| 摘要(英) |
The literature found (Dennis C. Mueller and Burkhard Raunig (1999)) standard "structure - conduct - performance" model when the industry as the homogeneity "structure - conduct - performance" model framework of a very good explanation, when the industry is heterogeneity "structure - conduct - performance" model framework analysis will be misleading.
In this study, according to cluster analysis methods, firms will be divided into different performance of the group, follow the "structure - conduct - performance" model using the balanced panel data of 2002-06 year our country information electron industry, discusses the market structure, the firm conduct and the market performance relatedness. Empirical found:(1) Export degree reduces the PCM profit, the reason lies in our country adepts is OEM foundry, and trade-oriented industrial structure, the foundry products are not to its own brand of international marketing, thus unable to differentiate products, thus creating excess profits. (2) The greater share of the market makers, representatives of firms with high efficiency, thus the greater of concentration of industry, will enable firms higher profit margins. (3) Firms with high debt ratio, will try to avoid the pursuit of high rewards PCM due to further raise prices lost market share. (4) Productivity indicators (net benefits for each employee), empirical analysis of the group are all firms showed statistical significant. The reaction of the economies of scale, particularly for high-performance group of firms owned by the technology, high-density R&D activities and management skills, capital- intensive firms reflects the higher productivity benefits. (5) Industry sales growth rate of increase is conducive to firms to increase their revenue, thus increasing profit margins. (6) Impact of fluctuations in the economy, business expansion or contraction period, the firms of different groups have different behaviour. (7) The real exchange rate and PCM present the negative relations, trade-oriented firms due to real exchange rate led to the competitiveness of firms lower than the cost of imports due to the appreciation of the real exchange rate, led to lower degree of PCM is more important. |
| 參考文獻 |
中文部份
1. 丁萬飛，「我國上市公司盈力時間序列研究:國際借鑒與方法探析」，大陸，財經理論與實踐, 第28卷, 第146期，2007年
2. 王正芬著，台彎資訊電子產業版圖，財訊出版社，台北市，民國 89年
3. 李灝銘，「以聚類分析解析北我國酸沉降特性之初步研究」，國立中央大學環境工程研究所碩士論文，民國85年
4. 周添城、林志誠著，我國中小企業的發展機制，聯經出版事業，台北市，民國88年
5. 林子菁，「台彎資訊電子產業出口競爭力之實證分析」， 國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文，民國91年
6. 柯文心，「市場結構、技術合作聯盟與經營績效之關聯性—資訊電子產業之實證」，國立台北大學經濟學系碩士班碩士論文，民國89年
7. 陳正倉等編著，產業經濟學， 雙葉書廊，台北市，民國93年。
8. 陳靖沅，「北高兩地氣流軌跡與降水化學之研究: 聚類分析之應用」，國立中央大學大氣物理研究所碩士論文，民國87年
9. 張維安編，我國的企業組織結構與競爭力，聯經出版事業，台北市，民國90年
10. 楊瑞龍、劉剛，「企業理論的發展對產業組織理論演進的影響」，大陸，東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版)，2001年
11. 劉國棟著，電子產業,懂這些就夠了!，大是文化，台北市，民國95年。
12. 鍾佩珊，「台彎資訊電子產業技術學習之途徑」，私立東海大學社會學系碩士論文，民國93年
13. 韓海波、張忠傑，「上市公司分類方法新探」，大陸，全國貿易經濟類核心期刊，2006年
英文部分
1. Ali Çulha Cihan Yalçin (2005),“The Determinants of the Price-Cost Margins of the Manufacturing Firms in Turkey”, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Working Paper No:05/15,
2. Brain S. Everitt, Sabine Landau, & Morven Leese, Cluster Analysis, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2001.
3. B. Burcin Yurtoglu (2004),“Persistence of Firm-level Profitability in Turkey”, Applied Economics, 36, 615–625,
4. Craig A. Gallet (1996) , “Mergers and Market Power in the US Steel Industry”, Applied Economics Letters, 3, 221-223,
5. Dennis C. Mueller and Burkhard Raunig (1999),“Heterogeneities Within Industries and Structure-Performance Models”, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, http://www.oenb.co.at/workpaper/pubwork.htm,
6. Frank M. Bass, Philippe Cattin, and Dick R. Wittink (1978),“Firm Effects and Industry Effects in the Analysis of Market Structure and Profitability”, Journal of Marketing Research,
7. Geoffrey F. Waring,“Industry Differences in the Persistence of Firm-specify Returns”, The American Economic Review; 86, 5; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 1253, Dec 1996,
8. Janes Ted Mcdonald,“The Determinants of Firm Profitability in Australian Manufacturing”, The Economic Record, Vol. 75, No. 229, 115-26, June 1999.
9. Kenneth J. Hatten and Dan E. Schendel (1977),“Heterogeneity Within an Industry:Firm Conduct in the US Brewing Industry”, Journal of Industrial Economics,
10. Robert D. Buzzell, Bradley T. Gale, and Ralph G.M. Sultan (1975),“Market Share - a Key to Profitability”, Harvard Business Review,
11. Schmalensee, R. (1985),“Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance”, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, 951-1009. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Shepherd, William, (1972),“The Elements of Market Structure”, The Review of Economics and Statistics”, Vol. 54, No.1, pp. 25-37. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit