博碩士論文 944207009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:37 、訪客IP:3.16.139.138
姓名 沈富鈞(Fu-jyun Shen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 實施多源評量成功因素、受評者接受度知覺與受評者自我才能發展意圖關聯性之研究
(The Relationship Study between Successful Factors of Multi-Sources Appraisal, Ratees’ Perceived Acceptance and Ratees’ Intention to Self Development)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 協助員工瞭解自己、進行自我才能發展,進而達成組織目標,是企業執行360度評量制度的主要目的。雖然企業在評量制度的設計與執行上盡量貼近理論的架構,但是受評者對評量制度的態度仍無法完全確認,連帶的也影響了受評者運用回饋報告進行個人才能發展的意圖。在理論上,受評者對評量結果的態度可用接受性知覺作為衡量標準,當受評者對於評量制度與結果有越高的接受性知覺時,代表受評者會有較高的意願運用回饋報告進行個人發展行為。
本研究針對曾在執行過360度評量的公司當中扮演受評者角色的人員進行調查,運用因素分析、相關分析、階層迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析。研究結果發現,受評者的「評量技術認知」與「評量來源能力認知」對受評者的接受性知覺會有顯著影響;而受評者接受性知覺在「整體保密認知」、「評量技術認知」與「評量來源能力認知」與受評者自我才能發展意圖之間,具備有部分的中介效果存在。最後根據本研究的研究結果提出管理意涵與實務運用上的建議。
摘要(英) 360 degree appraisal is a tool that can assist ratees in enhancing their abilities and changing their behaviors. Although enterprises design the process close to the suggestion of theory, the attitude of ratees is still dubitable. In the suggestion of theory, ratees’ perceived acceptance is the critical factor of 360 degree appraisal. If ratees perceived neglect acceptance attitude about appraisal system and feedback report, ratees will have lower intention to enhance abilities and change behaviors.
The results of the study suggest that “perceived appraisal technique” and “perceived abilities of raters in appraisal” is key factor to ratees’ perceived acceptance attitude. When ratees experience higher “perceived appraisal technique” and “perceived abilities of raters in appraisal”, ratees will have higher perceived acceptance attitude. And ratees’ perceived acceptance attitude to 360 degree appraisal possesses mediator effect between perceived confidentiality, perceived appraisal technique, perceived abilities of raters’ and ratees’ intention to self development.
關鍵字(中) ★ 受評者接受度知覺
★ 自我才能發展意圖
★ 360度評量
關鍵字(英) ★ ratees’ perceived acceptance
★ ratees’ intention to self development
★ key factors of 360 degree appraisal
論文目次 摘要 i
目 錄 iv
表 目 錄 v
圖 目 錄 v
第一章 序 論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 360度評量制度的意義 5
第二節 影響受評者態度的因素探討 9
第三節 受評者態度知覺之中介效果 25
第三章 研究方法 28
第一節 研究架構 28
第二節 研究對象 30
第三節 研究流程 32
第四節 研究工具 33
第五節 統計分析方法 37
第四章 研究結果 38
第一節 因素分析 38
第二節 信度分析 44
第三節 敘述性統計分析 45
第四節 相關分析 47
第五節 評量投入面與受評者態度之迴歸分析 48
第六節 受評者態度之中介效果分析 50
第五章 研究結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 討論 55
第三節 管理實務意涵與應用 57
第四節 研究限制 59
第五節 研究建議 60
參考文獻 62
參考文獻 (一) 中文部分
林文政、鄧國宏、劉麗華,2006年,影響銀行主管管理職能評鑑認知因素的探索研究,中山管理評論,頁713-750。
紀原欽,2001年,人力資源專業人員對專業才能評量多源回饋之態度影響因素探討-以電子業為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
徐崇文,2000年,以360度回饋探討影響主管人員行為改變意圖相關因素之實證研究,國立政治大學心理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
袁國森,1996年,績效評量中之程序公平及分配公平認知對員工對績效評量態度之影響-以中華電信某分公司為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
劉麗華,2001年,主管管理才能評量360度回饋對受評者態度之影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
蔡慶堂,2002年,主管管理才能評鑑360度回饋對受評者態度之影響-以在臺某外商化工廠為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
(二) 英文部分
Adamik, R.J, (2003). The practice and theory of multirater feedback evaluations in public sector management, unpublished manuscript, school of public affairs and health administration, university of La Verne, California.
Antonioni, D, (1993). Upward appraisals for managers, Industrial Management, 35(6):20-23.
Antonioni, D, (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings, Personnel Psychology, 47(2):349-357.
Antonioni, D, (1996). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process, Organizational Dynamics, 25(3):24-29.
Arvey, R.D, Murphy, K.R, (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings, Annual Review of Psychology, 49:141-169.
Ashford, S.J, (1986). Feedback-seeking as an individual adaptation: a resource perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 29:465-487.
Atwater, L E, Roush, P, Fischthal, A, (1995). The influence of upward feedback on self and follower ratings of leadership, Personnel Psychology, 48(1):35-59.
Atwater, L.E, Waldman, D.A, Atwater, D, Cartier, P, (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates, Personnel Psychology, 53(2):275-297.
Atwater, L.E, Brett, J.F, (2005). 360-Degree Feedback to Leaders: Does it Relate to Changes in Employee Attitudes? Group & organization management, 31(5):578-600.
Banks, C.G, Roberson, L, (1985). Performance appraisers as test developers, The Academy of Management Review, 10(1):128-143.
Barclay, J.H, Harland, L.K, (1995). Peer Performance Appraisals: The Impact of Rater Competence, Rater Location, and Rating correctability on Fairness Perceptions, Group & Organization Management, 20(1):39-60.
Baron, R.M, Kenny, D.A, (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction on Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statisticals Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173-1182.
Bernardin, H.J, (1979). Rater training: A critique and reconceptualization, Academy of Management Proceedings: 216-220.
Bernardin, H.J, Buckley, M.R, (1981). Strategies in rater training, The Academy of Management Review, 6(2): 205-213.
Bernardin, H.J, Orban, J.A, Carlyle, J.J, (1981). Performance ratings as a function of trust in appraisal, purpose for appraisal, and rater individual differences, Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 3111-315
Bernardin, H.J, Beatty, W.R, (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work, Boston: Kent publishing.
Bernardin, H.J, Beatty, W.R, (1987). Can subordinate appraisals enhance managerial productivity, Sloan Management Review, 28(4):63-74.
Bernardin, H.J, Dahmus, S.A, Redmon, G, (1993). Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):315-324.
Bettenhausen, K.L, Fedor, D.B, (1997). Peer and upward appraisal: A comparison of their benefits and problems, Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):236-264.
Fedor, D.B, Bettenhausen, K.L, Davis, W, (1999). Peer review: Employees’ dual roles as raters and recipients, Group & Organization Management, 24(1):92-121.
Blau, P.M, (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & sons.
Bracken, D.W, (1994). Straight talk about multirater feedback, Training and Development, 44-51.
Brinberg, D, Castell, P, (1982). A resource exchange theory approach to interpersonal interaction: A test of Foa’s theory, Journal of applied Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2):260-271.
Brutus, S, London, M, Martineau, J, (1999). The impact of 360 feedback on planning for career development, The Journal of Management Development, 18(8):676-693.
Bohl, D.L, (1996). Minisurvey: 360-degree appraisal yield superior results, survey shows, Compensation and Benefit Review, 28(5):16-20.
Brutus, S, Derayeh, M, (2002). Multisource assessment program in organizations: an insider’s perspective, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2):187-202.
Cascio, W.F, (1992). Managing human resources: productivity, quality of work life, profits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Church, A.H, Bracken, D.W, (1997). Advancing the state of the art of 360-degree feedback, Group & Organization Management, 22(2):149-160.
Church, A.H, Rogelberg, S.G, Waclawski, J, (2000). Since when is no news good news: the relationship between performance and response rates in multirater feedback, Personnel Psychology, 53(2):435-451.
Craig, S.B, Hannum, K, (2006). Research update: 360-degree performance assessment, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(2):117-126.
Curtis, B.A, Harvey, D.R, Ravden, D, (2005). Sources of political distortions in performance appraisal: appraisal purpose and rater accountability, Group & Organization Management, 30(1):42-61.
Denisi, A.S, Kluger, A.N, (2000). Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisal be improved, Academy of Management Executive,14(1):129-140.
Denisi, A.S, Cafferty, T.P, Meglino, B.M, (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: a model and research proposition, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(3):360-397.
Denisi, A.S, Kluger, A.N, (2000). Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisals be improved?Academy of Management Executive, 14(1):129-141.
Dipboye, R.L, Pontbriand, R.D, (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2):248-253.
Dominick, P.G, Reilly, R.R, McGourty, J.W, (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior, Group & Organization studies, 22(4):508-520.
Dunnette, M.D, (1993). My hammer on your hammer, Human Resource Management, 32:373-384.
Edwards, M.R, Ewen, A.J, (1996).360 Feedback: The powerful new model for employee & performance improvement. New York: AMACOM. p.70
Eisenberger, R, Hunttington, R, Hutchison, S, Sowa, D, (1986). Perceived organizational support, Journal of applied Psychology, 71(3):500-508.
Facteau, C.L, Facteau, J.D, Schoel, L.C, Russell, J.E.A, Poteet, M.L, (1998). Reactions of leaders to 360 degree feedback from subordinates and peers, Leadership Quarterly, 9(4):427-448.
Fedor, D.B, Bettenhausen, K.L, Davis, W, (1999). Peer reviews: Employee’s dual roles as raters and recipients, Group & Organization Management, 24(1):92-121.
Fisher, C.D, (1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinate: A laboratory investigation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5):533-540.
Fletcher, C, (1997). Self-awareness - a neglected attribute in selection and assessment, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(3):183-187.
Fletcher, C, Bailey, C, (2003). Assessing self-awareness: some issues and methods, Journal of Management Psychology, 18(5):395-404.
Ford, M.W, Evans, J.R, (2006). The role of follow-up in achieving results from self-assessment processes, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(6):589-606.
Funderburg, S.A, Lvey, P.E, (1997). The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes, Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):210-236.
Furnham, A, Stringfield, P, (1998). Congruence in job-performance ratings: a study of 360(degree) feedback examining self, manager, peers, and consultant ratings, Human Relations, 51(4):517-530.
Garavan, N.T, Morley, M, Flynn, M, (1997). 360 degree feedback:its role in employee development, Journal of Management Development, 16(2):134-147.
Glen, R.M, (1990). Performance appraisal: an unnerving yet useful process, Public Personnel Management, 19:1-10.
Gorsuch, R.L, (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gosselin, A, Werner, J.M, Halle, N, (1997). Ratee preference concerning performance management and appraisal, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4):315-332.
Grant, R.M, (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 18:109-123.
Greenberg, J, (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2):340-342.
Halperin, K, Snyder, C.R, Shenkel, R.J, Houston, B.K, (1976). Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(7):85-88.
Hazucha, J.F, Hezlett, S.A, Schneider, R.J, (1993). The impact of 360 degree feedback management skills development, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):325-352.
Harris, M.M, Smith, D.E, Champagne, D, (1995). A field study of performance appraisal purpose: research- versus administrative-based ratings, Personnel Psychology, 48: 151-160.
Hazucha, J.F, Hezlett, S.A, Schneider, R.J, (1993). The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):325-351.
Hedge, J.W, Kavanagh, M.J, (1988). Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: comparison of three methods of performance appraiser training, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1):68-74.
Hedge, J.w, Teachout, M.S, (2000). Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures, Group & Organization Management, 25(1):22-44.
Ilgen ,D.R, Knowlton, W.A, (1980). Performance attribution effects on feedback from supervisors, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25(3):441-456.
Ilgen, D.R, Fisher, C.D, Taylor, M.S, (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organization, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4):349-371.
James, R. Larson, Jr, (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1):42-77.
Jawahar, M, Williams, C.R, (1997). Where all the children are above average: the performance appraisal purpose effect, Personnel Psychology, 50(4):905-926.
Juran, J.M, (1989). Juran on Leadership for Quality. The Free Press, New York, NY.
Klimoski, R, Inks, I, (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 45: 194-208.
Kozlowski, S.W.J, Farr, J.L, (1988). An integrative model of updating and performance, Human Performance, 1(1):5-29.
Lawler, E.E, (1967). The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(5):369-383.
Landy, F.J, Barnes, J, Murphy, K.R, (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6):751-754.
Landy, F.J, Farr, J.L, (1980). Performance rating, Psychological Bulletin, 87:72-107.
Larson, J.R Jr, (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33:42-76.
Lepsinger, R, Lucia, D.A, (1997). 360 degree feedback and performance appraisal, Training, 34(9):62-68.
Levinson, H, (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4):370-390.
Levy, P.E, Cawley, B.D, Foti, R.J, (1998). Reactions to appraisal discrepancies: performance ratings and attributions, Journal of Business and Psychology, 12:437-455.
Locher, H.A, Teel, S.K, (1988). Appraisal trends, Personnel Journal, 67(9):139-143.
London, M, Smither, J.W, Adsit, D. J, (1997). Accountability, Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):162-184.
London, M, Wohlers, A.J, Gallagher, P, (1990). A feedback approach to management development, Journal of Management Development, 9(6):17-32.
London, M, Beatty, R, (1993). 360 degree feedback as a competitive advantage, Human Resource Management, 32:352-373.
London, M, Mone, E.M, Scott, J.C, (2004). Performance management and assessment: methods for improved rater accuracy and employee goal setting, Human Resource Management, 43(4):319-336.
March, G.J, Simon, A.H, (1958). Organizations. New York:Wiley.
Maurer, T.J, Tarulli, B.A, (1996). Acceptance of peer/upward performance appraisal systems: role of work context factors and beliefs about managers’ development capability, Human Resource Management, 35(2):83-108.
McCarthy, A.M, Garavan, T.N, (2001). 360 degrees feedback process: performance, improvement and employee career development, Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(1):5-33.
Milliman, F.J, Zawacki, F.R, Norman, C, Powell, L, Kirksey, J, (1994). Companies evaluate employees from all perspectives, Personnel Journal, 73(11):99-104.
Morgan, A, Cannan, K, Cullinane, J, (2005). 360 feedback: a critical enquiry, Personnel Review, 34(6):663-680.
Murphy, K.R, Balzer, W.K, Kellam, K.L, Armstrong, J, (1984). Effect of purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1):45-54.
Peter, A.B, Ido, E, Michal, K, Tali, Oref-Chen, (2005). Peer Assessment, Individual Performance, and Contribution to Group Processes: the impact of rater anonymity, Group & Organization Management, 30(4):344-378.
Porter, L.W, Steers, R.M, Mowday, R.T, Boulian, P.V, (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5):603-611.
Romano, C, (1994). Conquering the fear of feedback, HR focus, 71(3):327-341.
Rowson, A, (1998). Using 360 degree feedback instruments up, down, and around the world: Implications for global implementation and use of multi-rater feedback. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6 (1):45-48.
Ryan, A.M, Brutus, S, Greguras, G.J, Hakel, M.D, (2000). Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development, The journal of Management Development, 19(3/4):252-276.
Scott, C.R, Rains, S.A, (2005). Anonymous communication in organizations, Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2):157-197.
Seifert, C.F, Yukl, G, McDonald, R.A, (2003). Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3):561-569.
Shore, L.M, Terick, L.E, (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1:91-109.
Smither, J.W, Wohlers, A.J, London, M, (1995). A field study of reactions to normative versus individual upward feedback, Group & Organization Management, 20:61-89.
Stephane, B, John, W.F, Manuel, L, (1998). Does 360-degree feedback work in different industries? A between-industry comparison of the reliability and validity of multi-source performance ratings, The Journal of Management Development, 17(3):177.
Stoffey, R.W, Reilly, R.R, (1998). Training appraisees to participate in appraisal: effects on appraisers and appraisees, Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(2):219-239.
Stone, E.F, Stone, D.L, (1984). The effects of multiple sources of performance feedback abd feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy, Journal of Management, 10(3):371-378.
Stone, D.L, Gueutal, H.G, Mcintoch, B, (1984). The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy, Personnel Psychology, 37(3):487-507.
Toegel, G, Conger, J.A, (2003). 360-degree assessment: time for reinvention, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3):297-311.
Tornow, W.W,(1993). Perception or reality:Is multi-perceptive measurement a mean or an end?Human Resource Management, 32(2&3), 223-229.
Veslor, E.V, Taylor, S, Leslie, B.J, (1993). An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self—awareness, gender and leaders’ effectiveness, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):249-264.
Waldman, D.A, Bowen, D.E, (1998). The acceptability of 360 degree appraisals: a customer-supplier relationship perspective, Human Resource Management, 37(2):117-130.
Waldman, D.A ,Atwater, L.E, Antonioni, D, (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2):86-94.
Westerman, J.W, Rosse, J.G, (1997). Reducing the threat of rater nonparticipation in 360 degree feedbacksystems: an exploratory examination of antecedents to participation in upward ratings, Group & Organization Management, 22:288-309.
Williams, K.J, DeNisi, A.S, Blencoe, A.G, Cafferty, T.P, (1985). The role of appraisal purpose: effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilization, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(3):314-38.
Walker, A.G, Smither, J.W, (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters, Personnel Psychology, 52(2):393-423.
Woehr, D, (1994). Understanding frame-of-reference training: the impact of training on the recall of performance information, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4):525-534.
Yukl, G, Lepsinger, R, (1995). How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback, Training, 32(12):45-50.
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2007-7-15
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明