參考文獻 |
中文參考文獻
1.何嘉欣(2011),國中生未來時間觀、學習資源的社會支持與學習動機、學業成就之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士班未出版碩士論文。
2.邱英豪(2006)。國中學生未來時間觀照之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系未出版碩士論文。
3.林月琴(1999)。美國高齡員工的工作動機。國立空中大學社會科學系社會科學報,民88,7期,071-092頁。
4.林麗芳(2009)。高中職學生未來時間觀與課業學習動機調整策略關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系未出版碩士論文。
5.林麗惠(2006)。台灣高齡學習者成功老化之研究。人口學刊,33,133-170。
6.吳麗芬(1985),國民小學組織結構正式化、集中化與教師工作動機之關係,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所未出版碩士論文。吳麗芬(1986)
7.馬財專(2010)。臺灣中高齡勞工失業問題之檢視及政策思考。臺灣社會福利學刊,9(1),頁45-95。
8.許士軍(1985)。管理學,臺北:東華書局。
9.黃珮婷(2011)。大學生未來時間觀、知覺工具性及自我調整學習之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系未出版碩士論文。
10.張春興(1989)。心理學,臺北:東華書局。張春興(1989)
11.簡淑女(2011)。未來工作坊對國中生未來時間觀影響之研究─以宜蘭縣羅東國中為例。佛光大學未來學系未出版碩士論文。
12.藍采風、廖榮利(民83),組織行為學,臺北:三民書局。廖榮利與藍采風(1994)
13.郭乃文. (2012)。 工作動機, 工作投入, 及激勵因素對工作滿意度之影響-以中國上海市台商產業與台灣產業為例. 成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文, 1-67.
14.劉潔玲(2002)。從中國傳統文化思想及價值觀論目標取向理論在華人社會的應用。教育研究資訊,10(3),183-203。
15.蔡榮貴(2011)。我國高齡者活躍老化教育模式與策略。計畫編號:CN10013-CN10014; 計畫年度:100。
英文參考文獻
1.Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
2.Anderson, J. C., & Moore, L. F. (1974). Characteristics of Canadian volunteers in direct service. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 3(2), 51-60.
3.Anderson, J. C., & Moore, L. F. (1978). The motivation to volunteer. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 7(3), 120-129.
4.Angle, H. L. & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1):1-14.
5.Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2008). Organisational practices and the postretirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 36 –53. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00057.
6.Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensations. In: P.B. Baltes & M.M. Baltes (Eds.), successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
7.Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A., 2003. Academic Delay Of Gratification, Future Goals, and Self-Regulated Leanring. Paper Presented at The Annual Meeting Of The American Educational Research 18 Association, Chicago.
8.Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19:533-546.
9.Campell, J. P. and R. D. Pritchard. (1976), Motivation Theory in Individual and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally: Chicago.
10.Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale.Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
11.Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.
12.Doering, M., Rhodes, S. R., & Schuster, M. (1983). The aging worker, CA: Sage.
13.Gjesme, T. (1983), On the concept to future time orientation: Considerations of some functions and measurements’ implications. International Journal of psychology, 18(5), 443-461.
14.Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. Gerontologist, 1(1), 8-13.
15.Herbert, T. T. (1976). Dimensions of organizational behavior. Macmillan.
16.Holland, B. K. (1989). “Motivation and Job Satisfaction.” Journal of Property Management, 54(5) , pp.32-36.
17.Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (1972, 1982), Educational administration: theory, research, and practice, New York: Random House.
18.Husman, J., & Lens, W., 1999. The Role of The Future in Student Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113.
19.Husman, J., & Shell, D. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning & Individual Differences, 18(2), 166-175.
20.Jawahar, I. M. & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A Longitudinal investigation of task and contextual performance influences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24, 251-269.
21.Kanfer, R., Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Goals and motivation related to work in later adulthood: An organizing framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 253–264. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.734298
22.Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, D. E. (1990). Work motivation: Theory and practice. American Psychologist, 45(2), 144.
23.Kenyon, G. M. & Randall, W. L. (2001). Narrative gerontology: An overview. In G. M. Kenyon, P. clark, B. de Vries (Eds.). Narrative gerontology: Theory, research, and practice. NY: Springer (pp. 2-18).
24.Kooij, D., & Van De Voorde, K. (2011). How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 228–247.
25.Kooij, D. T., Bal, P. M., & Kanfer, R. (2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation.Psychology and aging, 29(2), 319.
26.Kooij, D., & Van De Voorde, K. (2014). Future Time Perspective and Promotion Focus as Determinants of Intraindividual Change in Work Motivation.
27.Lu, L. (2012). Attitudes towards aging and older people’s intentions to continue working: A Taiwanese study. Career Development International, 17, 83-98.
28.Lyness, K.S., Thompson, D.E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: do female and male executives follow the same root? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 86-101.
29.Mathews, B. P. & Shepherd, J. L. (2002). Dimensionality of Cook and Wall’s 1980 British organizational commitment scale revisited, Journal of Occupational Organizational Psychology, 75:369-375.
30.Miller, R., & Brickman, S., 2004. A Model of Future-Oriented Motivation and Self-Regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9-33.
31.Ouwehand, C., De Ridder, D. T. D., & Bensing, J. M. (2007). A review of successful aging models: Proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy. Clinical Psychology Review. 27(8): 873-884. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.003
32.Owens, R. G. (1990), Organizational Behavior in Education, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33.Pinder, C. C. (1984), Work Motivation: Theory, Issues, and Applications, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
34.Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 12(1), 35-55.
35.Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1976). Organization theory: a structural and Behavioral analysis, New York: Irwin.
36.Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theory of work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 154-168.
37.Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1):46-56.
38.Sparrow, P. R., 1986. Job performance among older workers. Aging International, 13, 5-6, 22.
39.Speen, G. B. (1998). “Maximizing Employee Performance Through Motivation. ” Incentive, pp.2-7
40.Vázquez, S., & Rapetti, M., 2006. Future Time Perspective and Motivational Categories in Argentinean Adolescents. Adolescence, 41, 511-532.
41.Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view, Academy of Management Review, 7(3):418-428.
|