認知風格對模擬為基礎之電腦輔助學習的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：90

、訪客IP：3.17.187.35

姓名

鄭芳媚(Fang-Mei Cheng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

認知風格對模擬為基礎之電腦輔助學習的影響
(The Effects of Students’ Cognitive Style upon Their Simulation-based Computer Assisted Learning)

相關論文

★ 在亞卓市教案編輯系統中設計學校本位教案發展之模組	★ 以同儕互評與討論提升小六學童之寫作表現 ~以行動學習輔具教室為例
★ 以言談分析方法解析鷹架輔助之線上即時互動	★ 『教學決策參照架構』對教師應用無線科技進行數學教學成效影響之實驗研究
★ 高中生「相關」迷思概念診斷工具之發展歷程研究	★ 以模擬為基礎的統計學習軟體之初探性評估研究
★ 線上同儕互評對國小六年級學童寫作學習成效影響之實驗研究	★ 模擬輔助理解系統對高中生統計「相關」概念學習成效之實驗研究
★ 認知風格對學習者於互動多媒體輔助統計學習之影響－以圖像型與文字型為例	★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments
★ 使用電腦字典輔助英文閱讀之認知負荷、認知歷程與非刻意字彙習得	★ 行動學習環境中「表徵形式」與「線索有無」對學習者學習行為、認知負荷與學習成效之影響
★ 認知負荷理論的應用與省思：優化電腦模擬輔助學習之介面設計與認知支持的系列研究	★ 虛擬教室結合頭戴式顯示器之注意力偵測設計及準確度分析與研究
★ 電腦模擬輔助學習中「人機互動」對認知負荷、學習歷程與學習成效的影響	★ 影響中小學教師行動科技融入教學之因素模式探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究之研究目的為：(1) 探討不同認知風格的學習者使用模擬系統的學習成效；(2) 瞭解不同認知風格的學習者使用模擬系統的操作行為；(3) 探討不同認知風格的學習者使用模擬系統的學習歷程；(4) 瞭解不同認知風格的學習者使用模擬系統的滿意度。
根據上述研究目的，採用配額抽樣方式選取某大學學生為研究對象。根據認知風格量表結果挑選直覺型與分析型受試者共19人。透過二階段迷思概念診斷測驗前測、後測及延後測結果和放聲思考取得的資料，分析兩組在學習成效、操作行為和學習歷程的差異。並輔以問卷調查法瞭解不同認知風格的學習者使用模擬系統的滿意度為何。
研究結果有四：(1) 分析不同認知風格受試者使用模擬系統之學習成效和行為操作，結果顯示沒有顯著的差異；(2) 探討不同認知風格受試者使用模擬系統之學習歷程，結果顯示在歸納原則和解決問題方式上受到認知風格的影響，直覺型與分析型受試者有差異存在。在不同認知風格受試者認知行為次數雷同上受到模擬系統的影響，在模擬系統「教學指引」和「回饋」功能的輔助下增加直覺型受試者分析、比較、歸納和反思的認知行為；(3) 分析不同認知風格受試者模擬系統使用滿意度，結果顯示直覺型受試者之滿意度顯著高於分析型；(4) 歸納研究結果發現模擬系統能提供學習者更有效率的學習統計「相關」概念。

摘要(英)

The purposes of the present study is to investigate the learning effects of the computer simulation systems among students with different cognitive styles; explore the differences in the usage behaviors of computer simulation system among students with different cognitive styles; study the learning processes of using the computer simulation systems by students with different cognitive styles; and examine the satisfaction among students with different cognitive styles about the use of computer simulation system.Undergraduate students from a certain university were recruited by quota sampling. According to results from the Cognitive Style Index, nineteen participants with intuition or analysis cognitive style were recruited. Pre-test, post-test, and follow-up test results were diagnosed with two-tier misconception. With data collected in the think aloud method, differences of learning effects, usage behaviors and learning processes between groups were analyzed. Satisfaction about the use of computer simulation system was obtained with questionnaires. Research results of the present study are as follows: First, there was no significant difference between participants with different cognitive styles in the learning effects and usage behaviors. Second, results showed significant differences in the principle of induction and problem solving methods between instinctive and analytic participants in their learning processes. Provided with the instruction and feedback function in the computer simulation system, analytic, comparative, inductive and reflective cognitive behaviors were increased for instinctive participants. Third, results indicated instinctive participants were significantly more satisfied with using the computer simulation system than analytic participants. Furthermore, inductive study showed the simulation system was more effective in teaching the “correlation” concept in statistics.

關鍵字(中)

★ 認知風格
★ 電腦模擬
★ 學習歷程
★ 放聲思考

關鍵字(英)

★ think aloud method
★ learning processes
★ computer simulation
★ cognitive style

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第三節研究問題 3
第四節名詞釋義 4
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節認知風格 7
第二節電腦模擬 14
第三節概念改變 17
第三章研究方法與設計 21
第一節研究對象 21
第二節研究設計 23
第三節研究流程 25
第四節研究工具 30
第五節資料整理與分析 35
第四章研究結果 39
第一節不同認知風格受試者的學習成效結果分析 39
第二節不同認知風格受試者的操作行為結果分析 49
第三節不同認知風格受試者的學習歷程結果分析 54
第四節不同認知風格受試者的滿意度結果分析 60
第五章研究討論 67
第一節從學習歷程探討認知風格對受試者使用模擬系統的影響 67
第二節從學習歷程探討模擬系統支援受試者提升學習成效的可能性 74
第六章結論與建議 81
第一節結論 81
第二節建議 84
參考文獻 87
附件一認知風格量表 93
附件二「模擬輔助統計理解系統」使用滿意度調查表 97

參考文獻

林清山（譯）（2001）。教育心理學：認知取向（原作者：Richard E. Mayer）。台北市：遠流。（原著出版年：1987）
劉子鍵和林怡均（2006年10月）。以二階段迷思概念診斷測驗探究高中生之「相關」迷思概念。劉佩雲（主持人），與學習有關之情感與態度。台灣心理學會第45屆年會，台北市東吳大學。
魏立欣（譯）（2004）。教育科技融入教學Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. (3rd ed.)(原作者：M. D. Roblyer)。台北市：高等教育。(原著出版年：2003)
羅綸新 (1994)。影響電腦軟體使用者滿意度之因素探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 82-0301-H-130-008），未出版。
Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., & Chaparro, B. S. (2005). Using the end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a web site. Decision Sciences, 36 (2), 341-364.
Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33 (1), 119-135.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (abridged ed.). Toronto, Canada: Addison Wesley Longman.
Armstrong, S. J. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20 (3), 323-339.
Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C., & Messer, D. (2002). The use of a co-operative student model of learner characteristics to configure a multimedia application. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 12 (2-3), 207-241.
Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 419-444.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (1), 3-15.
Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles, theory and constructs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED235185)
Effken, J. A., & Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Computers in Nursing, 19 (4), 164-171.
Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2001). The role of individual differences in Internet searching: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1049-1066.
Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 407-418.
H. Palmer, D. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87 (5), 663-684.
Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British Journal of Management, 5, 53-71.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Clarke, I. (2007). Exploring the cognitive significance of organizational strategizing: A dual-process framework and research agenda. Human Relations, 60 (1), 243-255.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., Noh, T., & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students' cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (9), 1037-1058.
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., & Depickere, A. (2005). What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system? Computers & Education, 45 (1), 1-19.
Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13 (2), 177-189.
Liegle, J. O., & Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (5), 885-898.
Linard, M. (1994). From learner’s styles to learner’s activity: Lessons from various learner-centered research. IFIP Transactions A-computer Science and Technology, 46, 57-79.
Liu, T. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2005, June). Applying the concept mapping method to explore high school students’ understanding and misconceptions about the “correlation”. Paper presented at the meeting of 2005 International Conference on Learning, Teaching and Assessment, Taiwan, Taipei.
Liu, T. C., Chen, Y. C., Hsiao, C. L., & Lin, Y. C. (2006, June). Exploring the effects of simulation based learning on college students’ statistical understanding, misconception, and attitude. Paper presented at the meeting of the 10th Annual Global Conference on Computers in Education, Beijing, China.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promises in educational research. Educational Psycologist, 19, 59–74.
Morris, E. J., Joiner, R., & Scanlon, E. (2002). The contribution of computer-based activities to understanding statistics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 (2), 114-124.
Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101.
Papanikolaou, K. A., Mabbott, A., Bull, S., & Grigoriadou, M. (2006). Designing learner-controlled educational interactions based on learning/cognitive style and learner behaviour. Interacting with Computers, 18 (3), 356-384.
Riding, R., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1 (3), 199-208.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive style and learning strategies. London, David Fulton.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1999a). Intuition-analysis cognitive style and learning preferences of business and management students: A UK exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14 (1), 26-38.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1999b). Intuition-analysis style and approaches to studying. Educational Studies, 25 (2), 159-173.
Someren, M. W. V., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London, Academic Press.
Stemberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). A capsule history of theory and research
on styles. In R. J. Steinberg & Li-fang Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles (pp.1-21). London, NJ: Erlbaum.
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., Demetriadis, S., & Georgiadou, E. (2004). The value of adaptivity based on cognitive style: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35 (1), 95-106.

指導教授

劉子鍵(Tzu-Chien Liu)

審核日期

2007-7-9

推文