| 摘要(英) |
Recently, due to the rapid development of information technology, new financial products have been increasing introduced. It urged a new financial business which combined banking, stocks and bonds, insurance and investment. The liberalization, globalization, large-scale, and diversification of banking has been a trend. Since the financial industry in Taiwan opened up the establishment of new banks in 1991, the competition among the numerous financial institutes has become intensive. the non-performing loan ratio is increasingly getting high and the profits are getting low. Banks are faced with a great impact. In view of the situation, the government urged the merge of the banks and the establishment of financial holding companies to enhance the competitive strength of the banks.
This research applied Panel Data method with samples of 35 local banks in Taiwan to do the empirical investigation. To figure out the elements which affects the profitability performance of the banks, it utilized and analyzed each bank’s finance, service year material from 1993 to 2005.
The conclusions of this research are as follows. First, for the sample of all the banks, the capital adequacy ratio, the total assets turnover, non-interest income ratio and earning spread ratio are positively and significantly associated with the return on assets, while the non-performing loan ratio and the operating expenses ratio are negatively and significantly related to the return on assets. The sample of all banks and independent banks are mostly the same on real diagnosis result; the only difference is that the ratio of deposits to loans of the sample of independent banks is negatively and significantly related to the return on assets. However, for the sample of independent banks, the capital adequacy ratio does not have anything to do with return on assets. Secondly, for the sample of all the banks and independent banks, non-interest income ratio and earning spread ratio are positively and significantly related to the net income to operating revenue, while operating expenses ratio is negatively and significantly related to the net income to operating revenue. Besides, for the sample of independent banks, ratio of deposits to loans is positively and significantly associated with net income to operating revenue. Third, for the sample of financial holding company subsidiary banks, the scale of assets is positively and significantly related to return on assets and net income to operating revenue, while ratio liabilities to net equity and operating expenses ratio are negatively and significantly related to return on assets and net income to operating revenue.
This research can provide the financial officials of the government and the executives of the banks with the information to make a financial policy and supervise the financial institutes. It can also provide the information to the investors and the depositors while they are choosing and evaluating a bank. |
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1.沈中華 (2002)，金控公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較：1997－1998，台灣金融財務季刊，3(2)，73-94。
2.李憶雯 (2004)，「信用卡業務與銀行經營績效關聯性之研究」，中原大學企業管理系碩士論文。
3.林佳靜 (2001)，「台灣地區銀行業經營績效評估與比較」，實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
4.林炯垚、陳宗文 (1997)，銀行開放設立後產業結構與績效關係之研究─混合時間數列與橫斷面分析法，企業管理學報，40，49-70。
5.吳建良 (2004)，「資本適足率與逾期放款率對銀行財務績效之影響」，世新大學經濟學系碩士論文。
6.林隆偉 (2003)，「商業銀行關係放款、資產品質與經營效率之實證分析」，國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
7.林璧娟 (2001)，「銀行資本適足性與經營績效之探討」，銘傳大學金融研究所碩士論文。
8.柯亮宇 (2003)，「金融六法實施後臺灣銀行業分析─市場結構，定價行為及營運績效」，佛光人文社會學院經濟學研究所碩士論文。
9.陳瑞煬 (2001)，「台灣本國銀行業經營績效之分析─兼論購併之影響」，東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文。
10.陳錦村 (2004)，銀行管理概要，臺北市：新陸書局股份有限公司。
11.黃台心 (2005)，計量經濟學，臺北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。
12.曾令寧、黃仁德 (2004)，風險基準資本指南─新巴塞爾資本協定，臺北市：臺灣金融研訓院。
13.曾昭玲、陳世能、林俊宏 (2005)，逾放比對銀行經營績效影響之多期性研究，台灣金融財務季刊，6(4)，41-68。
14.劉雪聆 (2004)，「金融控股公司子銀行與獨立銀行之經營績效探討」，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.蔡美芳 (2005)，「我國銀行業經營績效評估之研究」，國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
16.蔡靜宜 (2002)，商業銀行合併信用合作社之績效改善分析，產業管理學報，3(1)，21-38。
二、英文部分
1. Akhigbe, Aigbe, and James McNulty (2005), “Profit efficiency sources and differences among small and large U.S. commercial banks,” Journal of Economics and Business, 29, 289-300.
2. Bonin, John P, Iftekhar Hasan, and Paul Wachtel (2005), “Bank performance, efficiency and owership in transtion countries,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 31-53.
3. Cebenoyan, A. Sinan and Philip E. Strahan. (2004), “Risk management, capital structure and lending at banks,” Journal of Banking ＆ Finance, 28, 19-43.
4. Diaz, Belen Diaz, Myriam Garcia Olalla, and Sergio Sanfilippo Azofra (2004), “Bank acquisitions and performance : Evidence from a panel of European credit entities,” Journal of Economics and Business, 56, 377-404.
5. Kwan, Simon H. (2004), “Risk and return of publicly held versus privately owned banks,” Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 10, 97-107.
6. Lifschutz, Shilo (2002), “The effect of SFAS 115 on earnings management in the banking industry,” Journal of Applied Business Research, 18, 1-11.
7. Sharma, Meena (2005), “Problem of NPAs and its impact on strategic banking variables,” Finance India, 19, 953-967.
8. Wetmore, Jill L. (2004), “Panel data, liquidity risk, and increasing loans-to-core deposits ratio of large commercial bank holding companies(1992-2000),” American Business Review, 22, 99-107. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit