![]() |
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數:30 、訪客IP:13.59.157.149
姓名 翁崇期(Chung-Chi Weng) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 土木工程學系 論文名稱 土壤液化引致側向滑移對樁基礎之影響及其對策
(Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading and its effect and mitigation on pile foundations)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
[下載]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
摘要(中) 傾斜的緩坡地層若為具液化潛能的疏鬆砂,地震發生時便容易液化造成側向滑移現象,若能更加瞭解側向滑移對緩坡地層中樁基礎所造成之影響,將有助於評估在可能液化地盤之結構物樁基礎的耐震能力,同時也可減少地震引致之土壤液化災害,並提升基礎耐震設計之合理性與經濟性,因此在土壤液化引致側向滑移情況下樁基礎之行為,有進行研究之必要性。
在深度為12.5 m 的砂土地盤,透過輸入1Hz、15 次振動(cycles)的非等振幅類正弦波(Hanning-window)作為主要振動事件,樁基礎樁徑為0.48 m,樁心距為1.2 m,並以鉸接之方式固定於箱底這些條件下所得到之研究成果,可以得出以下結論:(1)在樁頭容許變位為15 mm 下,於純砂層地盤中,單樁基礎最大樁頭側向位移量與土壤反力,和群樁基礎相差不大。單樁基礎最大樁身彎矩高於群樁基礎。於上覆非液化土層地盤中,單樁基礎最大樁頭側向位移量與群樁基礎最大位移量相差不大,單樁基礎最大樁身彎矩高於群樁基礎,而土壤反力方面,單樁基
礎最大土壤反力高於群樁基礎最大土壤反力。(2)主要振動事件中,群樁基礎之最大彎矩、最大土壤反力皆大於單樁基礎,造成此現象之原因,推測是群樁基礎表層樁土相對位移量高於單樁基礎所導致之結果。(3)比較G-type 試驗中之樁頭位移量、最大彎矩量、最大軸力與土壤反力等試驗結果,最大樁頭位移量、最大樁身彎矩量、最大軸力與土壤反力大小依次均為上覆非液化土壤層傾斜地盤,其次為傾斜純砂層地盤,最後則為水平上覆非液化土壤層地盤。(4)試驗GSP-P-T 孔隙水壓消散時間較試驗G-P-T 長,試驗GSP-P-T 所承受之彎矩量、樁身軸力與土壤反力,皆高於試驗G-P-T。而試驗GSP-P-T 樁頭位移量與土壤側向位移量,低於試驗G-P-T。摘要(英) The wide extent of liquefaction-induced lateral flow is a major cause of damage to civil structures. When the pile foundations behavior affected by lateral spreading is well understood, the seismic design and improvement treatments could be applied to such structures. It is necessary to know the pile behavior in sandy ground subjected to lateral spreading.
In this study, the bottom of model piles were hinge connections and the diameters of the piles is 0.48 m. The distance between each pile is 1.2 m. Under the main event of 0.2 g and 15 cycles base input motion, some conclusions can be shown below: (1) Within the allowable lateral displacement 15 mm, the lateral pile displacement and maximum soil reaction is similar in single pile and group piles in pure sand deposit ground. Maximum pile moment of single pile will be higher than that in group piles. In sand deposit ground with one non-liquefied soil layer, the lateral pile displacement is much similar in single pile and group piles. Maximum pile moment and maximum soil reaction of single pile will be higher than group piles. (2) After the main-shaking event, the maximum moment and soil reaction in group piles are higher than those in single pile. (3) In G-type tests, all the order of maximum lateral pile displacement, maximum pile moment, maximum axis froce and maximum soil reaction are test G-M-T > test G-P-T > test G-M-H. (4) The dissipation time of excess pore water pressure in test GS-P-T is longer than test G-P-T, all the maximum pile moment, maximum axis force and maximum soil reaction in test GS-P-T are higher than those in test G-P-T. However, the maximum lateral pile displacement and soil displacement in test GS-P-T are smaller than those in test G-P-T.關鍵字(中) ★ 傾斜地盤
★ 液化引致側向滑移
★ 離心模型試驗
★ 樁基礎關鍵字(英) ★ inclined ground
★ lateral spreading
★ centrifuge tests
★ pile foundations論文目次 摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 引言 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 前言 5
2.2 樁基礎之設計規範 6
2.2.1 API設計手冊 6
2.2.2 內政部「建築物基礎構造設計規範」 8
2.3 液化現象對樁基礎之影響 11
2.3.1 土壤液化與側向滑移 11
2.3.2 樁基礎於土壤液化下的行為 12
2.4 離心模型試驗原理 21
2.4.1 離心模擬原理 21
2.4.2 離心模型之尺度律 23
2.5 樁基礎之分析方法 25
第三章 試驗設備、試驗材料與試驗步驟 28
3.1 前言 28
3.2 試驗設備 28
3.2.1 地工離心機與單軸向振動台 28
3.2.2 移動式霣降儀 30
3.2.3 積層版試驗箱 30
3.2.4 各式感測器 32
3.3 試驗材料 34
3.3.1 試驗土樣與非液化土層製作 34
3.3.2 試驗模型樁 37
3.4 試驗步驟 48
第四章 試驗結果與分析 55
4.1 試驗規劃 55
4.2 試驗結果 67
4.2.1 試驗S-P-T之試驗結果 67
4.2.2 試驗S-M-T之試驗結果 80
4.2.3 試驗G-P-T之試驗結果 92
4.2.4 試驗G-M-T之試驗結果 109
4.2.5 試驗G-M-H之試驗結果 126
4.2.6 試驗GSP-P-T之試驗結果 143
4.3 綜合討論 159
4.3.1 主要振動事件前後剪力波速與土壤主頻 159
4.3.2 上覆非液化土層對單樁與群樁行為之影響 161
4.3.3 「傾斜」與「上覆非液化土層」因素對群樁基礎之影響 189
4.3.4 鈑樁對減緩側向滑移之成效 199
第五章 結論 210
參考資料 212
參考文獻 [1] Abdoun, T. and Dobry, R.D. “Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, pp.1051-1058. (2002).
[2] Abdoun, T., Dobry, R., O’Rourke, T.D. and Goh, S.H. “Pile Response to Lateral Spreads: Centrifuge Modeling,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 10, pp.869-878. (2003).
[3] Acutronic, “Geotechnical Centrifuge Model 665-1 Product Description 5933H,” France (1993).
[4] Acutronic, “Geotechnical Centrifuge Model 665-1 Technical Proposal 6022,” France (1993).
[5] API, “Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design,” (2002).
[6] Brandenberg, S. J., Boulanger, R. W., Kutter, B. L. and Chang D. D. “Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 11, pp.1378-1391. (2005).
[7] Chang, B.J. and Hutchinson, T.C. “Experimental investigation of plastic demands in piles embedded in multi-layered liquefiable soils,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 49, pp.146-156. (2013).
[8] Cubrinovski, M., Kokusho, T. and Ishihara, K. “Interpretation from large-scale shake table tests on piles undergoing lateral spreading in liquefied soils,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 26, pp.275-286. (2006).
[9] Das, B.M. and Sobhan K., Principles of geotechnical engineering, eight edition, Cengage learning, (2010).
[10] E Rovithis, E Kirtas and K Pitilakis, “Experimental p-y loops for estimating seismic soil-pile interaction, ” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 7, pp.719-736. (2009).
[11] Gonzalez, L., Lucas, D. and Abdoun, T. “Centrifuge modeling of pile foundations subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in silty sand,” The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, Beijing, China. (2008).
[12] Motamed, R. and Towhata, I. “Mitigation measures for pile groups behind quay walls subjected to lateral flow of liquefied soil: Shake table model tests,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 30, pp.1043-1060. (2010).
[13] Tanimoto, S., Sugita, H., Takahashi, A. and Takiuchi, T. “Physical modeling and evaluation of pile foundations retrofitted with sheet piles as a measure against liquefaction,”
[14] Taylor, R. N., “Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology,” Hall & Wester, London. (1995).
[15] Ting, J M, Kauffman, C R, Lovicsek, M, “Centrifuge static and dynamic lateral pile behavier, ” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 24:198–207, (1987).
[16] Tokimatsu, K., Suzuki, H. and Sato, M. “Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 25, pp.753-762. (2005).
[17] Wilson, D. W., “Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Liquefying Sand and Soft Clay,”Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering College of Engineering, University of California at Davis (1998).
[18] 內政部營建署,「建築物基礎構造設計規範」,中華民國大地工程學會,台北 (2001)。
[19] 李岳霖,「位於液化地盤樁基礎之離心模型振動台試驗在不同ru時樁之p-y曲線」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2016)。
[20] 李崇正,「離心模型試驗在大地工程之應用」,地工技術雜誌,第36期,第 76-91頁(1991)。
[21] 李崇正、陳慧慈,「集集大震台中港榖類碼頭側移及沉陷初勘」,港灣報導季刊,No. 50, pp.1-10 (1999)。
[22] 李崇正、陳慧慈、洪汶宜、蔡晨暉、陳 婷、涂奕峻、謝孟修,「預振技術在單樁離心模型振動台試驗系統識別的應用」,第十五屆大地工程學術研究討論會,9月11-13日,雲林,台灣 (2013)。
[23] 吳宇浩,「液化地盤群樁基礎地震反應之模擬」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2014)。
[24] 陳正興、黃俊鴻,基礎性能分析,地工技術叢書之十一,財團法人地工技術研究發展基金會(2016)。
[25] 陳正興、陳家漢,「地震引致的土壤液化與側潰現象」,科學發展月刊,第 498期,第12-17 頁(2014)。
[26] 陳銘鴻,「土壤液化成因, 災害與復建」,台灣之活動斷層與地震災害研討會論文集,第107-123頁(2002)。
[27] 黃俊學,「基盤土壤液化對上方土堤位移的影響」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2016)。
[28] 楊宗翰,「具不同上部結構之樁基礎受振行為」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2015)。
指導教授 洪汶宜(Wen-Yi Hung) 審核日期 2018-2-9 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
myshare