博碩士論文 104427024 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:98 、訪客IP:3.142.255.252
姓名 張容瑄(Jung-Hsuan Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 矛盾追隨行為前因及後果探討
(Paradoxical Followership Behaviors : Antecedents and Consequences)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來管理研究領域逐漸重視對追隨者議題的探討,隨著環境朝向全球化、動態性、競爭性的發展,矛盾的需求逐漸增加,當追隨者同時面對來自工作領域中對立的需求時,即會展現出看似矛盾但卻互相關聯的追隨行為,既能發會最大效益幫助組織成長,又能避免因表現過為突出而使主管受到威脅。然而過去並無深入探討部屬矛盾追隨行為產生的因素以及其所影響之後果,本研究以主管的矛盾領導行為及部屬的整合式思維做為前因;以部屬的薪資成長率、晉升次數、職涯滿意度、主管對部屬之晉升力評分等職涯成功衡量項目做為後果,進一步探討矛盾追隨行為的前因與後果。
本研究蒐集台灣企業之樣本,共回收308份有效主管部屬配對問卷。研究結果顯示:(1)主管的矛盾領導行為對部屬的矛盾追隨行為有正向顯著的影響;(2)矛盾追隨行為對部屬的晉升次數有正向顯著影響;(3)矛盾追隨行為對部屬的晉升力評分有正向顯著的影響;(4)矛盾追隨行為對部屬的職涯滿意度有正向顯著的影響。
摘要(英)
Followership research has gained more attention nowadays in management field. As environment become increasingly global, dynamic, and competitive, contradictory demands intensify. Followers will use paradoxical behaviors which are seemingly competing, yet interrelated, to meet competing workplace demands simultaneously. Not only help organizations grow, but also avoid threatening supervisors. However, very few studies discuss the antecedents and consequences of paradoxical followership behaviors before. In this study, using paradoxical leadership behaviors(PLB) and holistic thinking as antecedents; growth of salary, promotions, promotability, and career satisfaction which are used to measure career success as consequences.
This study examined the antecedents and consequences of paradoxical followership behaviors with 308 samples from companies of Taiwan. The result showed that (1) paradoxical leadership behaviors has positive effect on paradoxical followership behaviors; (2) paradoxical followership behaviors has positive effect on promotions; (3) paradoxical followership behaviors has positive effect on promotability; (4) paradoxical followership behaviors has positive effect on career satisfaction.
關鍵字(中) ★ 追隨力
★ 矛盾追隨行為
★ 矛盾領導行為
★ 整合式思維
★ 職涯成功
★ 薪資成長率
★ 晉升次數
★ 職涯滿意度
★ 晉升力評分
關鍵字(英) ★ Followership
★ aradoxical Followership Behavior
★ Paradoxical Leadership Behavior
★ Holistic Thinking
★ Career Success
★ Growth of salary
★ Promotion
★ career satisfaction
★ promotability
論文目次
中文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i
Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ii
誌謝 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii
目錄 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iv
圖目錄 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v
表目錄 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vi
第一章 緒論 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 -------------------------------------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究目的 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
第二章 文獻探討 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
第一節 矛盾追隨行為 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 5
第二節 影響矛盾追隨行為的因素 -------------------------------------------------- 7
第三節 矛盾追隨行為對員工職涯成功的影響 ---------------------------------- 10
第三章 研究方法 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13
第一節 研究架構 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 13
第二節 研究樣本與程序 ------------------------------------------------------------- 14
第三節 研究變項衡量 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 16
第四節 資料分析與統計方法 ------------------------------------------------------- 21
第四章 研究結果 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22
第一節 資料來源與樣本特性 ------------------------------------------------------- 22
第二節 信度與效度分析 ------------------------------------------------------------- 23
第三節 相關分析 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 28
第四節 假設模型檢驗 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 30
第五章 結論與討論 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32
第一節 研究結果與討論 ------------------------------------------------------------- 32
第二節 學術貢獻 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 34
第三節 實務貢獻 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 36
第四節 管理意涵 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 37
第五節 研究限制與未來建議 ------------------------------------------------------- 38
參考文獻 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40
參考文獻 英文文獻
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130 -139.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (2001). Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Job Search and Separation Among Employed Managers. Personnel psychology, 54, 25–50.
Bray, D. W., & Howard, A. (1980). Career success and life satisfactions of middle-aged managers (L. A. Bond & J. C. Rosen Eds.). NH: University Press of New England.
Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543–562.
Chaleff, I. (2009). The Courageous Follower. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence of Demographic Composition and Organizational Culture on Work Processes and Outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 749-780.
Chen, M. J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the Competition–Cooperation Relationship:A Transparadox Perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 288-304.
Chen, X.-P., Xie, X.-f., & Chang, S. (2011). Cooperative and Competitive Orientation among Chinese People: Scale Development and Validation. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 353-379.
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. ( 2007). Individual Differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking. Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 691-705.
Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism. Theory Culture Society, 22, 255-267.
Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction : theory and criticism after structuralism. London: Routledge.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6, 524–540.
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627-647.
Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15(1), 19-25.
Ford, D. K., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Rejected But Still There: Shifting the focus in applicant reactions to the promotional. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 402-416.
Gattiker, U. E., & Larwood, L. (1989). Career success, mobility and extrinsic satisfaction of corporate managers. Social Science Journal, 26, 75-92.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing. Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
Greenhaus, J., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. (1990). Organizational experiences and career success of black and white managers. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S. & Wormley, W.M. . (1990). Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Gutteridge, T. G. (1973). Predicting Career Success of Graduate Business School Alumni. The Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 129-137.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). An Examination of Temporal Variables and Relationship Quality on Promotability Ratings. Group Organization Management, 31, 677-699.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hollander, E. P. (1993). Legitimacy, power and influence: A perspective on relational features of leadership. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jawahar, I. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A Longitudinal Investigation of Task and Contextual Performance Influences on Promotability Judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251-269.
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. J. (1995). An Empirical Investigation of the Predictors of Executive Career Success. Personnel psychology, 48, 485-519.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits,general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52, 621-651.
Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Van Dick, R. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower–advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1205-1222.
Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kelley, R. E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review, 142-148.
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and Interaction Effect of Task and Contextual Performance on Supervisory Reward Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602-609.
Kong, M., Qian, X., Peng, K., & Liu, J. (2015). Mr. Right & Superman: Effect of Implicit Followership Theories on Employee′s Career Success. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
Koo, M., & Choi, I. (2005). Becoming a Holistic Thinker:Training Effect of Oriental Medicine on Reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1264-1272.
Korman, A. K., Wittig-Berman, U., & Lang, D. (1981). Career success and personal failure: Alienation in professionals and managers. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 342-360.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1990). The credibility factor: What followers expect from their leaders. Management Review, 79(1), 29-34.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 572-587.
Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2004). Leadership processes and follower identity. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Lounsbury, J. W., Loveland, J. M., Sundstrom, E. D., Gibson, L. W., Drost, A. W., & Hamrick, F. L. (2003). An investigation of personality traits in relation to career satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(3), 287-307.
Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When Fit Is Fundamental: Performance Evaluations and Promotions of Upper-Level Female and Male Managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777-785.
Magnusson, D., & Torestad, B. (1993). A Holistic View of Personality: A Model Revisited. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 427-452.
Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A Work Values Approach to Corporate Culture: A Field Test of the Value Congruence Process and Its Relationship to Individual Outcomes. Journal or Applied Psychology, 74(3), 424-432.
Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 58, 367-408.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
Norris, C. (1991). Deconstruction theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Pfeffer, J., & Ross, J. (1982). The effects of marriage and a working wife on occupational and wage attainment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 66–80.
Poole, M. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 562-578.
Posner, B. Z., Kouzes, J. M., & Schmidt, W. H. (1985). Shared Values Make a Difference: An Empirical Test of Corporate Culture. Human Resource Management, 24(3), 293-309.
Quatro, S. A., Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2007). Developing Holistic Leaders: Four domains for leadership development and practice. Human Resource Management Review 17(4), 427-441.
Rosenbach, W. E., Pittman, T. S., & Potter, E. H. (2012). What Makes a Follower? Contemporary Issues In Leadership, 77-87.
Rosenbaum, J. (1984). Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Scotter, J. R. V., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of Task Performance and Contextual Performance on Systemic Rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526-535.
Seibert, S., Crant, J., & Kraimer, M. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416–427.
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A Social Capital Theory of Career Success. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(381-403).
Tharenou, P. (1997). Managerial Career Advancement. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 39–93.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 83-104.
Vianen, A. E. M. V., Shen, C.-T., & Chuang, A. (2011). Person–organization and person–supervisor fit: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 906–926.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1809-1824.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Followers′ Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel psychology, 50, 979-1006.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577-595.
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in over-identified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118-154.
Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders′ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 822-834.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organization. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995

中文文獻
行政院主計總處(2017)。105年12月暨全年薪資與生產力統計結果。台北市:行政院。
行政院主計總處(2017)。薪資及生產力統計。取自:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2830
邱郁雅(2017)。矛盾追隨行為量表之建立(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
國家發展委員會(2016)我國薪資成長與所得分配分析及對策。台北市:國家發展委員會。
莊璦嘉、林惠彥(2005)。個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響。台灣管理學刊,5(1),123-148。
陳明哲(2014)。文化雙融:一位管理學者的反思與行踐。管理學報,31(4),263-282。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
楊大春(1994)。解構理論。台北市:揚智文化。
趙慧軍(2013)。追随行為的探索性研究。經濟與管理研究, 4,106-110。
潘涵筠(2010)功高震主的權力分析:權力差距理論的驗證(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。
顏名蔚(2013)。工作績效、個人與主管配適與主管晉升力評分的關聯性(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
羅文豪(2015)。追隨研究的歷史溯源,現實驅力與未來展望。中國人力資源開發,15,6-15。
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2017-7-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明