博碩士論文 102423045 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:26 、訪客IP:3.15.221.10
姓名 古佳禾(Jia-He Gu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 購物網站品質與購買意圖之比較研究:以行動版本與APP版本為例
(A Comparative Study of Shopping Website Quality and Purchase Intention: Mobile Version versus APP Version)
相關論文
★ 以破壞性創新理論分析中國山寨產業--以手機產業為例★ 初探線上遊戲對未來領導力的影響
★ 研究機構之開放創新模式-以工研院為例★ 影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討
★ Wiki使用者與使用行為之研究★ 醫療院所科技化服務創新與組織能力關係之研究
★ 社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例★ 協同寫作工具對寫作成效的影響
★ 部落格之網路口碑評比機制平台管理與應用★ 虛擬貨幣交易平台之實現
★ 數位匯流創新經營模式研究 - 以台灣電信業者為例★ SNS遊戲影響社會網路服務持續使用之探討
★ 網路團體購物之使用者行為分析★ 探討微網誌使用者持續使用意圖之研究
★ 如何透過Facebook成員轉送線上內容來行銷?★ 臉書看世界,你!Travel了嗎
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 隨著智慧型手機的出現、3G與Wi-Fi網路的普及,以往使用者利用電腦瀏覽購物網站進行購物,漸漸改為使用智慧型手機上網購物,這種行動購物方式隱藏著無限的可能性,也帶來許多商機。本研究針對購物網站的系統品質、一般內容品質、特定內容品質、服務品質、外觀品質來探討這些因素是否會影響使用者經驗,進而影響使用者的購物意願,並且也對購物網站在行動裝置上的行動版與APP版進行研究,以進一步探討此兩種版本在各方面之品質是否有所差異。
  本研究分別對購物網站行動版與行動購物APP的使用族群進行網路問卷調查,發現購物網站行動版與行動購物APP,這兩者的各項品質對於使用者經驗與購買意圖皆有正向影響。在品質比較方面,系統品質與特定內容品質兩項購物網站行動版是優於行動購物APP。因此,商家可以透過良好的品質來提升使用者在瀏覽過程中的使用者經驗與購買意圖,而對於有意使用行動購物APP的商家,則需對系統品質與特定內容品質再作加強,以符合使用者的需求。
摘要(英) With the emergence of 3G and Wi-Fi network, smart phones become popular now. The users gradually change the use of computer to smart phones for browsing the sites for shopping. Consequently, mobile shopping is of infinite possibilities, and has many commercial opportunities. In this study, we investigate whether the factors, system quality, general content quality, specific content quality, service quality, and appearance quality presented in the shopping websites will affect the user experience and then affect the purchase intention. In addition, this thesis also compare the mobile and APP versions on mobile devices for shopping websites, i.e. comparing the differences of the quality factors between the two versions of websites.
In this thesis, online-survey questions are designed, and two groups of users are invited. One group uses mobile version and the other group uses APP version of shopping websites. According to the returned surveys, we find that every quality factor in both mobile version and APP version has positive impact of user experience and purchase intention. In the comparison between quality factors, it is found that mobile version of shopping websites is better than APP version at the two factors, system quality and specific content quality. Therefore, business shops can enhance the user experience and purchase intention through a websites of good quality factors mentioned above. In addition, the business shops developing shopping APP should enhance the factors, system quality and specific content quality, to meet the needs of the users.
關鍵字(中) ★ 行動購物APP
★ 購物網站行動版
★ 網站品質
★ 使用者經驗
★ 使用意圖
關鍵字(英) ★ mobile shopping
★ mobile website
★ shopping APP
★ website quality
★ user experience
★ purchase intention
論文目次 論文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
致謝辭 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 行動商務 4
第二節 網站品質 5
第三節 使用者經驗 9
第四節 購買意圖 11
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 研究架構 12
第二節 研究假說 13
第三節 變數的衡量與定義 16
第四節 研究設計 23
第四章 資料分析 24
第一節 樣本敘述性統計 24
第二節 信效度分析 29
第三節 結構方程模型分析 33
第四節 研究假說檢定 36
第五章 結論 47
第一節 研究發現與結論 47
第二節 研究貢獻 54
第三節 研究限制 56
第四節 未來發展與建議 57
第六章 參考文獻 58
附錄一 購物網站行動版問卷 62
附錄二 行動購物APP問卷 68
參考文獻 英文文獻部分
[1] Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2005). The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3(4), 405-420.
[2] Aladwani, A. M. (2006). An empirical test of the link between web site quality and forward enterprise integration with web consumers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), 178-190
[3] Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information & Management, 39(6), 467-476.
[4] Alben, L. (1996). Defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions, 3(3), 11-15.
[5] Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Guinalíu, M. (2012). Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 124-132.
[6] Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision support systems, 37(2), 187-197.
[7] Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, , 351-370.
[8] Bridges, E., & Florsheim, R. (2008). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience. Journal of Business Research, 61(4), 309-314.
[9] Clarke III, I. (2001). Emerging value propositions for m-commerce. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(2), 133.
[10] Cohen, J. B., & Areni, C. S. (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. Handbook of consumer behavior, 4(7), 188-240.
[11] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
[12] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
[13] Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS quarterly, 259-274.
[14] Engel, J. F., R.D. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard (1984), Consumer Behavior, 6th edition, Hwa-Tai Bookstore.
[15] Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43(1), 1-14.
[16] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
[17] Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.
[18] Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d′Interaction Homme-Machine, 11-15.
[19] Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010). Needs, affect, and interactive products–Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 353-362.
[20] Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97.
[21] Hausman, A. V., & Siekpe, J. S. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5-13.
[22] Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 19(3), 223-240.
[23] Huizingh, E. K. (2000). The content and design of web sites: An empirical study. Information & Management, 37(3), 123-134.
[24] Kim, E. B., & Eom, S. B. (2002). Designing effective cyber store user interface. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5), 241-251.
[25] Law, E. L., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P., & Kort, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 719-728.
[26] Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-33.
[27] Lu, H. P., & Yu-Jen Su, P. (2009). Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research, 19(4), 442-458.
[28] Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which "intenders" actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
[29] Newman, M. W., & Landay, J. A. (2000, August). Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 263-274). ACM.
[30] Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering Elsevier.
[31] Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability: Preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66-75.
[32] Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing science, 19(1), 22-42.
[33] Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, , 418-430.
[34] Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420.
[35] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. the Journal of Marketing, 41-50.
[36] Park, J., Han, S. H., Kim, H. K., Cho, Y., & Park, W. (2013). Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: Survey, interview, and observation approaches. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(4), 279-293.
[37] Reynolds, F. D., & Wells, W. D. (1977). New york:McGraw-hill. Consumer Behavior (2nd Ed),
[38] Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145.
[39] Shneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
[40] Song, J., & Zahedi, F. (2001). Web design in e-commerce: a theory and empirical analysis. ICIS 2001 Proceedings, 24
[41] Van der Heijden, H., & Verhagen, T. (2002). Measuring and assessing online store image: A study of two online bookshops in the benelux. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2639-2646.
[42] Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/Consumption-based affective responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 258-270.
中文文獻部分
[43] Consumer Barometer. (2014). Google洞察報告. Retrieved 3/29, 2015, from https://www.consumerbarometer.com/en/insights/?countryCode=TW
[44] Hot3c. (2014). Google 發表台灣線上購物與多螢研究報告. Retrieved 5/20, 2015, from http://www.hot3c.com/read.asp?class=13&id=22221
[45] INSIDE. (2014). Yahoo!奇摩調查:網購族逾半使用行動購物,手機點燃 O2O 新商機. Retrieved 3/29, 2015, from http://www.inside.com.tw/2014/09/16/yahoo-mobile-shopping#fnref:1
[46] iThome. (2014). Google調查:台灣用戶愛用手機網購,行動購買力世界第一!. Retrieved 3/29, 2015, from http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/91955
[47] Millward Brown. (2014). 台灣人滑手機世界第一,每日平均使用197分鐘. Retrieved 3/29, 2015, from http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/33403
[48] 資策會FIND. (2014). 智慧型行動裝置普及率近7成 市場即將飽和! 資策會find:行動族群半年增加逾100萬人、全臺滑世代破1,432萬. Retrieved 3/27, 2015, from http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=8303
指導教授 粟四維(Wesley Shu) 審核日期 2015-7-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明