| 摘要(英) |
Due to the protection from Personal Data Protection Law, the information of radiation-contaminated house is not open to public, which causes the information is extremely complex in the market and makes people confused in buying houses. Nowadays, the total number of radiation-contaminated house in Taipei City and New Taipei City are still 1,033 left. Radiation-contaminated house not only affect the house price, but also damage people’s health. As a result, I use the samples of the house price from Taipei City and New Taipei City in my research and adopt the hedonic price model to investigate whether radiation-contaminated house will still cause negative effects to the house price in the neighborhood after twenty years, and if so the extent to which distance from the radioactive house in question affects housing price.
The information and preferences of house transactions in 2012 and 2013 in this research are from Real Estate Actual Transaction Price Database developed by the Ministry of the Interior. The result from the research shows that semi-logarithmic linear model from Taipei City adding the variable of gradient distance interval between MRT station has high explanatory capacity for housing prices. Instead, due to the incomplete MRT system in New Taipei City, variable of gradient distance interval between MRT station from New Taipei City decrease the explanatory capacity of the variable of gradient distance interval from radiation-contaminated house ability to explain . the results of the house hedonic variable completely correspond to the expectation of this research.
In order to distinct from previous researches, I used extra model which is quantile regression to investigate the effects of independent variables on dependent variables under different quantile of house price. The statistical results shows that the extent to which the radiation-contaminated house affect the low-quantile of house price is higher than the extent to which the radiation-contaminated house affect the intermediate-quantile and high-quantile house price.
|
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1、任立中、林佩瑩(2013)，《台北市傳統零售市場消費型態之分析-分量迴歸模型之應用》，《行銷科學學報》，9(1):77-108。
2、李慧珍(2007)，《輻射污染建築物健檢居民生活品質之研究》，國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
3、林祖嘉(2008)，《風水對不同住宅價格影響之研究：分量迴歸之應用》，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文
4、林家維(2013)，《探討輻射屋對於鄰近房價之影響-以台北市、新北市為例》，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
5、張冊蒼(2012)，《捷運通車對區域房價之影響-以蘆洲區為例》，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
6、曾菁敏(2008)，《空間外部性、交易成本與市地重劃對住宅土地價格影響之研究－台南市的實證分析》，《住宅學報》，17(1):23-50。
7、邱志宏(2002)，《工程小叢書-核子工程系列 輻射防護》，財團法人中興工程科技研究發展基金會。
8、彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻(2009)，《捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析-以營運階段為例》，《運輸計劃季刊》，第38卷，第三期，p275-p296。
9、黃得殷(2011)，《房價影響因子之研究-以新板橋車站特定專用區為例》，逢甲大學都市計畫與空間資訊學系碩士論文。
10、戴國正(2012)，《大眾捷運系統對房價影響效果之再檢視》，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文
二、英文部分
1、Brid Gleeson Hanna (2007), House values, incomes, and industrial pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54 : 100–112.
2、Cohen JP, Coughlin CC (2009), Changing noise levels and housing prices near the Atlanta airport, Growth and Change 40: 287–313.
3、Currie, J., M. Greenstone, and E. Moretti (2011), Superfund Cleanups and Infant Health, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 101(3): 435-441.
4、Debrezion G, Pels E, Rietveld P (2007) , The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: a meta-analysis. J Real Estate Fin Econ 35: 161–80.
5、Debrezion, G., Pels, E., et al. (2011), The Impact of Rail Transport on Real Estate Prices, Urban Studies 48(5): 997-1015.
6、Hanna, Brid Gleeson. (2007), House Values, Incomes, and Industrial Pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(1): 100-112.
7、Katherine A. Kiel, Jeffrey E. Zabel (2001), The economic benefits of cleaning Superfund sites, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22: 163–184.
8、Katherine A. Kiel, Michael Williams (2007), The impact of Superfund sites on local property values: are all sites the same? Journal of Urban Economics 61: 170–192.
9、Lucas W. Davis (2004), The effect of health risk on housing values: evidence from a cancer cluster, American Economic Review 94:1693–1704.
10、Lucas W. Davis (2011), The effect of power plants on local housing values and rents, Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (4): 1391–1402.
11、Michael Greenstone, Justin Gallagher (2008), Does hazardous waste matter? evidence from the housing market and the Superfund program, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 951–1003.
12、Rosen, S. (1974), Hedonic price and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82(1):34-55.
13、Shanti Gamper-Rabindran, Christopher Timmins (2011), Hazardous waste cleanup, neighborhood gentrification, and environmental justice: evidence from restricted access census block data, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 101(3): 620–624.
14、S. Gamper-Rabindran and Christopher Timmins (2013), Does cleanup of hazardous waste sites raise housing values? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 345–360.
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit