摘要(英) |
In virtue of nature resources has downwardly drain away, in order to prevent our ecological system and meanwhile to ensure the sustainable development of humanity.
For the future, the materials use in construction engineering should become more ecological and become friendly for our environment.
Nowadays, the exploration of sandstones resources in our country has become complicated problem to be solved. A burgeon of automobile industries has gave a significant effects for our environment. For example: a lots number of waste tires from our vehicles, it’s a need a great budget to solved this waste tires and long period is need to perfectly corrupt this waste tires.
Taiwan is located at the subtropical zone and has rainy climate, for pavement engineering, OGAC (Open Grade Asphalt Concrete) can’t unable to satisfy the demand of service ability for pavement engineering target. Because of the climate factors, rainy bring a lots of water and this water will invade in to the pavement gradually, for the consequence our pavement will lose their functions.
For the result we should maintenance the pavement often in a short time,for the consequence we must increasing fees of maintenance this pavement. In order to reform function of OGAC pavement I would like to introduce Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement and to replace OGAC pavement with Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement is my majority target.
In this paper I would like to compare by the results of Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement in job site with the results of OGAC Pavement and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) that made by Marshall’s in Laboratory.
From the result of Modulus Resistant (MR) test that made in laboratory, we could see that Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement has a better performance than OGAC Pavement. And also from the result of Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) from laboratory, we could see that Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement has a better function to resist water that immerse into our pavement than OGAC Pavement.
By this paper, I would like to explain from the observation in long period I’ve made making “service ability” analysis from this Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement. And also use cost analysis making comparison between Asphalt-Rubber Hot mix Concrete Pavement with OGAC Pavement and also Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
1.American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard SpecificationD6114-97, “Standard Specification for Asphalt-Rubber Binder,” AnnualBook of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.03, 2002.
2.Johnson,R., Sproule, J., and Juristovski, A. (1995)” The Full scale Evaluation of Rubberized asphalt Concrete in British Columbia,” Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Charlottetown B PEI.
3.Lougheed, T. J., and Papagiannakis, A. T. (1996) “Viscosity Characteristics of Rubber-Modified Asphalts,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 153-156.
4.姜勇傑,橡膠瀝青鋪面的工程操作與應用考量,鋪面工程新材料新工法技術研討會,民國95月6月2日。
5.Jack L. Van Kirk, “An Overview of Caltrans Experience with Rubberized Asphalt Concrete,” Prepared for Review for 71st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 1992
6.Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, “The User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Material in Pavement Construction,” Federal Highway Administration, Scrap Tires – Asphalt Concrete (Wet process)
7.Hicks, R. G., Lundy, J. R., Leahy, R. B., Hanson, D. ,and Epps, J.(1995) “Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) in Asphalt Pavement :Summary of Practices in Arizona, California, and Florida,” Report FHWA-SA-95-056. FHWA.
8.劉雲亞,「新規格瀝青混凝土試鋪成效評估 —以公路總局第一區養護工程處為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國94月6月。
9.陳志恒、黃碧祥、蔡憲坤、童永茵,「橡膠瀝青示範道路推廣計畫」財團法人一般廢棄物回收清除處理基金會,八十五年專案委託研究計畫,財團法人工業技術研究院能源與資源研究所執行,中華民國86年6月。
10.林志棟,「瀝青混凝土配合設計與其原理」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國87年6月。
11.瀝青混凝土舖面,公共工程施工綱要規範,行政院公共工程委員會http://www.pcc.gov.tw/,民國95年6月
12.王睿懋,「不同高分子改質瀝青(PMB)之物理及化學性質初步探討」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國90年6月
13.蔡攀鰲,「瀝青混凝土」, 三民書局,民國74年。
14.蔡攀鰲,「瀝青混凝土材料試驗與配合設計」,三民書局,民國73年。
15.F.L.Rober,P.S.Kandhal,E.R.Brown,Dah-Yinn Lee,and T.W.Kennedy,” Hot Mix Asphalt Materials,Mixture Design,and Construction,”NAPA Education Fundation,(1991)
16.于惇德,林志棟,彭恩德,宋鴻禧,「台灣區常用瀝青膠泥物性分析」,台灣區常用瀝青混凝土研討會,中央大學土木工程研究所,第1-42頁,民國76年。
17.彭恩德,「瀝青混凝土力學特性之研究」,碩士論文,中央大學,第20-31頁,民國76年。
18.葉榮晟,林志棟,「瀝青材料分類規範之初步探討」,1992年瀝青混凝土路面材料特性研討會,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,第8-1至8-23頁,民國81年
19.張春貴,「廢輪胎橡膠瀝青路面試鋪作業與成效評估」,中華大學碩士論文,民國90 年7 月。
20.張運鴻,「以廢輪胎橡膠瀝青鋪築開放級配摩擦層之實務路究」,中華大學碩士論文,民國91 年6 月。
21.邱垂德、呂理成,「以廢輪胎橡膠瀝青拌製石膠泥瀝青混凝土之研究」,中華民國第五屆鋪面材料再生學術研討會論文集,民國91年10月。
22.American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard SpecificationD6114-97, “Standard Specification for Asphalt-Rubber Binder,” AnnualBook of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.03, 2002.
23.趙振平、邱德超,廢輪胎橡膠添加對瀝青混凝土回彈模數與變形之影響,第十一屆鋪面工程學術研討會,義守大學,高雄縣,民國90年8月23-24 日,pp.159-1666.邱垂德、張春桂、潘昌林,「公路局廢棄輪胎橡膠瀝青試鋪路面研究」,台灣公路工程,第28 卷,第1 期,民國90 年7 月
24.陳世晃,「改質瀝青混凝土規範之研擬」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國86年8月。
25.王韻謹,「再生瀝青混凝土路面施工成效之驗證」,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國86 年6 月。
26.蘇育民,「瀝青膠漿性質對於排水性瀝青混凝土成效之影響」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,民國91 年6 月。
27.林志棟,「瀝青混凝土車轍輪跡試驗成效研究」,期末報告,國立中央大學土木研究所,民國91 年。
28.ASTM E303-93 (Reapproved 1998),”Standaed Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol.04.03, UAS(1999) |