沉箱式碼頭受震反應的數值分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：69

、訪客IP：18.191.116.19

姓名

馬志睿(Zh-Ruan Ma ) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程研究所

論文名稱

沉箱式碼頭受震反應的數值分析

相關論文

★ 砂土層中隧道開挖引致之地盤沉陷與破壞機制及對既存基樁之影響	★ 以離心模型試驗探討逆斷層作用下單樁與土壤互制反應
★ 攝影測量在離心模擬試驗之應用-以離心隧道模型之地表沉陷量量測為例	★ 軟土隧道襯砌應力與地盤變位之數值分析
★ 沉箱碼頭受震反應及側向位移分析	★ 潛盾隧道開挖面穩定與周圍土壓力之離心模擬
★ 地理資訊系統應用於員林地區液化災損及復舊調查之研究	★ 黏性土層中隧道開挖引致之地盤沉陷及破壞機制
★ 砂土層中通隧引致之地盤變位及其對既存基樁的影響	★ 既存隧道周圍土壓力受鄰近新挖隧道的影響
★ 以攝影測量觀察離心土壩模型受滲流力作用之變位	★ 通隧引致鄰近基樁之荷重傳遞行為
★ 潛盾施工引致之地盤沉陷案例分析	★ 以離心模型試驗探討高含水量黏性背填土加勁擋土牆之穩定性
★ 懸臂式擋土壁開挖之離心模型試驗	★ 既存隧道襯砌彎矩受鄰近水平新挖隧道的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文除了介紹台中港碼頭的破壞案例，將災害調查數據與日本地震災害案例作比較之外，並希望藉由能夠由數值分析軟體FLAC模擬台中港現場災害的破壞模式。並在模擬的過程中探討以FLAC進行動態分析的各項步驟以及相關的影響因素，確立以FLAC進行動態分析的可行性，並提供未來學者欲以FLAC進行動態分析研究的參考。
本研究的成果，在案例研究方面，建立了台中港與神戶港案例模式的比較，從施工方式與現地尺寸、地震規模和地質鑽探記錄去探討兩個不同時空下地震災害的關連性，以提供未來工程設計的參考。另一個最主要目的，更是了解FLAC程式動態分析法的特性與步驟，引進多種分析方法，建立起現地孔隙水壓分布與地表變形模式，並針對膨脹角(Dilation Angle)於沉箱運動行為與孔隙水壓激發特性進行參數分析。
從參數分析的結果發現，具有膨脹角的土壤對於沉箱位移量的發展與孔隙水壓的激發都有明顯抑制的作用；而利用土壤的殘餘強度進行動態分析，對於後線地表變形的模擬是一種較為實用的模擬技巧。從現地孔隙水壓的模擬結果，可以幫助我們對於當地震作用時，沉箱基礎鄰近區域的孔隙水壓上升的分布情況，有更深一層的了解。另外，藉由作用於牆體動態土壓力的觀測，探討利用數值分析軟體(FLAC)之計算結果與傳統理論(M-O法)計算結果之間的準確性。

摘要(英)

It has been investigated and evaluated that destructive pattern in Taichung Harbor and the Port and Rokko Island occurred during 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake and 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. Destruction phenomenon can be divided into two parts: Lateral displacement, settlement, and inclination induced by the lost of bearing capacity in foundation soil below the caisson; another way, not only serious ground failure but also structure damages will be caused by lateral spreading and settlement of saturated cohesionless soil liquefaction behind the quay wall resulting from strong earthquake.
In this thesis, observed lateral displacement and settlement of the ground surface resulting from liquefaction in Taichung Harbor are described and evaluated in terms of the values estimated based on existing methodology. Finally, the outcome of an in-situ survey and the comparison between Taichung Harbor and Kobe Port on permanent deformations behind the quay wall are presented.
The numerical tool employed in the present study is FLAC, a two-dimensional explicit finite difference code for modeling soil, rock and structural behavior. The result conducted by static earth pressure analysis concluded that a lateral extension of as much as six times the wall height is required to eliminate the effect of the boundary condition for infinitely extended backfills. In addition, a perfect result compared with classical Coulomb earth pressure analysis theory is shown.
By dynamic analysis of caisson quay wall with FLAC, two goals are achieved. One is to understand how to conduct the dynamic analysis in FLAC when pore pressure generation and ground deformation is considered. Another is to verify the ability of FLAC to predict hazard in field model. For the numerical model, comparison between measured and computed model response were made. The result shows that ground deformation simulation is well done by using residual strength method in dynamic analysis. In addition, the displacement of quay wall and the pore pressure generation is greatly induced when dilation angle is increasingly applied in the backfill or foundation soil.

關鍵字(中)

★ 側向位移
★ 動態分析
★ 數值模擬
★ 沉箱基礎
★ 液化

關鍵字(英)

★ FLAC
★ lateral displacement
★ liquefaction

論文目次

第一章緒論…………………………………………………………… 1
1-1 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………… 1
1-2 研究方法…………………………………………………………… 3
1-3 論文內容…………………………………………………………… 4
第二章文獻回顧與案例分析…………………………..……… 6
2-1 受災機制探討……………………………………………………… 6
2-1-1 土壤液化的類型…….………………………………………… 6
2-1-2 牆體變位與地表變形……….………………………………… 7
2-1-3 沉箱的運動行為與孔隙水壓的激發.………………………… 9
2-1-4 現場災害案例分析………………….…………………..…… 11
2-2 案例研究方法…………………………………………..………… 12
2-3 案例研究結果與比較…………………………………..………… 15
2-3-1 台中港與神戶港側向滑動的比較……….…………..……… 15
2-3-2 台中港與神戶港施工方式的比較.…………………..……… 17
2-3-3 台中港與神戶港地震記錄的比較.…………………..……… 18
2-3-4 台中港與神戶港鑽探記錄的比較.…………………..……… 19
2-3-5 台中港與神戶港地震對港灣工程所造成破壞分析的綜合比較..19
2-3-6 現場照片記錄………………………..………………..……… 20
第三章 FLAC簡介與土壓力分析…………...……………… 40
3-1 FLAC程式簡介…………………………………………………… 40
3-2 基本靜態土壓力分析………………………..…………………… 42
3-2-1 邊界距離的決定……………………………………………… 42
3-2-2 界面的建構…………………………………………………… 43
3-2-3 界面元素的模擬……………………………………………… 44
3-3 分析方法與討論………………..………………………………… 46
3-3-1 界面性質的估算……………………………………………… 46
3-3-2 分析結果與討論……………………………………………… 46
第四章 FLAC動態分析…………...…………………………… 58
4-1 FLAC動態分析理論……………………………………………… 58
4-1-1 基本介紹……………….……………...……………………… 58
4-1-2 邊界條件與外部荷重………………………………………… 58
4-1-3 機械阻尼與波傳效應………………………………………… 61
4-2 動態分析模式的建立………………………………..…………… 63
4-2-1 FLAC進行動態分析的步驟………..………………………… 63
4-2-2 台中港分析模式的建立………..……………..……………… 72
第五章模擬結果與參數分析…………...………………………. 85
5-1 參數研究………………………………………………………….. 85
5-1-1 膨脹角……………….……………...………………………… 85
5-1-2 不同膨脹角對位移量的影響……………….……………...… 86
5-1-3 膨脹角對孔隙水壓激發的影響……………….……………... 86
5-2 台中港受災模式之模擬………………………………………….. 89
5-2-1 沉箱破壞型式的模擬……………….…………….………….. 90
5-2-2 地表變形的模擬……………….…………….……………….. 90
5-2-3 現地孔隙水壓的分布……………….………….…………….. 91
5-2-4 動態土壓力的分析………………….………….…………….. 92
第六章結論與建議…………...………………………………….. 111
6-1 結論……………………………………………………………… 111
6-2 建議……………………………………………………………… 112
參考文獻…………...………………………………………………… 114

參考文獻

1.Inagaki, H., Iai, S., Sugano, T., Yamazaki, H., and Inatomi, T., “Performance of caisson type quay wall at Kobe Port,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotech. Aspects January, pp.119-136 (1996)。
2.簡連貴、賴聖耀、林敏清，“ 921集集大地震對台中港區港灣設施災損調查與評估 ”，土木水利，第二十六卷，第三期，82-95頁(1999)。
3.Hamada, M., and Wakamatsu, K., “Liquefaction-induced ground displacement triggered by quaywall movement,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotech. Aspects September, pp.85-95 (1998)
4.Ghalandarzadeh, A., Orita, T., Towhata, I., and Yun, F., “Shaking table test on seismic deformation of Gravity quay walls,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotech Aspects September, pp.115-132 (1998)
5.Lai, S., Ichii, K., Liu, H., and Morita, T., “Effective stress analysis of port structures,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotech Aspect September, pp.97-114 (1998)
6.Seed, H.B. and Whitman, R. V., “Design of earth retaining structures for dynamic loads,” Proceedings, ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures, pp. 103-147 (1970)
7.李崇正、吳秉儒、熊大綱，”以離心模型的震動台試驗探討沉箱碼頭的側向擴展 ”，地工技術 (2000)
8.李崇正、陳慧慈，“集集大震中港穀類碼頭側移及沉陷初勘”，港灣報導季刊，No. 50，1-10頁 (1999)
9.蘇吉立、李延恭，“ 921集集大地震後台中港北碼頭災象調查分析 ”，地工技術，第七十七期，65-76頁 (2000)
10.Ishihara, K., Yasuda, S., and Nagase, H., “Soil Characteristic and Ground Damage.” Soils and Foundations, Special Issues on Geotech Aspect January, pp.109-118.（1996）
11.Ishihara, K., Yoshida, K. and Kato, M., “Ground deformation characteristics caused by lateral spreading during the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,”
12.Lysmer, J., and Kuhlemeyer, R. L., “Finite dynamic model for infinite media,” J. Eng. Mech., 95(EM4), pp. 85-105 (1969)
13.Cundall, P. A., “Explicit finite difference methods in geomechanics,” in Numerical Methods in Engineering (Proceedings of the EF Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics (Blacksburg, Virginia, June 1976), Vol. 1, pp. 132-150 (1976)
14.Lysmer, J., T. Udaka, C. F. Tsai and Seed, H. B., “FLUSH-A computer program for approximate 3-D analysis of soil-structure interaction problem,” University of California, Berkley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. EERC 75-30 (1975)
15.Biggs, J. M., Introduction to Structural Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill. (1964)
16.Kuhlemeyer, R. L., J. Lysmer. “Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problem,” J. Soil Mech. & Foundations Div., ASCE, 99(SM5), 421-427 (May) (1973)
17.Martin, G.R., Finn, W.D.L., and Seed, H. B., “Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT5, pp.423-438. (1975)
18.Iwasaki, T., and Tatsuoka, F., “Effecs of grain size and grading on dynamic shear moduli of sands,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 19-35 (1977)
19.台中港務局，“九二一地震台中港北碼頭區一至四A碼頭地質鑽探調查成果報告書”，四川土木大地技師事務所 (1999)
20.Boresi, A.P., Schmidt, R.J., and Sidebottom, O.M., Advanced mechanics of materials, 5th ed. New York: Wiley (1993)
21.FLAC, User’s Manual, Version 3.3, ITASCA Consulting Group, Inc., U.S.A. (1995)
22.Matsuo, O., Shimazu, T., Uzuoka, R., Mihara, M., and Nishi, K., “Numerical analysis of seismic behavior of embankments founded on liquefaction soils,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, April, Vol.40, No. 2, pp.21-39. (2000)
23.Mageau, D., & Stauffer, S., “Lateral spread earth pressures in drilled shafts,” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, ASCE, pp. 1344-1355
24.Kramer, S. L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, London, pp.423-496 (1996)
25.Balakrishnan, A., and Kutter, B. L., “Settlement, sliding, and liquefaction remediation of layered soil,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering, pp. 968-978 Nov. (1999)
26.Kohama, E., Miura, K., Yoshida, N., Ohtsuka, N., and Kurita, S., “Instability of gravity type quay wall induced by liquefaction of backfill during earthquake,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 71-83, Dec. (1998)
27.Newmark, N. M.,“Effect of earthquakes on dams and embankments,”Geotechnique, Vol. 115, No.2, pp. 139-159 (1965)
28.黃俊鴻、楊志文、譚志豪，「集集地震土壤液化之調查與分析」，地工技術，第七十七期，51-64頁 (2000)。
29.張金機、賴聖耀、謝明志，「台中港1至4A碼頭921地震液化災損初步調查研究」，交通部運輸研究所港灣技術研究中心 (1999)。
30.台中港務局，「九二一地震台中港北碼頭區港埠設施災損原因研究分析報告書」，宇泰工程顧問有限公司 (1999)。

指導教授

李崇正(Chung-Jung Lee)

審核日期

2001-7-11

推文