實施360度評量影響受評者自我才能發展因素之探討─以某汽車經銷商為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：113

、訪客IP：18.118.121.114

姓名

陳羿璇(Yi-shiuan Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

實施360度評量影響受評者自我才能發展因素之探討─以某汽車經銷商為例
(實施360度評量影響受評者自我才能發展因素之探討─以某汽車經銷商為例)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

一位優秀的管理人員不但能夠激發部屬的潛力，也能對組織產生正向影響，此被視為組織成功的關鍵，近年來，學者與實務界皆建議利用360度回饋的方式進行評估，以協助員工瞭解自己、進行自我才能發展，進而達成組織目標。然而，雖360度評量制度對組織或個人皆有相當大的助益，但在評量制度的設計與執行上，若最終評量結果無法被受評者所接受，受評者便無法透過評量回饋意見或自他評差異來刺激自我才能的發展意圖，以提升工作績效及持續改善。
因此，本研究對象為個案公司中「參與360度評量且擔任受評者角色」的基層及中高階主管，運用因素分析、相關分析、階層迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析，探討影響受評者評量結果接受性知覺及自我才能發展意圖的重要因素。研究結果發現，受評者的「組織信任認知」、「評量來源能力認知」及「回饋建議認知」對受評者的接受性知覺會有顯著影響；「評量溝通認知」對於評量來源能力認知與評量結果接受性知覺間具有干擾效果，高評量溝通認知群組在評量來源能力認知與評量結果接受性知覺間的正向關係較弱；而受評者評量結果接受性知覺在「組織信任認知」、「評量來源能力認知」、「回饋建議認知」及「評量溝通認知」與受評者自我才能發展意圖之間，具有完全及部分的中介效果存在。最後根據本研究的研究結果提出管理意涵與實務運用上的建議。

摘要(英)

An outstanding manager who is regarded as the successful key in the organization not only can stimulate the subordinate’’s potential, also can bring the positive effect to the organization. In recent years, the academia and the enterprise all suggest use 360 degree appraisal to assist ratees in enhancing their abilities, changing their behaviors, and achieving the goals of the business. However, a tool of 360 degree appraisal can help the organization and employee, if ratees perceived neglect acceptance attitude about appraisal system and feedback report, ratees will have lower intention to enhance abilities, change behaviors ceaselessly.
The results of the study suggest that “perceived organizational trust”, “perceived abilities of raters in appraisal”, “perceived abilities of feedback” are key factor to ratees’ perceived acceptance attitude. When ratees experience higher “perceived organizational trust”, “perceived abilities of raters in appraisal”, “perceived abilities of feedback and suggestions”, ratees will have higher perceived acceptance attitude. The moderating effect of perceived appraisal communication between the perceived abilities of raters in appraisal and perceived acceptance attitude is found. And ratees’ perceived acceptance attitude to 360 degree appraisal possesses mediator effect between perceived organizational trust, perceived abilities of raters’, perceived abilities of feedback, perceived appraisal communication and ratees’ intention to self development.

關鍵字(中)

★ 360 度評量
★ 受評者接受度知覺
★ 自我才能發展意圖
★ 組織信任

關鍵字(英)

★ organizational trust
★ ratees’ perceived acceptance
★ key factors of 360 degree appraisal
★ ratees’ intention to self development

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 5
第二章文獻探討 6
第一節 360度評量制度的意義 6
第二節組織信任與360度評量 11
第三節影響受評者對360度評量接受性之因素 17
第四節受評者態度知覺之干擾效果 25
第五節受評者自我才能發展意圖認知 28
第六節人口統計變項與受評者態度之關係 31
第三章研究方法 32
第一節研究架構 32
第二節研究對象 35
第三節研究流程 36
第四節研究工具 37
第五節統計分析方法 41
第四章研究結果 42
第一節因素分析 42
第二節信度分析 50
第三節敘述性統計分析 51
第四節相關分析 54
第五節評量投入面與受評者態度之迴歸分析 55
第六節評量溝通之干擾效果 59
第七節受評者態度之中介效果分析 61
第五章研究結論與建議 65
第一節研究結論 65
第二節討論 70
第三節管理意涵 73
第四節研究限制 77
第五節研究建議 78
參考文獻 79
附錄本研究問卷 87

參考文獻

(一) 中文部分
沈富鈞，2007 年，實施多源評量成功因素、受評者接受度知覺與受評者自我才能發展意圖關聯性之研究，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林鉦棽，1996年，組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究：社會交換理論之觀點，管理科學學報，13卷3 期：391-415。
原凡茹，2002年，影響管理才能評鑑受評者態度之因素探討—以團隊管理者為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
許道然，2000年，組織信任之研究：一個整合性觀點，空大行政學報，11期：253-296。
陳文堂，2004 年，業務人員職能評鑑360度回饋對受評者態度之影響—以某外商藥廠為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
劉麗華，2001 年，主管管理才能評量360 度回饋對受評者態度之影響，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
顏士棻，2005年，個人社會資本、組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究-以心理契約為干擾變項，國立中正大學勞工研究所未出版之碩士論文。
(二) 英文部分
Antonioni, D., 1993. Upward appraisals for managers. Industrial Management, 35(6):20-23.
Antonioni, D., 1994. The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47(2):349-357.
Antonioni, D., 1996. Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organizational Dynamics, 25(3):24-29.
Ashford, S. J., 1986. Feedback-seeking as an individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29:465-487.
Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J., 1992. Does self-other agreement on leadership perception moderate the validity of leadership and performance prediction? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
Atwater, L. E., Brett, J. F., 2005. 360-Degree Feedback to Leaders: Does it Relate to Changes in Employee Attitudes? Group & organization management, 31(5):578-600.
Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, D., & Cartier, P., 2000. An upward feedback field experiment: supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology, 53(2):275-297.
Atwater, L., & Waldman, D., 1998. 360-degree feedback and leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4):423-426.
Banks, C. G., Roberson, L., 1985. Performance appraisers as test developers. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1):128-143.
Bannister, B. D., 1986. Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2): 203-210.
Barclay, J. H., Harland, L. K., 1995. Peer Performance Appraisals: The Impact of Rater Competence, Rater Location, and Rating correctability on Fairness Perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 20(1):39-60.
Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, W. R., 1984. Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work, Boston: Kent publishing.
Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, W. R., 1987. Can subordinate appraisals enhance managerial productivity? Sloan Management Review, 28(4):63-74.
Bernardin, H. J., Dahmus, S. A., & Redmon, G., 1993. Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals. Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):315-324.
Bernstein, B. L., & Lecomte, C., 1979. Supervisor-type feedback effects：Feedback discrepancy level, trainee psychological differentiation, and immediate responses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26:295-303.
Bettenhausen, K. L., & Fedor, D. B., 1997. Peer and upward appraisal: A comparison of their benefits and problems. Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):236-264.
Blau, P., 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York.
Burke, R. J., & Wilcox, D. S., 1969. Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interview. Personnel Psychology, 22: 291-305.
Campion, M. A., Mumford, T. V., & Morgeson, F. P., 2005. Work redesign: Eight obstacles and opportunities. Human Resource Management, 44(4):367-390.
Cardy, L. R., & Dobbins, H. G., 1994. Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western.
Carnevale, D. G., 1998. “Organizational Trust,” in Tay M. Shafritz (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Public and Administration. Westview Press.
Cascio, W. F., 1992. Managing human resources: productivity, quality of work life, profits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Costigan, R. D., Itler, S. S., & Berman, J. J., 1998. A multi-dimension of trust in organization. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(3):303-317.
Craig, S. B., & Hannum, K., 2006. Research Update: 360-Degree Performance Assessment. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Vol. 58(2):117-122.
Creed, W. E. D., & Miles, R. E., 1996. Trust in organization: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 16-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N., 2000. Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisal be improved. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1):129-140.
Denisi, A. S., & Mitchell, J. L., 1978. An analysis of peer ratings as predictors and criterion measures and a proposed new application. Academy of Management Review, 3, 369-374.
Dipboye, R. L., Pontbriand, R. D., 1981. Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2):248-253.
Erez, A., Lepine, J. A., & Elms, H., 2002. Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation on the functioning and effectiveness of self-managed teams: A quasi-experiment. Personnel Psychology, 55( 4): 929-948.
Facteau, C. L., Facteau, J. D., Schoel, L. C., Russell, J. E. A., & Poteet, M. L., 1998. Reactions of leaders to 360 degree feedback from subordinates and peers. Leadership Quarterly, 9(4):427-448.
Fisher, C. D., 1979. Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinate: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5):533-540.
Fletcher, C., & Bailey, C., 2003. Assessing self-awareness: some issues and methods. Journal of Management Psychology, 18(5):395-404.
Fukuyama, F., 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Funderburg, S. A., & Lvey, P. E., 1997. The influence of individual and contextual variables on 360-degree feedback system attitudes. Group &Organization Studies, 22(2):210-236.
Garavan, N.T, Morley, M, Flynn, M, 1997. 360 degree feedback：its role in employee development. Journal of Management Development, 16(2):134-147.
Gosselin, A., Werner, J. M., & Halle, N., 1997. Ratee preference concerning performance management and appraisal. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4):315-332.
Hall, J. L., Leidecker, J. K., & DiMarco, C., 1996. What we know about upward appraisals of management: Facilitation the future use of UPAs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(3):209-226.
Halperin, K., Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., & Houston, B. K., 1976. Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(7):85-88.
Hazuka, F. J., Hezlett, A. S., & Schneider, J. R., 1993. The impact of 360-degreefeedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32(2):325-351.
Hedge, J. w., & Teachout, M. S., 2000. Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures. Group & Organization Management, 25(1):22-44.
Hosmer, L. T., 1995. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2),379-403.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S., 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4):349-371.
James, R., & Larson, J. R., 1984. The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1):42-77.
Jawahar, M., & Williams, C. R., 1997. Where all the children are above average: the performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50(4):905-926.
Jones, R. G., & George, M. J., 1998. The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3):531-547.
Juran, J. M., 1989. Juran on Leadership for Quality. The Free Press, New York, NY.
Kalpan, R. E., 1993. 360-degree feecback plus: Boosting the power of coworker ratings for executives. Human Resource Management, 32:299-314.
Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E., 1978. Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85:555-586.
Landy, F. J., Barnes, J., & Murphy, K. R., 1978. Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6):751-754.
Larson, R. J., Jr, 1984. The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33:42-76.
Lawler, E. E., 1967. The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(5):369-383.
Leanne, A., David, W., Cheri, O., Chet, R., & Karin, M. J., 2005. Self-Other Agreement:Comparing its Relationship with Performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(1):25-40.
Lepsinger, R., & Lucia, D. A., 1997. 360 degree feedback and performance appraisal. Training, 34(9):62-68.
Locher, H. A., & Teel, S. K., 1988. Appraisal trends. Personnel Journal, 67(9):139-143.
London, M., & Beatty, R., 1993. 360 degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 32:352-373.
London, M., Mone, E. M., & Scott, J. C., 2004. Performance management and assessment: methods for improved rater accuracy and employee goal setting. Human Resource Management, 43(4):319-336.
London, M., Smither, J. W., Adsit, D. J., 1997. Accountability. Group & Organization Studies, 22(2):162-184.
London, M., Wohlers, A. J., & Gallagher, P., 1990. A feedback approach to management development. Journal of Management Development, 9(6):17-32.
Luhmann, N., 1979. Trust and Power. New York: Wiley.
Matz, J. E., 1998. Designing succession system for new competitive realities. Human Resource Planning:31-37.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, H., & Schoorman, F. D., 1995. An integative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3):709- 734.
McCarthy M. A., & Garavan N. T., 2007. Understanding acceptance of multisource feedback for management development. Personnel Review, 36(6):903-917.
McCarthy M. A., & Garavan T., 2006. Postfeedback development perceptions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(2):245-278.
McCauley, D. P., & Kuhnert, K. W., 1992. A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 16(3):265-283.
McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H., 1976. Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54(2)
McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F., 1987. User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40:785-797.
Milliman, F. J., Zawacki, F. R., Norman, C., Powell, L., & Kirksey, J., 1994. Companies evaluate employees from all perspectives. Personnel Journal, 73(11):99-104.
Mishra, A. K., 1996. “Organizational Responses to Crisis：The Centrality of Trust,” in R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(eds.). Trust in Organizations：Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications ,261-287.
Mishra, J., & Morrissey, M. A., 1990. Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management, 19: 443-486.
Morgeson, F. P., Mumford, T. V., & Campion, M. A., 2005. Coming full circle: Using research and practice to address 27 questions about 360-degree feedback programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3):196-209.
Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G. P., & Sorcher, M., 1993. Other people’s expectations. Human Resource Management, 32(2ſ):283-297.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N., 1995. Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Nowack, K. M., 1993. 360-Degree Feedback: The whole story. Training and Development Journey, 47(1):69-72.
Nyhan, R. C., 2000, Changing the Paradigm:Trust and Its Role in Public Sector Organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30(1): 87-109.
Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe H. A., 1997. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation review, 21(5)：614-635
Romano, C., 1994. Conquering the fear of feedback. HR focus, 71(3):327-341.
Rotter, J. B., 1980. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 3591:1-7.
Rousseau, S. B., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C., 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
Ryan, A. M., Brutus, S., Greguras, G. J., & Hakel, M. D., 2000. Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development. The journal of Management Development, 19(3/4):252-276.
Seifert, C. F., Yukl, G., & McDonald, R. A., 2003. Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3):561-569.
Simonson, I., & Nye, P., 1992. The Effect of Accountability on Susceptibility to Decision Errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(3), 416-447.
Smither, J. W., Wohlers, A. J., & London, M., 1995. A field study of reactions to normative versus individual upward feedback. Group & Organization Management, 20:61-89.
Stone, E. F., & Stone, D. L., 1984. The effects of multiple sources of performance feedback abd feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy. Journal of Management, 10(3):371-378.
Tang, Thomas Li-Ping and Sarsfield-Baldwin and Linda J., 1996. Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. Advanced Management Journal, 61: 25.
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A., 2003. 360-degree assessment: time for reinvention. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3):297-311.
Tornow, W. W., 1993. Perception or reality：Is multi-perceptive measurement a mean or an end? Human Resource Management, 32(2&3),223-229.
Veslor, E. V., Taylor, S., & Leslie, B. J., 1993. An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self—awareness, gender and leaders’ effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 32(2-3):249-264.
Vinson, N. M., 1996. The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback：Making it work. Training & Development, 50, 11-12.
Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E., 1998. The acceptability of 360 degree appraisals: a customer-supplier relationship perspective. Human Resource Management, 7(2):117-130.
Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D., 1998. Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2):86-94.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R., 1995. How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback. Training, 32(12):45-50.
Zeme, R., & Zemke, S., 1999. Putting Competencies to work. Training, 70-76.
Zucker, L. G., 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-jeng Lin)

審核日期

2008-6-21

推文