組織策略與人力資源管理活動配適度對組織績效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：3.133.111.199

姓名

許志隆(Jyh-Long Sheu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

組織策略與人力資源管理活動配適度對組織績效之影響
(Fit of Organizational Strategy and Human Resource Practices with Organizational Performance)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

Porter（1980）提出三種競爭策略(成本策略、差異化策略、集中策略)，並認為成本策略與差異策略無法同時使用；不過在現在的產業之中，降低生產成本已經不再是主要獲利的來源。唯有創造市場上特獨地位，否則組織與競爭者之間將淪為價格競爭。因此同時追求成本策略與差異策略，似乎成為不可避免的趨勢。
本研究探討Porter競爭策略，與人力資源管理活動，對組織績效的影響。以106家台灣公司為樣本。將公司採用的策略分為成本策略、差異策略、完整策略以及無明顯策略。並依因素分析結果，得到高績效以及勞資關係兩類人力資源管理活動。並探討不同策略的採用、人力資源管理活動使用的程度、以及策略與人力資源管理活動的交互作用，對公司資產報酬率以及自評績效的影響。
研究結果指出，傾向差異策略的公司，在資產報酬率上優於沒有明顯策略傾向的公司。而有特定策略傾向的公司，在自評績效上也表現得比沒有策略傾向的公司好。高績效人力資源管理活動，對於資產報酬率，以及自評績效都有提升效果。但是策略和人力資源的交互作用對於組織績效的影響，卻是透過內部效能的中介效果。也就是，策略和人力資源活動的組合，端賴對優秀人才的掌握，並維持組織內部和諧的氣氛，才會對績效有幫助。另一方面，如果公司的人力資源管理活動，徒具形式卻不要求實際成果的話，對組織績效反而有不利的影響。

摘要(英)

Porter (1980) proposed “Generic Strategies” to compete in the whole industry. He claimed that “Differentiation Strategy” would cause some extra expenditure and increase operating cost, and a company could hardly adopt both “Cost-Leadership Strategy” and “Differentiation Strategy” simultaneously. But this conflict argument has been severely criticized in academy and business field since then.
With 106 samples form 1414 companies registered in Taiwan Stock Exchange Corp, this study discussed the impact of Porter’s strategies, human resource practices, and the interaction effects of strategies and HR practices on companies’ financial and non-financial performance. Sample companies were classified into four kinds of strategies, including Cost Strategy, Differentiation Strategy, Complete Strategy and Unobvious Strategy. HR practices were also classified into two sets of activities, HPWS and ER.
By correlation analysis and regression analysis, companies belonging to Differentiation Strategy outperformed Unobvious ones in ROA. And companies would have better self-assessment performance if they adopt specific strategies. HPWS enhanced performance in both ROA and self-assessment performance. Considering the interaction effects of strategies and HR practices on organizational performance, internal efficiency played a critical role through intermediate effect. It meant that organizations benefited by attracting talents and maintaining harmonious working environment even strategies fit HR practices. Finally, impractical HR practices would likely waste organizations’ resources if they are not carried out practically.

關鍵字(中)

★ 競爭策略
★ 人力資源管理活動
★ 配適
★ 中介效果

關鍵字(英)

★ fit
★ HR practices
★ competitive strategy
★ intermediate

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論 1
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節　研究目的 3
第二章　文獻探討 4
第一節　波特的競爭策略 4
一、成本領導策略 4
二、差異化策略 5
三、集中策略 5
四、兩種策略的取捨 6
第二節　人力資源管理活動與組織績效之連結 8
一、人力資源管理活動的重要性 8
二、高績效工作系統 10
第三節　人力資源管理活動與組織策略之配適 13
一、組織策略與人力資源活動的關係 13
二、人力資源管理活動的外部配適與組織績效之關係 16
第三章　研究方法 19
第一節　研究架構 19
第二節　資料來源 20
一、樣本來源 20
二、樣本特性 20
三、問卷設計 22
第三節　變數衡量 24
一、自變數 24
二、依變數 32
三、控制變數 33
第四節　分析工具 33
一、述性統計分析 33
二、單因子變異數分析 33
三、因素分析 33
四、階層迴歸分析 34
第四章　研究結果與討論 35
第一節　策略與人力資源管理活動的關聯 35
第二節　策略、人力資源管理活動與組織績效之關聯 38
一、策略、人力資源管理活動與組織績效的相關分析 38
二、策略、人力資源管理活動與組織績效的迴歸分析 40
三、研究小結 43
第五章　結論與建議 50
第一節　結論 50
第二節　研究限制 52
第三節　後續研究建議 53
第四節　管理意涵 53
附錄一　策略問卷 62
附錄二　人力資源管理活動問卷 65

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部份
1. 黃家齊，2000。人力資源管理系統內部契合與組織績效之關聯性研究，中山管理評論，第8卷，第3期：511-536。
2. 黃家齊，2002。人力資源管理系統與組織績效－智慧資本觀點，管理學報，第19卷，第3期：415-450。
3. 陳世哲，許淑君，1999。競爭策略、人力資源管理系統與組織績效之研究，亞太管理評論，第4卷，第4期：413-429。
4. 黃同圳，1997。人力資源策略與組織績效關係探討：權變觀點在台灣企業之檢證，Hong Kong Journal of Business Management，第15期:79-100。
5. 何永福 & 楊國安，1993。人力資源策略管理，台北市，三民書局。
6. 湯明哲，2002。策略精論，台北市，天下文化。
英文部份
1. Allan Bird & Schon Beechler, 1995. Links Between Business Strategy and Human Resource Management in U.S.-Based Japanese Subsidiaries: An empirical investigation, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3):23-46.
2. Alan I. Murray, 1988. A Contingency View of Porter’s “Generic Strategies”, The Academy of Management Review, 13(3): 390-400.
3. Arnaldo Camuffo & Giovanni Costa, 1993. Strategic Human Resource Management-Italian Style, Sloan Management Review, 34(2):59-67.
4. Arthur, J.B., 1992. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45:488-506.
5. Arthur, J. B., 1994. Effects on human resources systems on manufacturing performance and turnover, The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670-687.
6. Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17:99-120.
7. Batt,R.,2000.Strategic segmentation in front-line services: matching customers, employees and human resource systems, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(3): 540-561.
8. Butler, J. E., Ferris, G. R., Napier, N.K., 1991. Strategy and human resources management, Cincinnati, South-Western.
9. Cappelli P., Singh, H., 1992. Integrating strategic human resources and strategic management. In D. Lewin, O.S. Mitchell, & PD. Sherer(Eds), Research frontiers in industrial relations and human resources,:165-192. Madison, WI:Industrial Relationas Research Association.
10. Casey Ichniowski, Kathryn Shaw, Giovanna Prennushi, 1997. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of Steel finishing lines, The American Economic Review, 87(3):291-313.
11. Christine T Kydd, Lynn Oppeheim, 1990. Using Human Resource Management to Enhance Competitiveness: Lessons from Four Excellent Companies, Human Resource Management, 29(2): 145-166.
12. Charles W. L. Hill，1988。Differentiation Versus Low Cost or Differentiation or Low Cost: A contingency Framework，The Academy of Management Review,13(3):401-412.
13. Corsten Hans, Will Thomas, 1993. Reflections on competitive strategy and its impact on modern production concepts, Management International Review, 33(4): 315-334.
14. John E. Delery & D. Harold Doty, 1996. Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions, Academy of Journal, 39(4):802-835.
15. Delaney, John T., Huselid, Mark A., 1996. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance, The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-969.
16. Eileen Appelabum, Rosemary Batt, 1994. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States, Itbaca and London, Cornell University Press.
17. Eileen Appelbaum, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, Arne L. Kalleberg, 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press.
18. Gareth R. Jones & John E. Butler，1988. Costs, Revenue, and Business-Level Strategy, The Academy of Management Review, 13(2):202-212.
19. Hall, W. K., 1980. Survival strategies in a hostile environment, Harvard Business Review, 58(5): 75-85.
20. Helms, Marilyn M., Haynes, Paula J., Cappel, Sam D., 1992. Competitive Strategies and Business Performance Within the Retailing Industry, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 20(5):3-14.
21. Jay B. Barney, Patrick M. Wright, 1998. On Becoming a strategic partner: The Role of Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advantage, Human Resource Management, 37 (1): 31-46.
22. Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds), Annual review of psychology, 46: 237-264. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
23. Jill E. Perry-Smith, Terry C. Blum, 2000. Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance, The Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1107-1117.
24. Johnseok Bae & John J. Lawler，2003。ORGANIZATIONAL AND HRM STRATEGIES IN KOREA：IMPACT ON FIRM PERFORMANCE IN AN EMERGING ECONOMY，The Academy of Management Journal,43(3):502-517.
25. Johnseok Bae & Shrh-jer Chen & Tai Wai David Wan & John J. Lawler and Fred Ochieing Walumbwa，2003. Human resource strategy and firm performance in Pacific Rim countries，International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(8):1308-1332.
26. Jones, G. R., Wright, P. M., 1992. An economic approach to conceptualizing the utility of human resource management practices. In K. Rowland j& G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, 10: 271-300. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Kathryn Martell & Stephen J. Carroll, 1995. How Strategic is HRM?. Human Resource management, 34(2): 253-267.
28. Lloyd Baird, Ilan Meshoulam, 1988. Managing two fits of strategic human resource management, The Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 116-128.
29. Mak & Akhtar，2003.Human Resource Management Practices, Strategic Orientations, and Company Performance: A Correlation Study of Publicly Listed Companies, Journal of American Academy of Business, 2(2):510-515.
30. Mark A. Youndt, Scott A. Snell, James W. Dean, JR., David P. Lepak, 1996. Human Resource Management, manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 836-866.
31. Mark A. Huselid, 1995. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3):635-672.
32. Michael E. Porter， 1985， Competitive Advantage：Creating Sustaining Superior Performance, N. Y.：The Free Press.
33. Michael E. Porter，1996，What Is Strategy？HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW : 61-78.
34. Michael E. Porter, 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, N. Y.: The Free Press.
35. Pao-Long Chang & Wei-Ling Chen, 2002. The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from High-tech Firms in Taiwan, International Journal of Management, 19(4): 622-631.
36. Patrick M. Wright, Timothy M. Gardner, Lisa M. Moynihan, 2003. The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units, Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3): 21-36.
37. Patrick M. Wright & Gary C. McMahan, 1992. Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 18(2):295-320.
38. Peter Lorange, 1986. Human Resource Management in Multinational Cooperative Ventures, Human Resource management, 25(1):133-148.
39. Peter Boxall, 2003. HR Strategy and competitive advantage in the service sector, Human Resource Management, 13(3):5-9.
40. Pradeep Gopalakrishna, Ram Subramanian, 2001. Revisiting the pure versus hybrid dilemma: Porter’s generic strategies in a developing economy, Journal of Global Marketing, 15(2):61.
41. Randall S. Schuler & John R. Fulkerson & Peter J. Dowling, 1991. Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Multinational Corporations, Human Resource Management, 30(3):365-392.
42. Reed, Richard, DeFillippi, Robert J., 1990. Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 88-102.
43. Roderick E. White, 1986. Generic Business Strategies, Organizational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Strategic Management Journal, 7(3):217-231.
44. Simon K M Mak, Syed Akhtar, 2003. Human resource management practices, strategic orientations, and company performance: A correlation study of publicly listed companies, Journal of American Academy of Business, 2(2): 510-515.
45. Svatopluk Hlavacka & Ljuba Bacharova & Viera Rusnkova & Robert Wanger, 2001.Performance implications of Porter's generic strategies in Slovak hospitals, Journal of Management in Medical,15(1):44.
46. Ulrich, D., 1991. Using Human Resources for competitive advantage, San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
47. Wright, P. M., MaMahan, G. C., 1992. Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18: 295-320.
48. Raymond E. Miles, Charles C. Snow, 1984. Fit, Failure And The Hall of Fame, California Management Review, 14(3): 10-28.
49. Werner H. Braun & Malcolm Warner, 2002. Strategic human resource management in western multinationals in China, Strategic human resource management, 31(5):553-579.
50. Wright, Patrick M., Smart, Dennis L., McMahan, Gary C., 1995. Matches between human resources and strategy among NCAA basketball teams, The Academy of Management Journal, 38(4): 1052-1074.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2004-6-25

推文