利用XAPI開發和評估在真實情境的無所不在幾何學習

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：39

、訪客IP：18.191.111.130

姓名

楊拉馬(Yan Amal Abdilah) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

利用XAPI開發和評估在真實情境的無所不在幾何學習
(Development and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Geometry Learning in Authentic Contexts with Experience API)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究的目的是調查真實學習中學習行為與四年級學生學習成績之間的關係。調查包括行為的質量和數量。在台北三民小學，學生們使用我們的Ubiquitous Geometry（UG）系統學習角度和多邊形。 UG系統利用xAPI規範記錄三種學習行為，如真實測量，註釋和同伴評估。共有53名學生參加本研究，由對照組的27名學生和實驗組的26名學生組成。統計分析表明，實驗組學習成績較好。真實的測量對結果產生了最大的影響。特別是利用鏡頭和陀螺儀傳感器測量仰角和俯仰角。他們多次測量許多物體以滿足學習的需要。另一個發現是繪圖功能是註釋和同伴評估活動中最有價值的功能。學生們使用繪畫功能以不同的表現形式（數字，符號和文本）表達自己的想法。他們為他們的繪畫使用了各種顏色。學生不能從同伴評估中獲益。大多數學生覺得繪畫可以指出誤解的地方。同時，學生評論文本的意義不大。本研究強烈建議利用科技從學習幾何的真實環境中學習。系統應該開發功能來評分行為的品質。這樣可以收集更複雜的數據，並可以在未來的研究中進行更深入的分析。

摘要(英)

The aim of this study is to investigate relationship between learning behaviors and learning achievement of fourth grade students in authentic learning. The investigation included quality and quantity of behaviors. In Sanmin Elementary School, Taipei, the students used our Ubiquitous Geometry (UG) system to learn angle and polygon. UG system utilized xAPI specification to record three learning behaviors, such as authentic measurement, annotation, and peer assessment. Total of 53 students joined this study, consisted of 27 students in control group and 26 students in experimental group. The statistical analysis showed that experimental group has better learning achievement. Authentic measurement contributed the biggest effect for the result. Especially, measuring angle of elevation and depression which utilize camera and gyro sensor. They measured many objects several times to fill their satisfaction in learning. Another finding is that drawing feature is most valuable feature in annotation and peer assessment activities. Students used drawing feature to express their ideas in different representations (figures, symbols, and texts). They used various colors for their drawing. Students can not benefit much from peer assessment. Most of students commend drawing were circles that pointed out misconception. Meanwhile, students comment texts were less meaningful. This study strongly recommends utilization of advance technology to learn from authentic contexts for learning geometry. System capability to score behaviors’ quality should be developed. So that more complex data can be collected and deeper analysis can be conducted in the future studies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 泛在幾何
★ 學習行為
★ 真實任務
★ 多重表徵
★ 同伴評估
★ 體驗API

關鍵字(英)

★ Ubiquitous-Geometry
★ learning behavior
★ authentic task
★ multiple representation
★ peer assessment
★ experience API

論文目次

中文摘要 V
Abstract VI
Acknowledgement VIII
Table of Contents IX
List of Figures XII
List of Tables XIII
List of Appendix XIV
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1-1 BACKGROUND 1
1-2 PURPOSE 4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2-1 AUTHENTIC CONTEXTS 5
2-2 UBIQUITOUS GEOMETRY LEARNING 6
2-2-1 Framework of Ubiquitous Geometry 9
2-2-2 Theory of Learning Geometry (Van Heile) 10
2-3 IMPORTANT LEARNING BEHAVIOR 12
2-3-1 Authentic Measurement 12
2-3-2 Multiple Representation (Annotation) 13
2-3-3 Peer Assessment 13
2-4 EXPERIENCE API (xAPI) 14
2-4-1 xAPI Statement 15
2-4-2 Learning Record Store LRS 16
2-5 MEASURING STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD TECHNOLOGY 17
2-6 MEASURING STUDENTS’ LEARNING MOTIVATION 18
3. UBIQUITOUS GEOMETRY SYSTEM DESIGN 20
3-1 Authentic Context 20
3-2 Learning Activities 20
3-2-1 Basic Angle (school curriculum) 20
3-2-2 Advance Angle (additional topic) 21
3-2-3 Peer Assessment 23
3-3 Seamlessness 23
4. RESEARCH METHOD 24
4-1 TYPES OF RESEARCH 24
4-2 RESEARCH ARCHITECTURE AND RESEARCH VARIABLES 24
4-2-1 Control Variable 25
4-2-2 Independent Variable 25
4-2-3 Dependent Variable 25
4-3 RESEARCH PROCEDURE 27
4-3-1 Preparation 28
4-3-2 Data Collection 29
4-3-3 Result 30
4-4 RESEARCH SUBJECTS 31
4-5 DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING 31
4-5-1 Learning Behavior 31
4-5-2 Learning Achievement 32
4-5-3 Students Perception toward UG System 32
4-5-4 Students Motivation in Authentic Learning 33
4-5-5 Interview 33
4-6 DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE 33
5. RESULT AND ANALYSIS 34
5-1 LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS 34
5-2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING BEHAVIORS AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT 37
5-1-1 Based on Quality of Student’s Learning Behavior 37
5-1-2 Based on Quantity of Student’s Learning Behavior 43
5-3 STUDENTS PERCEPTION TOWARD USING UG SYSTEM IN AUTHENTIC LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 48
6. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 50
6-1 CONCLUSION 50
6-2 SUGGESTION 51
REFERENCES 53
APPENDIX 57

參考文獻

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posingଝ, 21.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society,. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press.
Dysthe, O. (2006). The challenges of assessment in a new learning culture. Conference Iceland Pedagogical University, Reykjavik, Iceland, 24.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. s.n.], S.l.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Hwang, W.-Y., Lin, L.-K., Ochirbat, A., Shih, T. K., & Kumara, W. G. C. W. (2015). Ubiquitous Geometry: Measuring Authentic Surroundings to Support Geometry Learning of the Sixth-Grade Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633114568852
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
Kelly, L. (2015). Effectiveness of Guided Peer Review of Student Essays in a Large Undergraduate Biology Course, 13.
Li, L., Zheng, Y., Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). A framework of ubiquitous learning environment. In The Fourth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2004. CIT ’04 (pp. 345–350). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2004.1357219
Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Issues and Challenges in Ubiquitous Computing. Communications of the ACM, 45(12). https://doi.org/10.1145/585597.585616
McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65(6), 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z
McLeod, J. D., & Kaiser, K. (2004). Childhood Emotional and Behavioral Problems and Educational Attainment. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 636–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900502
Nakahara, T. (2007). Cultivating Mathematical Thinking through Representation. APEC - Tsukuba International Conference III, 9.
Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: restructuring schools for intellectual quality. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an Understanding of Authentic Learning: Student Perceptions of an Authentic Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477008671
Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning (pp. 27–34). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281330
Panaoura, A. (2014). Using representations in geometry: a model of students’ cognitive and affective performance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(4), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.851804
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Protheroe, N. (2007). What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? Principal, 87(1), 51–54.
Purwoko. (2007). Teori Van Hiele & Penerapannya dalam Pemb. Mat_Unit_1. Semarang: UNNES.
Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The Components of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 10.
Simatwa, E. M. W. (2010). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development and its implication for instructional management at pre- secondary school level, 6.
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–169.
Topping, Keith J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3301299
Wang, H. (2017). Construction of xAPI-based Multimedia Interaction Technology in Architectural Design Teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(07), 101. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i07.7220
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0
Zhang, G., Jin, Q., & Shih, T. K. (2005). Peer-to-Peer Based Social Interaction Tools in Ubiquitous Learning Environment. Th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 7.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang Nurkhamid)

審核日期

2018-6-28

推文