員工之持股狀態與心裡所有權關係之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：48

、訪客IP：3.133.152.153

姓名

陳建鎧(Chien-Kai Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

員工之持股狀態與心裡所有權關係之探討
(Exploring The Relationship between Employees' Stock Holding and Psychological Ownership)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來股票分紅制被視為一種激勵員工的有效方法，並且廣泛的被使用，許多公司也越來越將股票分工制度視為常態，將員工納為股東的這種概念被視為是一種將所有權以及激勵制度的連結。學者發現員工分紅制度能夠帶來組織的績效改善以及增進財務上的表現。此外，學者Wagner等人發現心裡所有權這種現象將對組織中的財務績效有明顯的相關程度。因此，心裡所有權極有可能是員工正式所有權以及其績效的催化劑。也就是說，有心裡所有權的員工比沒有心裡所有權的員工在績效表現上會展現的比較好。所以，瞭解正式所有權以及心裡所有權之間的微妙關係以及如何形成心裡所有權，將是本研究的動機與目的。
本研究以國內一家高科技產業公司之間接員工為研究對象，共計發放610份問卷，有效問卷400份，有效回收率65.5％，並利用統計方法驗證員工持股狀態及偏好與其心裡所有權之關係
結果顯示心裡所有權是一個多因素的概念，而且其具有階段性的形成，從所有權信念帶出所有權行為，由所有權信念帶出所有感，另外，財務所有權以及股票持有偏好都會對員工的心裡所有權有正向顯著的影響。

摘要(英)

Psychological ownership has become a vital element to motivate and inspire the associates in high-tech firms. It has been stressed that employees’ psychological ownership emergences play a momentous role to stimulate the performance of the organization. Especially, psychological ownership would be significantly important for high-tech specialists when they perform the role of major producers. On the other hand, enterprises also take employee stock ownership as an efficient means to motivate the workers of the organizations. This would provide a charming benefit and improve organizational performance by motivating employees to promote their shared financial interests with the organization.
Based on reviewing literature, this research will try to provide a general understanding on financial ownership and psychological ownership. We propose that psychological ownership may be influenced by two specific factors, financial ownership and stock holding preference. Therefore, firms should let the employees hold the company’s stock for as long as possible. In addition, corporations should do their best to suggest that the employees keep as much of the company’s stock as they can. Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) have been considered useful tools to raise the performance of organizations. Nevertheless, many of the researches in ESOPs failed to link employees’ stock holding status with performance directly, but many studies in psychological ownership do impact performance explicitly.
Focusing on the final results, this study will state about how employees’ stock holding status influences their psychological ownership. We categorize employees’ stock holding status as two indicators: stock percentage of an employee’s property, and stock percentage of an employee’s annual compensation and rewards. Moreover, we classify psychological ownership as three groups: feeling of possession, belief, and behavior. We predict that these two types of stock holding statuses have differentiated, as well as complementary, influence on the three classifications of employees’ psychological ownership.
On account of preliminary thought, a more abundant and explicit research framework is developed. The theoretical hypotheses are also tested against an empirical data set. We conducted a survey of 610 employees who are working at one individual high-tech company in Taiwan. Eventually, a data set contains 400 associates in our sample. Our findings indicate that stock percentage of an employee’s property and stock percentage of an employee’s annual compensation and rewards have significantly positive effects on employees’ beliefs in psychological ownership. Besides, employees’ beliefs and behaviors in psychological ownership will influence their feelings of possession in psychological ownership. Hence, our results show that there is a positive relationship between employees’ stock holding status with their psychological ownership.

關鍵字(中)

★ 持股偏好
★ 心裡所有權

關鍵字(英)

★ ESOPs
★ stock holding preference
★ psychological ownership

論文目次

Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2-1 The Meaning of Ownership and Employee Stock Ownership 4
2-2 The Privileges of Ownership 7
2-3 Psychological Ownership 14
2-4 The Relationship between Ownership and Psychological Ownership 19
Chapter 3 Methodology 21
3-1 Research Hypotheses 21
3-2 Research Framework 25
3-3 Data Source 25
3-4 Measures and Operational Definition 27
3-5 Data Analysis 29
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 30
4-1 Measurement model of the construct of Psychological Ownership 30
4-2 Structural Model 34
4-3 Discussion 37
Chapter 5 Conclusion 41
5-1 Limitations 41
5-2 Future Research Directions 42
5-3 Managerial Implications 44
Reference 47
List of Figures
Figure 1 Conceptual Framework 25
Figure 2 Measurement Model 33
Figure 3 Theoretical Model 35
Figure 4 Comparative Model 35
List of Tables
Table 1 Ownership Rights and Privileges Across Four Fields 8
Table 2 Demographic Statistics 26
Table 3 Covariance Analysis 30
Table 4 Results of Three Factors Confirmatory Factor Analysis 31
Table 5 Indices of Goodness of Fit for Each Measurement Model 33
Table 6 Indices of Goodness of Fit for Each Structural Model 34

參考文獻

ACA News. 1999. More companies give stock options to broad number of employees. September 9:12.
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 599-617.
Ames, J. B. 1913. The Disseisin of Chattles. In Lectures in Legal History, 172-191. Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. 1988.Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411-423.
Aoki, M. 1984. The co-operative game theory of the firm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Phillips, L. W. 1982. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construct. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 459-489.
Bearden, P. M., Sharma, S., & Teel J. E., 1982 Sample size effects of chi-square and other statistics used in evaluating Causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396-402.
Belk, R. W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer research, 15: 139-168.
Bentler P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indices in the structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238-246.
Bentler P. M. & Bonett, D. G. 1980. Signficance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588-606.
Berle, A., & Means, G. 1933. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
Blackstone, W. 1971. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 11th ed. London.
Brown, T. L. 1989. What will it take to win? Industry Week, June 19: 15.
Brown, S., Fakhfakh, F., & Sessions, J. 1999. Absenteeism and employee profit sharing: An empirical analysis based on French panel data, 1981-1991. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52: 234-251.
Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. 1992. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Social Methods and Research, 16: 64-73.
Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R.1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA, Long JS (eds.) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Case. J. 1995. Open-book management. New York: Harper Business.
Clemens, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Coff, R., Rousseau, D. M. 2000. Sustainable competitive advantage from relational wealth. In C. R. Leana & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Relational wealth: The advantages of stability in a changing economy: 27-48. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. 1981. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpepper R.A., Gamble J. E. & Blubaugh M.G., 2004. Employee stock ownership plans and three-component commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Leicester: June. 77:155-170.
Dittmar, H. 1992. The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Dreyfus H. L., 1991. Being-in-the-world: A Commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Druskat V. U. & Pescosolido, A. T. 2002. The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning, and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55: 283-314.
Duncan, N. G. 1981. Home ownership and social theory. In J. S. Duncan (Ed.) Housing and identity: Cross-cultural perspectives: 98-134. London: Croom Helm.
Durkheim, E. 1957. Professional ethics and civil morals. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Eagly A. H. & Chaiken, S. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcount Brace Jovanovich.
Ferrante, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2001. Bringing open book management into the academic line of sight: Sharing the firm’s financial with workers. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior, 8: 97-116. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Furby, L. 1978a. Possessions: Toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.) Life span development and behavior, 1: 297-336. New York: Academic Press.
Furby, L. 1978b. Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1): 49-65.
Galve Górriz, C., & Salas Fumás, V. 1996. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Some Empirical Evidence from Spain. Managerial and Decision Economics (1986-1998), 17: 575-586.
Gilpin, K. N. 1999. Workers ready to cash in as UPS goes public. New York Times, November 11: A1, C10.
Greenwood, D. & Gonzales Santos, J. L. 1992. Industrial democracy as process: Participatory action research in the Fagor Cooperative Group of Mondragon. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
Hammer, T. H., & Stern, R. M. 1980. Employee ownership: Implications for the organizational distribution of power. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 78-100.
Harquail, C. V. 1998. Organizational identification and the “Whole Person”: Integrating Affect, Behavior, and Cognition. Identification with Organizations. 223-231. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hart, O. 1995. Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Holderness, C. G. 2003. A survey of Blockholders and Corporate Control. Economic Policy Review, April, 51-64.
Isaacs, S. 1933. Social development in young children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
James, W. 1980. The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom D., 1989. LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.
Keef, S. P. 1998. The causal association between employee share ownership and attributes: A study based on the Long framework. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36: 73-82.
Kelman, H. C. 1958. Compliance, identification and internalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 51-60.
Kline, L. & France, C. 1899. The psychology of mine. Pedagogical Seminary & Genetic Psychology, 6(4): 421-470.
Koretz, G. 1999. ESOP benefits are no fables. Business Week, September 6:26.
Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. 1994. Entrepreneurial potiential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18: 91-104.
Kubzansky, P. E., & Druskat, V. U. 1993. Psychological sense of ownership in the workplace: Conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
Kuvaas B., 2003 Employee ownership and affective organizational commitment: employees’ perceptions of fairness and their preference for company shares over cash. Scandinavian Journal of Management, Scand. J. Mgmt. 19:193-212.
LaPorta, R., Lopex-DeSilanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. 2000. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55: 1-33.
Lawriwsky, M. L. 1984. Some Tests of the Influence of Control Type on the Market for Corporate Control in Australia. The Journal of Industrial Economics, March, 32(3): 277-291
Leana, C. R., & Rousseau, D. M. 2000. Relational wealth: The advantages of stability in a changing economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, E., Warning, S., Weigand, J. 2004. Governance Structures, Multidimensional Efficiency and Firm Profitability. Journal of Management and Governance, 8: 279-304.
Long R. J. 1978a. The effects of employee ownership on organizational identification, employee job attitudes, and organizational performance: A tentative framework and empirical findings. Human Relations, 31: 29-48.
Lowenstein, R. 1996. Corporate governance’s sorry history. Wall Street Journal, April, 18: Cl.
Maruyama G. M., 1998. Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marx, K. 1976. The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed.). (Edited by R. C. Tucker.) New York : Norton.
McClelland, D. 1951. Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
McCoy, T. J. 1996. Creating an “open-book” organization. New York: Amacom.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Gellatly, I. R. 1990. Affective and continuance commitment to organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 710-720.
Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1: 69-89.
Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. 1997. Commitment in the workplace: Theory research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mikes, R. E., & Creed, W. E. D. 1995. Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17: 333-372.
Nadler, R. 1998. Stocks populi : As workers join the investing class, American may undergo apolitical realignment. National Review, March, 9: 36-39.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
Naisbitt, J., & Aburdene, P. 1985. Re-inventing the corporation. New York: Warner Books.
O’Reilly C. 2002. Are we any better at managing people? Retrieved February 27, 2003from http://www.conference-borad.org/publication/atb/articles/oreillySep02.cfm.
Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. 2003. Ownership Structure and Value of the Largest European Firms: The Importance of Owner Identity. Journal of Management and Governance; 7: 27-55.
Peter, J. P. 1979. Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16: 6-17.
Peter, J. P. 1981. Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 20-37.
Pierce, J. L., & Furo, C. A. 1990.Employee ownership: Implications for management. Organizational Dynamics, 18: 32-43
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. 2001. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review; April, 26(2): 298-310.
Pierce, J. L., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Coghlan, A. 2004. Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control. The Journal of Social Psychology; October, 144(5): 507-534.
Pierce, J. L., & Rodgers, L. 2004. The Psychological Ownership and Worker-Owner Productivity. Group & Organization Management. October, 29(5): 588-613.
Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. 1991. Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review; January, 16(1): 121
Rousseau, D. M., & Shperling Z. 2003. Pieces of The Action: Ownership and The Changing Employment Relationship. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 553-570.
Rudmin, F. W., and Berry 1987, J. W. Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record, 37: 257-268.
Semler, R. 1993. Maverick: The success story behind the world’s most unusual workplace. New York: Time Warner Books.
Shleifer, A ., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737-783.
Shperling, Z Rousseau, D.M., & Ferrante, C. J. 2003.Ownership in high technology firms: Israel and U.S. Technical report. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management.
Smith, J. C. 1976. Legal Obligation. The Athlone Press, University of London.
Steiger J. H., 1990 Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral research, 25: 173-180.
Tannenbaum, A. S. 1983. Employee-owned companies. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15: 235-268.
Trucker L. R. & Lewis, C. 1973. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38: 1-10.
Tuschke, A., Sanders, W. G., 2003. Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Governance Reform: The Case of Germany. Strategic Management, 24(7): 631-650.
Vroom, V. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., & Christiansen, N. D. 2003. Employees That Think and Act Like Owners: Effects of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational Effectiveness. Personnel Psychology; Winter, 56(4): 847-871.
Weil, S. 1952. The need for roots: Prelude to a declaration of duties towards mankind. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wolf, M. 2001. Taking other peoples’ money: Stock options are not an efficient stimulus to executive performance but an effective way to transfer wealth in a bull market. Financial Times. January 10: 21.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2005-7-14

推文