參考文獻 |
[1] Adesemowo, A. K., Johannes, H., Goldstone, S., & Terblanche, K. (2016). The experience of introducing secure e-assessment in a South African university first-year foundational ICT networking course. Africa Education Review, 13(1), 67-86.
[2] Ahmad, A. (2017). Developing Cooperative Learning Based E-Module to Teach Basic English Grammar of the First Semester of English Study Program Students at FKIP–UIR. Journal of English for Academic, 4(2), 1-11.
[3] Alameddine, M. M., & Mirza, H. S. (2016). Teaching Academic Writing for Advanced Level Grade 10 English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 209-216.
[4] Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge university press.
[5] Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193-211.
[6] Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G. Z. (2016). Global trends and research aims for English academic oral presentations: Changes, challenges, and opportunities for learning technology. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1227-1271.
[7] Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75-87.
[8] Bouckenooghe, D., Cools, E., De Clercq, D., Vanderheyden, K., & Fatima, T. (2016). Exploring the impact of cognitive style profiles on different learning approaches: Empirical evidence for adopting a person-centered perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 299-306.
[9] Cam, L., & Tran, T. T. M. (2017). An Evaluation of using Games in Teaching English Grammar for First Year English-Majored Students at Dong Nai Technology University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 55-71.
[10] Chan, C. H., Hsieh, C. W., & Y. Chen, S. (2014). Cognitive styles and the use of electronic journals in a mobile context. Journal of Documentation, 70(6), 997-1014.
[11] Chen, C. H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1201-1212.
[12] Chen, S. Y., & Chang, L. P. (2016). The influences of cognitive styles on individual learning and collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 458-471.
[13] Chen, S. Y., & Yeh, C. C. (2017). The effects of cognitive styles on the use of hints in academic English: A learning analytics approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 251-264.
[14] Chen, Z. H., Chen, S. Y., & Chien, C. H. (2017). Students’ Reactions to Different Levels of Game Scenarios: A Cognitive Style Approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 69-77.
[15] Choi, E. T., Kim, Y. N., Cho, W. S., & Lee, D. K. (2016). The effects of visual control whole body vibration exercise on balance and gait function of stroke patients. Journal of physical therapy science, 28(11), 3149-3152.
[16] Chuang, T. Y., Liu, E. Z. F., & Shiu, W. Y. (2015). Game-based creativity assessment system: the application of fuzzy theory. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(21), 9141-9155.
[17] Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining Learning Preferences in Web-based Instruction: Holists vs. Serialists. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (4), 266-277.
[18] Cumming, A., Yang, L., Qiu, C., Zhang, L., Ji, X., Wang, J., ... & Cao, R. (2018). Students’ practices and abilities for writing from sources in English at universities in China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 1-15.
[19] DePasque, S., & Tricomi, E. (2015). Effects of intrinsic motivation on feedback processing during learning. NeuroImage, 119, 175-186.
[20] Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 557–573.
[21] Fang, L., Tuan, L. A., Hui, S. C., & Wu, L. (2018). Syntactic based approach for grammar question retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 54(2), 184-202.
[22] Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243-264.
[23] Forbes, K. (2018). The role of individual differences in the development and transfer of writing strategies between foreign and first language classrooms. Research Papers in Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452963.
[24] Ford, N. (1985). Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 65-77.
[25] Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A., Ellis, D., & Spink, A. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 4. Cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 728-735.
[26] Galloway, E. P., & Uccelli, P. (2015). Modeling the relationship between lexico-grammatical and discourse organization skills in middle grade writers: insights into later productive language skills that support academic writing. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 797-828.
[27] Greiff, S., Wustenberg, S., Holt, D. V., Goldhammer, F., & Funke, J. (2013). Computer-based assessment of Complex Problem Solving: concept, implementation, and application. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 407-421.
[28] Guerrero-Roldan, A. E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36-46.
[29] Hartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding and Cooperative Learning. Human Learning and Instruction. New York: City College of City University of New York
[30] Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 1-14.
[31] Howie, D. (1995). To the Beat of a Different Drummer: The Role of Individual Differences in Ecological Interface Design. [Technical Report]. Cognitive Engineering Laboratory. University of Tornado, Canada.
[32] Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). A cognitive style perspective to handheld devices: customization vs. personalization. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1).
[33] Hsieh, Y. H., Lin, Y. C., & Hou, H. T. (2016). Exploring the role of flow experience, learning performance and potential behavior clusters in elementary students′ game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 178-193.
[34] Hu, K. (2016). Corpus-Based Interpreting Studies. In Introducing Corpus-based Translation Studies (pp. 193-221). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[35] Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2005). A student′s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge University Press.
[36] Ivanova, M., Rozeva, A., & Durcheva, M. (2016). Towards e-Assessment Models in Engineering Education: Problems and Solutions. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 178-181). Springer, Cham.
[37] Jeong, J. S., Ramirez-Gomez, A., & Gonzalez-Gomez, D. (2017). A web-based scaffolding-learning tool for design students’ sustainable spatial planning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(4), 262-277.
[38] Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual differences and instruction. New York: Allen & Bacon.
[39] Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Routledge. New York, NY.
[40] Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241-1263.
[41] Khaliliaqdam, S. (2014). ZPD, scaffolding and basic speech development in EFL context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 891-897.
[42] Koro?lu, Z. C., & Cak?r, A. (2017). Implementation of flipped instruction in language classrooms: An alternative way to develop speaking skills of pre-service English language teachers. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 13(2), 42-55.
[43] Ku, O., Hou, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Incorporating customization and personalization into game-based learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 359-368.
[44] Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first year students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1853-1858.
[45] Kwan, B. S. C. (2013). Facilitating novice researchers in project publishing during the doctoral years and beyond: A Hong Kong-based study. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 207-225.
[46] Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2013). From particular to popular: Facilitating EFL mobile-supported cooperative reading. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 23-38.
[47] Langum, V., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Writing academic English as a doctoral student in Sweden: narrative perspectives. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 20-25.
[48] Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of second language writing, 33, 21-34.
[49] Leedham, M., & Cai, G. (2013). Besides… on the other hand: Using a corpus approach to explore the influence of teaching materials on Chinese students’ use of linking adverbials. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 374-389.
[50] Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Allen, J. A. (2014). How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1278.
[51] Lindemann?Matthies, P., & Kamer, T. (2006). The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors′ learning in a Swiss zoo. Science Education, 90(2), 296-315.
[52] Ma, L. P. F. (2017). Academic writing support through individual consultations: EAL doctoral student experiences and evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing.
[53] Mampadi, F., Chen, S. Y., Ghinea, G., & Chen, M. P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: A cognitive style approach. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1003-1011.
[54] McCredden, J. E., O′Shea, P., Terrill, P., & Reidsema, C. (2016). Don′t blame the student, it′s in their mind: Helping engineering students to grasp complex concepts. In 27th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: AAEE 2016 (p. 565). Southern Cross University.
[55] McDaniel, M. A., Cahill, M. J., Frey, R. F., Rauch, M., Doele, J., Ruvolo, D., & Daschbach, M. M. (2018). Individual Differences in Learning Exemplars versus Abstracting Rules: Associations with Exam Performance in College Science. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
[56] McDaniel, M. A., Cahill, M. J., Frey, R. F., Rauch, M., Doele, J., Ruvolo, D., & Daschbach, M. M. (2018). Individual Differences in Learning Exemplars versus Abstracting Rules: Associations with Exam Performance in College Science. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
[57] McNamara, T., Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2018). Students’ Accounts of Their First-Year Undergraduate Academic Writing Experience: Implications for the Use of the CEFR. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 16-28.
[58] Min, W., Mott, B., & Lester, J. (2014). Adaptive scaffolding in an intelligent game-based learning environment for computer science. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on AI-supported Education for Computer Science (AIEDCS 2014) (pp. 41-50).
[59] Morton, J., & Storch, N. (2018). Developing an authorial voice in PhD multilingual student writing: The reader’s perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing.
[60] Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148.
[61] Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sanchez-Gomez, M. C., Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martin, S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 632-643.
[62] Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98-112.
[63] Poehner, M. E. (2018). Scaffolding and the Development of L2 Grammar. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6.
[64] Rakedzon, T., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. Assessing Writing, 32, 28-42.
[65] Sajid, M., & Siddiqui, J. A. (2015). Lack of Academic Writing skills in English language at Higher Education level in Pakistan: Causes, Effects and Remedies. International journal of language and lingusitics, 2(4), 174.
[66] Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and quantity, 36(1), 43-53.
[67] Sarmany-Schuller, I. (1999). Kognitivne ?tyly a ?tyly u?enia - mo?nosti aplikacie v edukacii (Cognitive and learning styles – possible applications in education), In: SCHOLA 99. Vzdelavanie vysoko?kolskych u?ite?ov. Bratislava.
[68] Sek, Y. W., Law, C. Y., Liew, T. H., Hisham, S. B., Lau, S. H., & Pee, A. N. B. C. (2012). E-assessment as a self-test quiz tool: The setting features and formative use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 737-742.
[69] Sibahi, R. (2015). English Triumphalism in Academic Writing: The Price of Global Visibility. Browser Download This Paper.
[70] Simuth, J., & Sarmany-Schuller, I. (2014). Cognitive style variable in e-learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1464-1467.
[71] Solikhah, I. (2013). English for Academic Purpose Voices: A Survey on Practices and Challenge in the State Universities of Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 121-124.
[72] Somasundaran, S., Burstein, J., & Chodorow, M. (2014). Lexical chaining for measuring discourse coherence quality in test-taker essays. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 950-961).
[73] Steinlen, A. K. (2018). The development of German and English writing skills in a bilingual primary school in Germany. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 42-52.
[74] Sukasame, N., Kantho, S., & Narrot, P. (2014). A Study of Errors in Learning English Grammatical Structures on Tenses of MatthayomSuksa 4 Students of the Demonstration School, KhonKaen University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1934-1939.
[75] Sukumar, P., & Gayathri, K. S. (2014). Semantic based Sentence Ordering Approach for Multi-Document Summarization. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 3(2), 71-76
[76] Sung, Y. T., Liao, C. N., Chang, T. H., Chen, C. L., & Chang, K. E. (2016). The effect of online summary assessment and feedback system on the summary writing on 6th graders: The LSA-based technique. Computers & Education, 95, 1-18.
[77] Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 710-721.
[78] Trisna, B. N., Budayasa, I. K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018, January). Students’ metacognitive activities in solving the combinatorics problem: the experience of students with holist-serialist cognitive style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947, No. 1, p. 012072). IOP Publishing.
[79] Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13.
[80] Velliaris, D. M. (2015). What is academic English ?: Receiving a good grade at the end of the day. Editorial Board, 73.
[81] Wang, W. (2017). Analysis of Writing Errors in Graduation Thesis of English Majors.
[82] Wang, Y., Li, H., Feng, Y., Jiang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2012). Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report. Computers & Education, 59(2), 412-422.
[83] Wildemuth, B. M., Friedman, C. P., & Downs, S. M. (1998). Hypertext versus Boolean access to biomedical information: a comparison of effectiveness, efficiency, and user preferences. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 5(2), 156-183.
[84] Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
[85] Wu, S.-Y., & Hou, H.-T. (2015). How cognitive styles affect the learning behaviors of online problem-solving based discussion activity a lag sequential analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 277-298.
[86] Yang, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2015). China English in trouble: Evidence from dyadic teacher talk. System, 51(3), 9-50.
[87] Yang, L. I. U., Xue, B. A. I., Lei, H. A. N., & Zihan, G. A. O. (2016). A Study of English Listening Barrier and Effective Solutions. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, (emass).
[88] Yang, T. C., Chen, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). The influences of a two-tier test strategy on student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach. Computers & Education, 82, 366-377.
[89] Young, S. S. C., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). The Game Embedded CALL System to Facilitate English Vocabulary Acquisition and Pronunciation. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 239-251.
[90] Zare, J., & Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki, Z. (2017). Genre awareness and academic lecture comprehension: The impact of teaching importance markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 31-41.
[91] Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. (2016). New Ideas on the Design of the Web-Based Learning System Oriented to Problem Solving from the Perspective of Question Chain and Learning Community. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 178-188. |