. 20
第二節 DCE 監控流程設計................................................................................... 23
老師活動設定...................................................................................................... 23
學生活動介面...................................................................................................... 24
老師監控介面...................................................................................................... 26
第三節課堂整合設計............................................................................................ 32
課堂活動之相容性.............................................................................................. 32
活動教材的通用性.............................................................................................. 33
第四章、系統實作...................................................................................................... 34
第一節系統環境.................................................................................................... 34
第二節系統功能模組............................................................................................ 36
活動管理模組...................................................................................................... 37
學習檔案管理模組.............................................................................................. 41
監控管理模組...................................................................................................... 47
第五章、系統實測...................................................................................................... 53
第一節系統實測目的............................................................................................ 53
第二節受測對象.................................................................................................... 54
第三節實測流程.................................................................................................... 54
第四節實測數據收集工具.................................................................................... 56
第五節實測記錄分析與系統改進........................................................................ 57
原始版本.............................................................................................................. 58
原始版本實測...................................................................................................... 60
樹狀式結構選單版本實測.................................................................................. 67
校正教師需求版本實測...................................................................................... 71
第六節問卷及訪談分析與結果............................................................................ 73
老師問卷與訪談分析與結果.............................................................................. 73
學生問卷分析與結果.......................................................................................... 89
第六章、討論與未來研究.......................................................................................... 93
第一節討論............................................................................................................ 93
第二節未來研究.................................................................................................... 94
實測限制.............................................................................................................. 94
延伸應用.............................................................................................................. 94
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 96
附錄一、老師問卷...................................................................................................... 99
附錄二、A 班老師訪談問題 .................................................................................... 107
附錄三、B 班老師訪談問題 .................................................................................... 109
附錄四、學生問卷.................................................................................................... 111

參考文獻

區國良、陳國棟 (2001)。教師代理人之知識與策略分析。資訊與教育雜誌。86。30-41。
陳得利 (2002)。網路化歷程檔案系統之設計與實作。國立中山大學資訊管理學習研究所碩士論文。090NSYS5396015。
陳麗玲(民82)。國小數學學習障礙學生計算錯誤類型分析之硏究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學研究所碩士論文。
童宜慧、張基成 (2000)。”網路化學習歷程檔案系統之建構與評鑑－一個電子化的真實性學習評量工具”，遠距教育，13/14，78-90。
Aschermann, J.R. (1999, March). Electronic portfolios: Why? what? how? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX
Barrett, H. (1998). Strategic questions: What to consider when planning for electronic portfolios. Learning and Teaching with Technology, 26(2), 6-13.
Blando, J. A., Kelly, A. E., Schneider, B. R., & Sleeman, D.(1989). Analyzing and modeling　arithmetic errors. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 301-308.
Chan, T. W., Hue, C. W., Chou, C. Y. & Tzeng, O. (2001). Four spaces of network learning models. Computers and Education , pp. 141-161.
Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C.K., Milrad, M., Hoppe, U., and G1:1 MEMBERS (2006) One-to-one technology enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2006, pp.3-29
Chang S. B., Wang H. Y., Liang J. K., Liu T. C. & Chan T. W. (2004) A contest event in the connected classroom using wireless handheld devices. In The 2nd IEEE International Workshopon Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (eds J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, Kinshuk & S. Yang), pp. 207–208. IEEE Publications, JungLi, Taiwan.
Hawkes, M., and Romiszowski A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 283-306.
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
Kulik, J. A., & Kuilk, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning, Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
Liang, J. K., Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Chang, B., Deng, Y. C., Yang, J. C., Chou, C. Y., Ko, H. W., Yang, S., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A Few Design Perspectives on One-on-One Digital Classroom Environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , pp. 181-189.
Liang, J. K., Soper J. C., & Thornton R. M. (2005). Self-paced economics instructions: a large-scale disaggregated evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 181-189.
Moore & Gordon E. (1965). Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits, Electronics, 39,1–4.
Olson, M. W. (1991). Portfolios: Educational tools. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 12(1), 73-80.
Paulson, F.L., Paulson, P.R., & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
Resnick, L. B.(1984). Beyond error analysis: The role of understanding in elementary school　arithmetic. Diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics: Issues, ideas and insights(1984　Research Monograph), 2-14.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York.
Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 129-136.

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-wai Chen)

審核日期

2009-7-19

推文