高齡員工未來時間觀、選擇、最適化與補償模式 對持續工作動機之研究— 跨層次探討高齡相關人力資源措施的調節式效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：77

、訪客IP：18.221.11.166

姓名

蔡靜微(Ching-Wei Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

高齡員工未來時間觀、選擇、最適化與補償模式對持續工作動機之研究— 跨層次探討高齡相關人力資源措施的調節式效果

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究以社會情緒選擇理論為基礎，以未來時間觀、SOC策略為個體層自變項，持續工作動機為依變項，探討未來時間觀長短、運用SOC策略與持續工作動機的關聯。並進一步以二構面的高齡人力資源措施-提供未來發展資源、友善高齡工作環境為組織層調節變項，進行跨層次階層分析方式分析，冀望證明其調節效果。
研究對象為45歲(含)以上高齡員工，以立意及便利抽樣的方式發放問卷，並以發放兩階段問卷的方式避免共同方法變異，最終有效樣本數為42家公司339份。研究結果顯示；高齡員工未來時間觀、運用SOC策略與持續工作動機具有正向關聯。並且高齡員工認知組織施行較好的提供未來發展資源、友善高齡工作環境的人力資源管理措施，在員工未來時間觀、運用SOC策略與持續工作動機間具有調節效果，本研究並針對此上述結果提出進一步的歸納與討論，期望本研究對於未來勞動力高齡化的狀況在人力資源上提出學術與實務面之建言。

摘要(英)

This study is based on the socioemotional selectivity theory to find out the relationship among 3 variables. The variables include 2 independent variables, future time perspective and SOC model strategies, and 1 dependent variable, continuous working motivation. For a further research on this topic; 2 aspects of future aging HR preventions, providing resources of future development and an aged-friendly workplace, have applied as the moderators of multilevel analysis for finding the adjust effects.

The objects of this study are the employees over 45 years old (including employees with the age of 45). For convenience and purposive sampling; a 2-stage questionnaire which allows to avoid common method variation was developed to collect data in 42 sampling companies. Overall, a total of 339 questionnaires were returned. The result of this study has shown a positive relation among the 3 variables. Moreover, the cognition to the elder employees; the better future develop resource offering and age-friendly workplace providing of organization will have greater moderating effects. Based on the results mentioned above, we made a further organization and discussion, and hope to bring up academically and practice suggestions for the aging labor force in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 未來時間觀
★ SOC策略(選擇、最適化與補償模式)
★ 持續工作動機
★ 提供未來發展資源
★ 友善高齡工作環境

關鍵字(英)

★ Future time perspective
★ SOC (selection, optimization and compensation) model strategies
★ continuous working motivation
★ provide resource for future development
★ age-friendly workplace

論文目次

目錄

中文摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
誌謝 vi
目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 2
1-3 研究目的 4
第二章文獻探討與假設 5
2-1 未來時間觀 5
2-2選擇、最適化與補償模式 6
2-3 持續工作動機 7
2-4 未來時間觀、選擇、補償、與最適化理論與持續工作動機 8
2-5 高齡相關人力資源管理措施 9
第三章研究方法 14
3-1 研究架構 14
3-2 研究對象與資料搜集 15
3-3 研究變項及衡量 16
3-4 分析方法 19
第四章資料分析與結果 20
4-1 樣本描述 20
4-2 資料整合 21
4-3 假設驗證 21
第五章研究結論與討論 26
5-1 結論與討論 26
5-2 研究貢獻 31
5-3 管理意涵 33
5-4 研究限制與未來研究建議 34
參考文獻 37
中文資料 37
英文資料 42

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文資料
中華民國統計資訊網. (2015). 人力資源統計年報，取自http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc4/manpower/year/year_t1-t22.asp?table=7&ym=1&y earb=97&yeare=97。
行政院主計處第四局. (2000). 台灣地區中高齡者就業狀況之研析，取自
www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/71017168771.doc
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局. (2012). 中高齡者職務再設計中程計畫. 台北市行
政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
成之約. (2007). 政府部門勞務委外對勞動與社會影響之初探. 台灣勞工雙月刊, 台北: 行政院勞工委員會, 5, 9-17.
余靜佳. (2002). 企業僱用與中高齡勞工就業傾向特性之研究. 長榮管理學院經營管理研究所(碩士論文). 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/85519182296769505997
吳孟津. (2016). 中高齡員工未來時間觀, 認知未來機會與持續工作動機間的關係—調節式中介模型的檢驗. 中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/01398379736182647124
李雅慧, & 葉俊廷. (2010). 職場老化的因應策略: 中高齡者能力移轉的實施. 中正教育研究, 9(2), 89-127.
杜唯聖. (2006). 退休老人在就業生涯歷程之研究. 國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士班碩士論文, 未出版, 屏東市.
沈緯鈞, & 廖主民. (2012). 社會情緒選擇理論的探討與應用. 中華體育季刊, 26(3), 313-320.
周玟琪. (2007). 中高齡者與老年人年齡層界定問題之探討. 就業安全, 6, 66-72.
周玟琪. (2008). 從新批判老年學觀點論台灣民眾對未來退休年齡與退休後再就業意願與型態之分析. 2008 年行政院國科會高齡社會研究成果學術研討會, 台北市.
周淑楓. (2007). 未來取向之自我调整學習歷程模式分析. 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/46068467558028363381
周俐君. (2016). 高齡員工持續工作動機之研究— 探討知覺高齡相關人資方案
調節式中介作用. 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文. 取自
http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/78569321675124291051
易永嘉. (2007). 美國, 澳大利亞, 日本因應高齡化社會之就業策略及借鏡. 臺灣勞工雙月刊, 7, 107-120.
林鉦棽, & 彭台光. (2006). 多層次管理研究: 分析層次的概念, 理論和方法. 管理學報, 23(6), 649-675.
林秀玲. (2014). 小學生未來時間觀、學習動機及學習成就之相關研究. (未出版
之碩士論文)，國立臺灣師範大學，台北市.
林麗惠. (2006). 高齡者學習者成功老化之研究. 人口學刊, 33, 13.
林薏茹. ( 2014). 超高齡社會來臨2030年將有34國加入行列. TECH News. 取自
http://technews.tw/2014/0
林文政, 周俐君, 吳孟津, & 黃延慶. (2016). 高齡員工相關人力資源管理方案量表之建立. 取自
http://ncuhrmhrindex.blogspot.tw/
邱英豪. (2006). 國中學生未來時間觀照之研究. 國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/84289612407463864520
俞承達. (2010). 內控人格, 成就動機, 職涯滿意對軍訓教官自我啟發訓練動機之影響, 國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/73626240924899854978
孫佳佳, & 吳錚. (2009). 個人退休决策的影响因素研究. 湖北社會科學, 2009(5), 51-54.
張火燦. (1996). 策略性人力資源管理, 台北: 揚智文化事業股份有限公司.
莊瑋亨. (2015). 高齡員工未來時間觀與持續工作動機的關係-以選擇最適化補償策略為調節變項. 中央大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/98083006465338146917
郭崑謨, 吳智, 梁世安, 王永正, 詹毓玲, 徐純慧, 池進通 (1996). 人事管理. 台北市: 國立空中大學, 26.
陳侑廷. (2015). 員工未來時間觀與工作動機之關聯探討-以認知與年齡有關人力資源管理措施為調節變項. 中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/09347396666310332245
陳璿憶. (2011). 中高齡勞工工作價值觀與求職傾向的探討. 政治大學勞工研究所學位論文, 1-130. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/17081464352952643233
國家發展委員會.（2014）. 中華民國人口推計（民103年至150年）. 台北市
國家發展委員會.
黃延慶. (2016). 知覺與年齡有關的人力資源管理, 工作成長動機與中高齡員工持續工作動機關聯性之研究-調節式中介效果之檢驗. 中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/73024820078861753940
楊盈芝. (2015). 選擇, 最適化與補償模式策略與工作動機的關係—以認知與年齡有關人力資源管理措施為調節變項. 中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文. 取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/81406780826551765367
溫福星. (2006). 階層線性模式: 原理, 方法與應用: 雙葉書廊有限公司.
溫福星, & 邱皓政. (2009). 組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果: 以組織創新氣氛, 組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例. 管理學報, 26(2), 189-211.
劉素卿. (2013). 職業學校設計群學生未來時間觀與技能自我調整學習關係之
究. (未出版之碩士論文)，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣.
蔡榮貴. (2011). 高齡者健康促進與活躍老化關係模式建構與驗證. 計畫編號: CN10013; 計畫年度: 100.
蔡懷德. (2017). 態度勝過一切，四位祖父母級的超級模特兒。取自
http://news.knowing.asia/news/f396d64f-6140-42cb-8a31-1cc56ba18a5
賴玉雪. (2011). 組織支持, 自我導向學習, 工作投入與工作保障感之關聯性─ 以中高齡勞工為例. 碩士論文, 國立東華大學國際企業管理學系.
謝依純. (2012). 影響台灣中高齡者退休年齡之因素. 台灣老年學論壇, 14. 取自
http://www.iog.ncku.edu.tw/riki/riki.php?id=TGF14&CID=1
顧秀琴. (2006). 公務人員退休後再就業之研究-以台北市政府交通局為例. 政治大學行政管理碩士學程學位論文, 1-117.

英文資料

Abele, A. E., & Wiese, B. S. (2008). The nomological network of self‐management strategies and career success. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 733-749.
Abraham, J. D., & Hansson, R. O. (1995). Successful aging at work: An applied study of selection, optimization, and compensation through impression management. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(2), P94-P103.
Abumandil, M. S. (2012). Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction: A Study Among Academicians at Al-Azhar University-Gaza. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Armstrong‐Stassen, M. (2008). Organisational practices and the post‐retirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), 36-53.
Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 201-220.
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 545-572.
Baltes, B. B., & Heydens-Gahir, H. A. (2003). Reduction of work-family conflict through the use of selection, optimization, and compensation behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1005.
Baltes, P., Baltes, M., Freund, A., & Lang, F. (1995). Measurement of selective optimization with compensation by questionnaire. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences, 1(1), 1-34.
Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Academic Delay of Gratification, Future Goals, and Self-Regulated Learning.
Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review, 16(1), 35-57.
Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology In MDunnette. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology Chicago Rand McNally.
Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrance Erlbaum.
Doering, M., Rhodes, S. R., & Schuster, M. R. (1983). The aging worker: Research and recommendations: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ekerdt, D. J., Bossé, R., & Mogey, J. M. (1980). Concurrent change in planned and preferred age for retirement. Journal of Gerontology, 35(2), 232-240.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002a). The adaptiveness of selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Evidence from a preference study on proverbs. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(5), P426-P434.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002b). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(4), 642.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Hagiwara, M. (1988). Teinensei no rekishi (History of the Teinen system). Tokyo: Nihon Rodo Kyokai, as cited in Oka, M.(2008). Japan: Towards employment extension for older workers. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Ageing labour forces: Promises and prospects, 40-61.
Hale, N. (1990). The older worker: Effective strategies for management and human resource development: Jossey-Bass.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of management, 23(6), 723-744.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 113-125.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85.
Jones, G. R., & Wright, P. M. (1992). An economic approach to conceptualizing the utility of human resource management practices. Research in personnel and human resources management, 10, 271-299.
Kanfer, R., Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Goals and motivation related to work in later adulthood: An organizing framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(3), 253-264.
Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American sociological review, 499-517.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2): Wiley New York.
Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic management journal, 335-354.
Kooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers′ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age: A conceptual review. Journal of managerial psychology, 23(4), 364-394.
Kooij, D., & Van De Voorde, K. (2011). How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 228-247.
Kooij, D. T., Bal, P. M., & Kanfer, R. (2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation. Psychology and aging, 29(2), 319.
Kooij, D. T., Jansen, P. G., Dikkers, J. S., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1111-1136.
Kooij, T. (2010). Motivating older workers: a lifespan perspective on the role of perceived HR practices.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and aging, 17(1), 125.
Lu, L. (2012). Attitudes towards aging and older people′s intentions to continue working: a Taiwanese study. Career Development International, 17(1), 83-98.
Marshall, V. W., & Marshall, J. G. (2003). Ageing and work in Canada: Firm policies. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 28(4), 625-639.
McKinnon, J. L., Harrison, G. L., Chow, C. W., & Wu, A. (2003). Organizational culture: Association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to remain, and information sharing in Taiwan. International journal of business studies, 11(1), 25.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2003). Gaining a competitive advantage: Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
Ouwehand, C., de Ridder, D. T., & Bensing, J. M. (2007). A review of successful aging models: Proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy. Clinical psychology review, 27(8), 873-884.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1): Sage.
Restrepo, B. J. (2016). Parental investment responses to a low birth weight outcome: who compensates and who reinforces? Journal of Population Economics, 29(4), 969-989. doi:10.1007/s00148-016-0590-3
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International journal of behavioral development, 12(1), 35-55.
Shacklock, K., Brunetto, Y., & Nelson, S. (2009). The different variables that affect older males′ and females′ intentions to continue working. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 79-101.
Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 637.
Truss, C., Gratton, L., Hope‐Hailey, V., Stiles, P., & Zaleska, J. (2002). Paying the piper: choice and constraint in changing HR functional roles. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 39-63.
Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2013). Research themes on age and work: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(3), 249-252.
Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Organizational Behavior, 21, 201.
Vallerand, R. J., O′Connor, B. P., & Hamel, M. (1995). Motivation in later life: Theory and assessment. The International Journal of Aging and human development, 41(3), 221-238.
Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 76-84.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of management, 18(2), 295-320.
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 291-318.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2017-8-16

推文