國小學童圖文閱讀的理解策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：86

、訪客IP：18.226.82.122

姓名

張菀真(Wan-chen Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

國小學童圖文閱讀的理解策略
(Investigating the strategies used by children during reading illustrated science texts)

相關論文

★ 以眼動型態探討背景知識對詞彙辨識的影響	★ 合作寫作對於國小學童科學概念學習之影響
★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例	★ 幼童敘說書面故事之後設認知表現
★ 新移民家庭子女口語敘說能力之發展	★ 圖文提示對學童閱讀科學說明文記憶與理解之影響
★ 識字教學法與口語詞彙能力對新移民女性中文識字學習之影響	★ 先備知識對於不同閱讀能力的學童在閱讀歷程中自我提問的影響
★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments	★ 教師示範與文本提示對國小學童自我解釋與閱讀理解表現之影響
★ 國小學童之工作記憶能力對於閱讀理解監控表現的影響	★ 成人與幼童的言談行為分析：比較電子書與紙本書親子共讀的情境
★ 探討幼兒的早期書寫表現及其影響因素	★ 探究教師閱讀教學自我效能與閱讀自我調整教學信念及實踐之關係
★ 探討閱讀能力與文本架構對於國小學童使用理解策略的影響	★ L2詞素結構註解與L1字義註解於線上閱讀環境中對EFL字彙學習影響之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究目的是探討閱讀能力高低不同的國小學童在閱讀附有插圖的科學文章時，其所產生的閱讀理解策略，以深究閱讀能力不同的讀者在圖文閱讀中閱讀理解的情形。本研究採用放聲思考的方式，從學童的口述資料直接了解學童如何運用閱讀理解策略，並且能注意到插圖中的細節等，進而在圖文之間整併訊息而得以理解文章內容。研究結果顯示無論高或低能力學生均會利用與先備知識相關的策略進行理解，例如聯想延伸。當進行放聲思考的內容分析時，則發現高能力學生的解釋會緊扣文章主題或該段落的概念，所以較不偏離文章大意；而低能力學生卻會受限於段落的文字，延伸該字詞的意涵，因此對於該篇文章的理解就會產生偏移。在插圖閱讀的部份：高能力的學生在閱讀插圖時，不僅會注意到插圖內部的細節，同時也會閱讀搭配插圖的相關文字；而低能力的學生，較無法對應文字及相關的插圖內容，所以顯得較廣泛性地閱讀插圖，少注意到插圖內部的細節，且會因插圖色調的顯著性而著重看某區域。組織性插圖有時間性的特色，因此學生閱讀時會按照其順序閱讀，並且多著重於第一張插圖的細節；詮釋性插圖的訊息量較多，所以學生看圖的次數會較組織性插圖多，並且多以文章中的科學概念作為閱讀插圖的指引。

摘要(英)

The objectives of the study were to investigate the reading strategies of elementary school students when they read science text with illustrations and to explore the process of how learners integrate information from text and illustration and how the characteristics of learners influence the process of learning from science text. The participants were 32 sixth grade students and they were grouped into high- and low- ability subgroups, based on their performance on a reading comprehension test. In order to explore the strategies adopted by students, they were asked to “think aloud” when they read two illustrated science texts. The reading materials included two expository science texts, one with an organizational illustration, and the other with an interpretational illustration. The results indicated that both groups of students frequently activated prior knowledge to assist their comprehension of the text contents. Students in the high ability group often had prior knowledge related to the main concepts, while students in the low ability group were more inclined to focus on their previously unrelated knowledge or experience of some particular words, which might obstruct their understanding of the contents. When analyzing students’ reading behaviors, the results showed that students in the high-ability group were more likely to inspect the illustrations carefully to attend to the detailed features and they also spent more time reading the corresponding text. Students in the low-ability group tended to divide their attention depending on the colors and layouts of the adjunct illustrations. Because the organizational illustrations were presented with particular sequences, they were processed according the flow of the accompanying text material. When presented with the interpretational illustration, the results showed that students were more inclined to direct their attention based on the text relatedness of the illustration.

關鍵字(中)

★ 放聲思考
★ 插圖
★ 閱讀理解策略
★ 科學文章

關鍵字(英)

★ think aloud
★ reading strategy
★ illustration
★ science text

論文目次

目錄 i
圖次 iii
表次 iv
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究問題 3
第三節名詞解釋 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節閱讀理解策略 5
第二節圖文理解的理論 8
第三節插圖的分類與功能 11
第四節圖文理解的實徵研究 20
第三章研究方法與設計 27
第一節研究方法 27
第二節研究對象 28
第三節研究工具 30
第四節研究流程與研究程序 31
第五節資料分析 35
第四章結果分析與討論 37
第一節閱讀策略分析 37
第二節插圖運用分析 47
第五章結論與建議 57
第一節結論 57
第二節建議 59
參考書目 61
附錄一指導語 67
附錄二科學文章 68

參考文獻

江淑卿 (1999)。圖解理解策略在學習輔導的運用—談如何提高中小學學生的理解力。學生輔導，(62)，8-19。
吳訓生 (2001)。國小低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研究。特殊教育學報，15，177-215。
吳訓生 (2002)。國小高、低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略之比較研究。特殊教育學報，16，65-104。
宋曜廷 (2000)。先前知識、文章結構和多媒體呈現對文章學習的影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文，台北市，未出版。
汪榮才（1995）。國小學生之後設認知與科學文章閱讀理解。國民教育研究集刊，(1)，81-139。
李美滿（2001）。探討高二學生對生物課本圖片詮釋之相關因素。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，台北市，未出版。
林燕玉（2006）。國小低年級國語教科書插圖之研究─以翰林版為例。國立臺中教育大學語文教育學系碩士論文，台中市，未出版。
林麗娟 (1996)。多媒體電腦圖像設計與視覺記憶的關係。教學科技與媒體，6(28)，3-12。
邱月玲（2002）。不同的科學圖文配置對學生閱讀學習的影響－以「月相概念」為例。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文，台中市，未出版。
柯華葳（1999）。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，46(2)，1-11。
涂金堂（1999）。國小學生數學解題歷程之分析研究。初等教育學刊，7，295-332。
張厚粲、劉寶霞、舒華 (1996)。插圖在說明文閱讀理解中的作用。心理學報，28(2)，154-159。
許良榮 (1994)。科學課文的特性與學習。科學教育，170，23-36。
陳黎枚（2002）。國小自然科學教科書圖解設計類型之研究。雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系碩士論文，雲林縣，未出版。
單文經 (1996)。插圖的種類與設計原則。教學科技與媒體，6(28)，30-37。
黃雅彬（2004）。學生對國中自然科教科書不同知識表徵理解之研究。國立臺灣師範大學生命科學研究所碩士論文，台北市，未出版。
楊芷芳（民83）。國小不同後設認知能力兒童的閱讀理解能力與閱讀理解策略之研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文，台中市，未出版。
謝添裕 (2002)。國小學童對不同形式以及不同圖文配置之科學文章其閱讀理解與閱讀觀點之研究。國立台中師範學院自然科學教育學系碩士論文，台中市，未出版。
謝琇玲 (1996)。插圖對學生閱讀學習的影響研究。高雄工學院學，3，305-315。
藍嘉淑 (2000)。圖片在國中生物科教學的角色及其對學生圖片理解之影響。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，高雄市，未出版。
Barry, A. L. (2002). Reading strategies teachers say they use. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(2), 132-141.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2003). Promoting higher-order learning benefits by building lower-order mnemonic connections. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 563-575.
Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 62-88.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 129-151.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163-182.
Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39(2 & 3), 125-128.
Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. J. (1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(5), 477-483.
Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177-190.
Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 383-399.
Levie, W. H. (1987). Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. The Psychology of Illustration, 1, 1-50.
Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 195-232.
Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 615-629.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. London: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension, 14, 333–356.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.291-309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3-32.
Reid, D. (1990a). The role of pictures in learning biology: Part 1, perception and observation. Journal of Biology Education, 24(3), 161-172.
Reid, D. (1990b). The role of pictures in learning biology: Part 2, picture-text processing. Journal of Biological Education, 24(4), 251-258.
Rummel, N., Levin, J. R., & Woodward, M. A. (2003). Do pictorial mnemonic text-learning aids give students something worth writing about? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 327-334.
Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., & Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), 227-238.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Braten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 107-117.
Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1982). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 185-224). NY: Longman.
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 344-355.
Schnotz, W., Bannert, M., & Seufert, T. (2002). Towards an integrative view of text and picture comprehension: Visualization effects on the construction of mental models. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension, 16, 385-416.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2) , 141-156.
Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101-119.
Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader's think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 549-568.
van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
van Oostendorp, H., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Introduction: Naturalistic texts and tasks. In Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 1-8). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261-312.

指導教授

辜玉旻(Yu-min Ku)

審核日期

2007-7-15

推文