探討學習風格、線上討論行為與學習成效之關係─「組織行為」翻轉教室之實徵研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：29

、訪客IP：18.116.14.71

姓名

張允柔(ZHANG YUN-ROU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

探討學習風格、線上討論行為與學習成效之關係─「組織行為」翻轉教室之實徵研究

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，國內不少教師開始嘗試翻轉教室教學法，期望能提升學生的學習成效與課程滿意度。然而，成功的翻轉教室教學並非一蹴可幾，教師通常需要經過一段時間的試驗，方能設計出適合該領域、該年級學生的翻轉教室教學方式。本研究針對大學部組織行為課程實施翻轉教室教學實驗，並以修課學生102人為研究對象，探討學生的學習風格、線上討論行為、學習成效與課程滿意度之間的關係。
本研究為場地實驗研究，指定學生在LMS討論區上進行課前討論，以觀察學生的發文行為與非發文行為，並使用Kolb學習風格為研究工具，探討學生的學習風格與線上討論行為之間的關係，以及分析學生的線上討論行為對學習成效與課程滿意度的影響。本研究經過資料分析後，所得的結果如下：
1. 學生的學習風格未顯著影響線上討論之發文行為與非發文行為。
2. 學生的線上討論之發文行為與非發文行為皆會部份影響學習成效。
3. 學生的線上討論之發文行為會部份影響課程滿意度，而非發文行為未顯著影響課程滿意度。
根據以上研究結果，本研究建議往後的翻轉教室教學仍可使用線上討論區作為學生的課前學習輔助工具，因為線上討論對學生的學習成效確實有所助益，而主動參與線上討論之行為也能促進學生的課程滿意度。本研究再根據質化調查結果，發現過多的預習負荷量會導致學生將線上討論區視為分工預習的媒介，而缺乏實質上的互動討論。故本研究也建議，未來教師在設計翻轉教室教學時，須給予學生適當的預習任務與明確的討論問題，使學生有餘裕進行思考並產生更佳的線上討論效果。

摘要(英)

Nowadays, many teachers in Taiwan are engaged in flipped classroom implementation. All of they expect that flipped classroom could positively influence student’s learning achievement and course satisfaction. However, there are different appropriate way of implementing flipped classroom for different kinds of courses. Therefore, teachers should conduct teaching experiment to find out the suitable design of flipped classroom for their students.
In this study, an “Organization Behavior” course in the National Central University was selected to pilot a flipped classroom approach. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to explore the relationship between students’ learning style and their online participation in a flipped classroom course, and second, to investigate the relationships of students’ online participation with their learning achievement and with course satisfaction. A total of 102 undergraduate students from this course took part in the study. There were several major findings in this study, including:
1. Students’ learning style didn’t influence online participation.
2. Student’s posting behavior and non-posting behavior of online discussion partially influence their learning achievement.
3. Student’s posting behavior of online discussion partially influence their course satisfaction, while their non-posting behavior of online discussion didn’t influence their course satisfaction.
This study highlights that teachers could let student use forum as assistant tool for preview, cause students’ online discussion predict their learning achievement and course satisfaction. In addition, teacher should not give too much preview work which lead to students’ non-interactive behavior in forum. To promote students’ motivation of discussing online with others, teachers should give moderate preview work and provide specific discussion questions for students.

關鍵字(中)

★ 翻轉教室
★ 課程滿意度
★ 學習成效
★ 線上討論
★ 學習風格

關鍵字(英)

★ flipped classroom
★ course satisfaction
★ learning achievement
★ online discussion
★ learning style

論文目次

目錄
一、緒論 1
1.1　研究背景與動機 1
1.2　研究目的 2
1.3　論文架構 3
二、文獻探討 4
2.1　翻轉教室教學法 4
2.2　學習風格 6
2.3　線上討論行為 9
2.4　學習成效 10
2.5　學習風格與線上討論行為之關係 10
2.6　線上討論行為與學習成效、課程滿意度之關係 11
三、研究方法 14
3.1　研究模型與假說 14
3.2　實驗方法 14
3.3　實驗流程 15
3.4　研究工具 19
3.4.1　Kolb學習風格量表 19
3.4.2　LMS討論區 20
3.4.3　紙筆測驗 21
3.4.4　課程滿意度問卷 21
四、資料分析與討論 23
4.1　問卷之信度、效度分析 23
4.1.1　Kolb學習風格問卷 23
4.1.2　課程滿意度問卷 24
4.2　描述性統計分析 26
4.2.1　學習風格 26
4.2.2　線上討論行為 28
4.2.3　學習成效與課程滿意度 29
4.3　研究假說檢定 31
4.4　質化調查結果 36
4.5　研究結果討論 38
4.5.1　不同學習風格對線上討論行為（發文行為、非發文行為）之影響 38
4.5.2　線上討論行為（發文行為、非發文行為）對學習成效之影響 38
4.5.3　線上討論行為（發文行為、非發文行為）對課程滿意度之影響 39
4.5.4　研究結果小結 40
五、研究結論與建議 41
5.1　研究結論 41
5.2　研究貢獻與實務意涵 42
5.3　研究限制與未來研究方向之建議 43
5.3.1　研究限制 43
5.3.2　未來研究方向之建議 43
六、參考文獻 45
附錄一　Kolb學習風格問卷 50
附錄二　課程滿意度問卷 52

參考文獻

英文文獻
Akkoyunlu, B., & Yılmaz-Soylu, M. (2008). Development of a scale on learners′ views on blended learning and its implementation process. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 26-32.
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS quarterly, 159-174.
Alvarez, B. (2012). Flipping the Classroom: Homework in Class, Lessons at Home. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77(8), 18-21.
Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study.
Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking?: Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147-155.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., & Larkin, K. C. (1989). Self-efficacy as a moderator of scholastic aptitude-academic performance relationships. Journal of vocational behavior, 35(1), 64-75.
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2014). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Course design: planning a flipped class. (2013). from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/planning-courses-and-assignments/course-design/course-design-planning-flipped-class
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28.
Dennen, V. P. (2008a). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624-1633.
Dennen, V. P. (2008b). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 205-219.
Dringus, L. P., & Terrell, S. (1999). The framework for DIRECTED online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(1), 55-67.
Du, X., & Taylor, S. Flipped classroom in first year management accounting unit–a case study.
Federico, P.-A. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 359-379.
Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77(1).
Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63-71.
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
Gregorc, A. F., & Ward, H. B. (1977). Implications for learning and teaching: a new definition for individual. NASSP Bulletin, 61(406), 20–26.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Hair, J. F., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Huang, E. Y., Lin, S. W., & Huang, T. K. (2012). What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 338-349.
Kayes, D. C. (2005). Internal validity and reliability of Kolb’s learning style inventory version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 249-257.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: an overview. In NASSP’S student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of
Secondary School Principles.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning style: Theory and practice. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-version 3.1 (2005 technical specifications). HayGroup: Experience Based Learning Systems, Inc.
Koschmann, T., Hall, R. P., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation: Routledge.
Lee. (2001). Profiling students′ adaptation styles in Web-based learning. Computers & Education, 36(2), 121-132.
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163.
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 401-426.
Schullery, N. M., Reck, R. F., & Schullery, S. E. (2011). Toward solving the high enrollment, low engagement dilemma: A case study in introductory business. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(2), 1-9.
Shaw, R.-S. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58(1), 111-120.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. New York, NY: Wiley.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Terrell, S. R. (2002). The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in a Web-based learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 345-352.
Tseng, C. R., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers and
Education, 51(2), 776–786.
Tucker, B. (2012, March 21, 2013). the Flipped Classroom., from http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/
Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in education, 38(2), 213-230.
Wang, K. H., Wang, T., Wang, W.-L., & Huang, S. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207-217.
Wierstra, R., & De Jong, J. (2002). A scaling theoretical evaluation of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory-2. Learning styles: reliability and validity, 431-440.
Woolf, B. P. (2010, 4 June 2013). A roadmap for education technology. from http://www.coe.uga.edu/itt/files/2010/12/educ-tech-roadmap-nsf.pdf
Xie, K. (2013). What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students’ behaviour in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 288-301.
Xie, K., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67-89.
中文文獻
周新富. (2009). 教育研究法: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
葉丙成. (2015). BTS 翻轉教室-3.馴化篇. from http://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/blog-detail?id=482
藍家祺、李誠. (2004). E 訓練課程設計與學習動機對訓練成效之影響－以 I 公司
為例。. 第十屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會.
陳靖彤. (2007). 以學習理論探討網路教學介面設計與學習滿意關係之研究. 中原
大學商業設計研究所學位論文, 1-151.
鄭孟芳. (2005). 國小高年級學習風格、學習動機與學業成就相關研究. 國立彰化師範大
學生物學系碩士論文.

指導教授

周惠文

審核日期

2015-8-11

推文