以WRF模式搭配Spectral Nudging進行區域氣候模擬之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：49

、訪客IP：3.138.118.215

姓名

呂柏儀(Bo-yi Lu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣物理研究所

論文名稱

以WRF模式搭配Spectral Nudging進行區域氣候模擬之探討
(Using the WRF model with Spectral Nudging for Regional Climate simulation)

相關論文

★ 宜蘭地區秋冬季降雨特性之研究	★ 台灣地區午後對流降水特性之分析
★ 台灣梅雨季中尺度對流系統之數值模擬研究-TAMEX IOP 8 個案	★ 利用整合探空系統分析南海北部大氣邊界層特性之研究
★ 中尺度波譜模式對梅雨期豪雨個案模擬之研究	★ 宜蘭地區秋冬季豪大雨特性之研究
★ 台灣東南部地區局部環流與邊界層特性之研究	★ 台灣東南部地區複雜地形局部環流的模擬研究
★ 宜蘭地區豪雨個案之研究	★ 台灣北部地區雨滴粒徑分佈特性與降雨估計之探討
★ 冬季雹暴個案之分析與模擬	★ 伴隨敏督利颱風的強烈西南氣流引發豪大雨之個案探討
★ 利用整合探空系統分析台灣東南部地區大氣邊界層特性之研究	★ 桃芝颱風(2001)數值模擬研究：颱風路徑與結構之模擬與分析
★ 利用雨滴譜儀分析不同降水系統之微物理特性研究	★ 台灣北部地區不同季節以及不同降水型態的雨滴粒徑分布特性

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

全球氣候模式(GCMs)對於局地的區域性天氣特徵受限於解析度不足而難以清楚呈現，但若是使用GCMs資料透過動力降尺度方式提供給區域模式，則較能解決GCMs無法解析區域和局地氣候變化的問題。然而區域模式由於長期積分下，區域模式的表現有著隨時間快速變差的情形，因此若是在區域模式中配合使用波譜納進法(Spectral Nudging)，則可能解決此問題。
本研究使用Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) 模式，針對2009年冬季進行三個月的模擬，將Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)解析度0.5°的資料進行動力降尺度，並分為三個部份進行討論。首先比較四種不同長時間積分方法對15公里解析度之長期模擬的表現。其次討論Spectral Nudging的敏感度測試。最後討論高解析度的5公里網域，不同的Spectral Nudging及側邊界資料來源區域氣候模擬的影響。
本論文的研究結果顯示，使用Spectral Nudging並加入水氣調整之積分方法不僅能維持大尺度流場，避免產生錯誤的高低壓，模擬的降雨分佈亦能顯著改善且較合理。而當Spectral Nudging納進波數越多時，大尺度流場較接近分析場，但小尺度特徵則遭壓抑，造成降雨量低估；使用Spectral Nudging進行區域氣候模擬，大尺度流場不會受到區域尺度擾動支影響，而有沒有考慮Spin-up對於降雨表現上並未有明顯差異。而高解析之內層網格之側邊界及Spectral Nudging的資料，若直接使用全球模式之再分析資料，不論降雨或其他變數的模擬表現都比較好，同時也可以較準確的模擬出溫度及氣壓的日夜變化。綜合而言，使用Spectral Nudging進行區域氣候模擬確能顯著減少區域尺度之擾動對大尺度流場的影響，而能模擬出較好之區域氣候特徵。

摘要(英)

General circulation models (GCMs) are unable to represent local subgrid-scale features because of their coarse resolution. Thus, the nested regional climate modeling technique, also refer to as dynamical downscaling, which GCMs are used to provide the initial (ICs) and lateral meterological and surface boundary condition (LBCs), are developed to produce the regional-scale features. However, the simulation of Regional Climate Models (RCMs) tends to drive away from the driving field and the skill will damp rapidly with time. Through the spectral nudging, the RCMs can alleviate the problems.
Here, we use the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model over East Asia to dynamically downscale the 0.5-degree Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR). We perform the three phase of experiments for the winter in 2009. In phase one, we compare the different downscaling skill with a grid spacing at 15km for climate, including the long- and short-term integration and long-term with spectral nudging; besides, we add the specific humidity in spectral nudging to improve the result of precipitation. In phase two, we discuss two sensitivity test of spectral nudging. In the last phase, we compare the dynamically downscaling between different information of LBCs and spectral nudging with a grid spacing at 5km for climate.
Compare to ERA interim, the downscaling simulation using the spectral nudging with additionally adding moisture not only can keep the large-scale pattern, but significantly improve the realistic result of precipitation in phase one. In phase two, though spectral nudging with more wavenumber can generate the more reasonable pattern, it constrains the feature at small scale and the precipitation will be underestimated because of immature system. Through the spectral nudging, the large-scale pattern can be handled, and the result of cold and warm start show the similar result. In the phase three, simulation with GCMs for information of LBCs and nudging produce the highest skill. The spectral nudging can generate realistic regional-scale climate information. In particular, spectral nudging which are configured to nudge moisture can revise the error to generate reasonable precipitation pattern that are not resolved by simply updating the LBCs as done traditionally.

關鍵字(中)

★ 納進法

關鍵字(英)

★ Nudging

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 ix
第一章緒論 1
1.1 前言與前人研究 1
1.2 研究動機 5
第二章研究工具與方法 7
2.1 研究使用資料 7
2.2 模式介紹 8
2.3 Spectral Nudging介紹 9
2.4 模式設定 11
2.5 驗證方法 15
2.5.1 溫度、質量場及風場驗證 15
2.5.2 降雨驗證 18
第三章結果與驗證 19
3.1 長期模擬測試 19
3.1.1 溫度、質量場及風場驗證 19
3.1.2 降雨驗證 26
3.2 Spectral Nudging敏感度測試 28
3.2.1 溫度、質量場及風場驗證 28
3.2.2 降雨驗證 32
3.3 高解析度網域側邊界及Spectral Nudging資料來源測試 34
3.3.1 溫度、質量場及風場驗證 34
3.3.2 降雨變數驗證 41
第四章結論 44
第五章參考文獻 48
附圖 52

參考文獻

Bowden, Jared H., Tanya L. Otte, Christopher G. Nolte, Martin J. Otte, 2011: Examining Interior Grid Nudging Techniques Using Two-Way Nesting in the WRF Model for Regional Climate Modeling. J. Climate, 25, 2805–2823.
Bukovsky,M. S., andD. J. Karoly, 2009: Precipitation simulations using WRF as a nested regional climate model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 2152–2159.
Castro, C. L., Pielke Sr., R. A., and Leoncini, G., 2005: Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J. Geophys. Res., 110, D05108, doi:10.1029/2004JD004721.
Cha, D.-H., D.-K. Lee, and Y.H. Kuo, 2006: An implementation of spectral nudging technique to the WRF model. 7th WRF Users’ Workshop, Boulder, CO, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 4 pp.
Charney, J., M. Halem, R. Jastrow, 1969: Use of Incomplete Historical Data to Infer the Present State of the Atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1160–1163.
Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land-surface/ hydrology model with the Penn State/ NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585.
Chen, F., Z. I. Janjic, and K. Mitchell, 1997: Impact of atmospheric surface-layer parameterizations in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP Mesoscale Eta model. Boundary Layer Meteorol., 85, 391–421.
Cheng, Fang-Yi, Yu-Ching Hsu, Pay-Liam Lin, Tang-Huang Lin, 2013: Investigation of the Effects of Different Land Use and Land Cover Patterns on Mesoscale Meteorological Simulations in the Taiwan Area. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol.,52, 570–587.
Davies, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 102, 405–418.
Dickinson, R. E., R. M. Errico, F. Giorgi, and G. T. Bates, 1989: A regional climate model for the western United States. Clim. Change, 15, 383– 422.
Gandin, L. S., 1963: The objective analysis of meteorological fields: Leningrad, Hydrometerological Publishing House. [English translation, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1965.]
Hong, S.-Y., J. Dudhia, and S.-H. Chen, 2004: A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120.
Hong, S.-Y., Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318–2341.
Leung, L. R., and Y. Qian, 2009: Atmospheric rivers induced heavy precipitation and flooding in the western U.S. simulated by the WRF regional climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L03820, doi:10.1029/2008GL036445.
Liu, P., A. P. Tsimpidi, Y. Hu, B. Stone, A. G. Russell, and A. Nenes, 2012: Differences between downscaling with spectral and grid nudging using WRF. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3601–3610.
Lo, J. C.-F., Z.-L. Yang, and R. A. Pielke Sr., 2008: Assessment of three dynamical climate downscaling methods using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09112, doi:10.1029/2007JD009216.
Miguez-Macho, G., G. L. Stenchikov, and A. Robock, 2004: Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D13104, oi:10.1029/2003JD004495.
Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiativetransfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16663-16682.
Rockel, B., Castro, C. L., Pielke Sr., R. A., von Storch, H., and Leoncini, G., 2008: Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21107, doi:10.1029/2007JD009461.
Stauffer, D. R., and N. L. Seaman, 1990: Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1250– 1277.
Stauffer, D. R., Seaman, N. L., and Binkowski, F. S., 1991: Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model: Part II: effects of data assimilation within the planetary boundary layer. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 734–754
Von Storch, H., H. Langenberg, and F. Feser, 2000: A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes. Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 3664–3673.
Waldron, K. M., Paegle, J., and Horel, J. D., 1996: Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options. Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 529–547.

Wang, Y., O. L. Sen, and B. Wang, 2003: A highly resolved regional climate model (IPRC_RegCM) and its simulation of the 1998 severe precipitation events over China. Part I: Model description and verification of simulation. J. Climate, 16, 1721–1738.
____, S.-P. Xie, H. Xu, and B. Wang, 2004: Regional model simulations of marine boundary layer clouds over the Southeast Pacific off South America. Part I: Control experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 274–296.
White, B. G., J. Paegle, W. J. Steenburgh, J. D. Horel, R. T. Swanson, L. K. Cook, D. J. Onton, and J. G. Miles, 1999: Short-term forecast validation of six models. Weather Forecast., 14, 84– 107.
Wigley, T. M. L., P. D. Jones, K. R. Briffa, and G. Smith, 1990: Obtaining sub-gridscale information from coarse-resolution general circulation model output. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 1943–1953.
Zhang, C.-X., Y. Wang, and K. Hamilton, 2011: Improved representation of boundary layer clouds over the Southeast Pacific in WRF-ARW using a modified Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3489–3513.
Zhang, Chunxi, Yuqing Wang, Axel Lauer, Kevin Hamilton, 2012: Configuration and Evaluation of the WRF Model for the Study of Hawaiian Regional Climate. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3259–3277.

指導教授

林沛練(Pay-liam, Lin)

審核日期

2014-7-28

推文