教師激勵風格、自我決定動機對於大學生學習投入之探討─以自我效能為調節變數

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：69

、訪客IP：3.135.207.201

姓名

曹育溱(Yu-Chen Tsao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

教師激勵風格、自我決定動機對於大學生學習投入之探討─以自我效能為調節變數
(An Examination of Teachers’ Motivating Style and Self-determined Motivation on Students’ Learning Engagement ─ Self-efficacy as a Moderator)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討教師激勵風格、自我決定動機與學生學習投入之間等重要變項的作用與關聯，並瞭解自我效能的調節效果。本研究以北部某國立大學的三年級學生為研究對象，共計完成95份有效問卷，並以教師自主支持量表、教師結構量表、自我決定動機量表、自我效能量表、學習投入量表作為研究工具。所蒐集的問卷資料以敘述統計分析法、皮爾森積差相關分析法、階層迴歸分析法等進行統計分析。結果有下列發現：
1. 教師自主支持能顯著正向預測整體學習投入，其中在情感投入上有獨特貢獻。
2. 教師結構能顯著正向預測整體學習投入，其中在行為投入和認知投入上的效果比教師自主支持大。
3. 教師自主支持與教師結構皆能顯著正向預測學生之自主動機和控制動機。
4. 學生之自主動機能顯著正向預測整體學習投入，其中在情感投入和認知投入上的效果比控制動機大。
5. 學生之控制動機在行為投入上有獨特貢獻。
6. 教師自主支持與教師結構皆能透過學生之自主動機和控制動機之部分中介來間接影響整體學習投入的情形。
7. 自我效能在教師結構與整體學習投入之間有顯著調節效果。

摘要(英)

This study aimed to investigate the relations of important variables among teachers’ motivating style, self-determined motivation and learning engagement, and
also understand the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Ninety-five valid data collected from the third-year students in a public university in northern Taiwan. The questionnaire that included Autonomy Support Scale, Structure Scale, Self-efficacy Scale, Academic Motivational Regulation Scale and Student Learning Engagement Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation and Hierachical regression were used in data analysis. The results were follows:
1. Teachers’ autonomy support can positively predict learning engagement, and there were a unique contribution to emotional engagement.
2. Teachers’ structure can positively predict learning engagement and can better predict behavioral engagement and cognitive engagement than autonomy support.
3. Both teachers’ autonomy support and teachers’ structure can positively predict autonomous motivation and controlled motivation.
4. Autonomous motivation can positively predict learning engagement and can better predict emotional engagement and cognitive engagement than controlled motivation.
5. Controlled motivation had a unique contribution to behavioral engagement.
6. Both teachers’ autonomy support and teachers’ structure had indirect influence on learning engagement through autonomous motivation and controlled motivation.
7. Self-efficacy had the moderating effect on teachers’ structure and learning engagement.

關鍵字(中)

★ 教師自主支持
★ 教師結構
★ 自我決定動機
★ 自我效能
★ 學習投入

關鍵字(英)

★ teachers’ autonomy support
★ teachers’ structure
★ self-determined motivation
★ self-efficacy
★ learning engagement

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 4
1.3 論文架構 4
1.4 研究流程 5
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1 教師激勵風格 6
2.1.1 教師自主支持 7
2.1.2 教師結構 8
2.2 自我決定動機 10
2.3 自我效能 12
2.4 學習投入 15
2.5 研究變項之間的相關研究 18
第三章研究方法 21
3.1 研究架構 21
3.2 研究假說 22
3.3 研究對象及研究工具 22
3.4 資料分析方法 27
第四章研究結果與討論 29
4.1 信效度分析 29
4.2 敘述統計分析 34
4.3 皮爾森積差相關分析 36
4.4 迴歸分析 37
4.5 階層迴歸分析 45
4.6 路徑分析結果 47
4.7 假說檢定的分析結果 50
第五章研究結論與建議 51
5.1 研究結論 51
5.2 研究貢獻及管理意涵 54
5.3 研究限制與建議 55
參考文獻 56
中文部份 56
英文部份 57
附錄一研究問卷 63
附錄二各題項之敘述統計分析 67

參考文獻

中文部份
吳明隆（2006）。SPSS 統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北市：知城數位科技股份有限公司。
吳靜吉、程炳林（1992）。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報，66，13-39。
林哲立（2010）。教師支持對學生需求滿足與學習投入之影響 - 以台灣地區高中學生為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
林啟超（2011）。「高職學生學業動機調節量表」構念效度驗證之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，7（4），75-102。
林淑惠、黃韞臻（2012）。「大學生學習投入量表」之發展。測驗學刊， 59（3），373-396。
邱珍琬（2013）。大學生生活樣態與轉變：以南部一公立大學為例。中正教育研究，12（1），29-40。
施淑慎（2008）。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究，31（2），1-26。
施淑慎（2009）。國中生使用逃避策略相關因素徑路模式之檢驗。教育與心理研究，32（1），111-145。
施淑慎（2010）。父母態度、教師之自主支持及心理控制與國中生完美主義傾向間關係之探究。彰化師大教育學報，17（0），1-28。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學。台北市：東華書局。
許清淵（2014）。國小高年級學童知覺社會自主性支持、閱讀自我決定動機與閱讀行為之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
陳美芳（2012）。大專體育課學生調節動機和知覺教師自主支持對於課後正向情緒與持續努力的影響。休閒運動期刊，11，81-92。
陳惠珍（2010）。國中生對任課教師自主知覺、自主動機與學習投入之關係研究—以數學科為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
劉鎔毓（2007）。大學生課業學習相關經驗分析：一般生與技職生之比較。課程研究，2（2），91-121。
盧宥廷（2017）。大學生覺知教師班級經營類型、大學生學習投入與其學業應得權益感關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
賴丹鳳、伍新春（2011）。基於自我決定理論的教師激勵風格研究述評。心理科學進展，19（4），580-588。

英文部份
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London : Sage.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y. and Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and
boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent:autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students′
engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Audas, R., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Engagement and dropping out of school: A lifecourse perspective. Hull, Canada: Human Resources Development Canada.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of Cognitive Processes through Perceived Self-Efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729-735.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Benware, C., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765.
Black, A.E., Deci, E.L. (2000). The Effects of Instructors’ Autonomy Support and
Students’ Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation:
Perspectives on motivation, 38, 237-288. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L.G., Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 325-346.
Finn, J.D. (1989). Withdrawing from School. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Frey, A., Ruchkin, V., Martin, A., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2009). Adolescents in transition: School and family characteristics in the development of violent
behaviors entering high school. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 40(1), 1–13.
Garbarino, J. (1975). The impact of anticipated reward upon cross-age tutoring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 421–428.
Hollembeak, J., & Amorose, A. J. (2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes′ intrinsic motivation: A test of self‐determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(1), 20–36.
Hospel, V., Galand, B. (2015). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students′ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and
Instruction, 41, 1-10.
Hsu, W. T., Wu, K. H., Wang, Y. C., Hsiao, C.H., Wu, H.C. (2013). Autonomy and structure can enhance motivation of volunteers in sport organizations. Perceptual
& Motor Skills: Exercise & Sport, 117(3), 709-719.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E.L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600.
Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorical simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36.
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1977). The effects of performance relevant and performance irrelevant rewards on children′s intrinsic motivation. Child Development, 48, 482-487.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What We′re Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE:Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-21.
Lam, S.-f., Jimerson, S., Wong, B., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C.,et al. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 213-132.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of Self-Efficacy Expectation to Academic Achievement and Persistence. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 31(3), 356-362.
Lepper, M.R., Greene D., Nisbett R.E. (1973). Undermining children′s intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the overjustification hypothesis. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–37.
Lester, D. (2013). A Review of the Student Engagement Literature. Focus on Colleges, Universities and Schools, 7(1), 1–8.
Lim, B. S. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of
Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52-60.
Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13,
251–258.
Morgan, M. (1984). Reward-induced decrements and increments in intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 54, 5-30. Nix, G.A., Ryan, R.M., Manly, J.B., & Deci, E.L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous versus controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 266-284.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self‐efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158.
Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the
academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781–791.
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306.
Reeve, J. (2006). Teacher as Facilitators: What Autonomy-Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225-236.
Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand. R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734-746.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self‐determination perspective theory on student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.
Reeve, J., Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion,
28(2), 147-169.
Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning.
Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165-185.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137.
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and selfevaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy-support and structure in the
prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57-68.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of
motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M. and Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 97–110.
Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the
literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65–87.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student Engagement Literature Review. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology(pp.271-360). San Diego: Academic press.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., Aelterman., N., Haerens, L., Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of
perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6),
431-439.
Zaltman, G. and Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing Research: Fundamentals and Dynamics, New York: Macmillian College Publishing Company.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82 – 91.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou)

審核日期

2018-6-8

推文