線上合作知識建構平台的開發與初步評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：61

、訪客IP：18.118.146.46

姓名

戴盛宗(Sheng-Zong Day) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

線上合作知識建構平台的開發與初步評估
(Development and evaluation of the “Collaborative Workspace for Knowledge Building”)

相關論文

★ 支援國小科展探究教與學之網路科展探究系統的開發與評估	★ 教師科展專業知識分享社群平台系統開發與評估
★ 科學小論文寫作平台的建置與評估	★ 「探究教學線上教師社群平台」之建置與評估:以知識管理理論為基礎
★ 科學閱讀平台之發展與評估	★ 以鷹架為基礎之科展探究系統平台之開發與評估
★ Improving Novice Teachers’ Instructional Practice Through Online Multilevel Reflection: The Role of Novice Teachers’ Beliefs	★ The Effect s of Video-based Reflection on Preservice Teachers′ Micro Teaching Focusing on Meaningful Learning with ICT
★ Examining Teachers’ Online Video-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development Regarding Guided-Discovery Learning Instruction	★ 數位教育遊戲之開發與評估：以「Mr.道耳頓的奇幻歷險」為例
★ 應用自然語言處理技術開發基於知識翻新理論之線上非同步合作論證平台與平台初步評估	★ 同步討論與反思系統（SDRS）對小學生知識建構學習環境感知和學習成果的影響
★ 具有集成設計框架的同步在線論證系統用戶界面：重新設計和評估	★ 科學探究學習系統之開發與評估
★ 支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估	★ 線上合作共同備課平台：開發與評估

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

教師在課堂上讓學生們進行小組討論活動，並且學生會在活動過程中主動地思考，如何將自己本身所擁有的或是在討論中學到的知識，以想法的形式呈現並提出以被持續地改進與創新，這個學生進行想法分享與討論的過程，也就是所謂的「知識建構」。但是，學生進行知識建構活動會受到空間與時間的因素所局限，並且很難記錄學生進行知識建構活動的歷程，所以需要設計與開發「線上合作知識建構平台」（Collaborative Workspace for Knowledge Building, 以下簡稱 Co-KF）去解決或改善這些問題，並且附有經過改良與創新的系統架構以及系統工具可供學生使用，因此，能夠促進學生進行知識建構活動的效率。本研究透過學生使用系統給予回饋，研究者再根據回饋的資訊再進一步評估 Co-KF，在進行系統評估時，本研究主要採用調查研究法的問卷調查法，針對 61 名的大學學生進行問卷調查，評估學生對於 Co-KF 的整體知覺有用性、整體知覺易用性、整體使用意願以及知識建構輔助工具的知覺有用性，研究結果發現多數受測學生對於 Co-KF 的整體知覺有用性、整體知覺易用性、整體使用意願以及知識建構輔助工具的知覺有用性，都有給予正面的回饋，覺得 Co-KF 所提供的功能是有用並且容易使用的，最後依據本研究的研究結果，來提出 Co-KF 需要改善的建議，這對於未來改善系統是很重要的參考資料。

摘要(英)

In the classroom, the teacher lets the students conduct group discussion activities, and the students will actively think about how to present the knowledge they have or discuss in the discussion about the presentation of ideas and their proposed ideas are continuously improved and innovated, in which the process of sharing and discussing ideas is called “knowledge building”. However, students′ knowledge building activities are limited by space and time, and it is difficult to record the students′ learning process of knowledge building activities. Therefore, a platform (Collaborative Workspace for Knowledge Building, Co-KF) was established to solve the above problems, and it is accompanied by innovative tools for students to use, so as to promote the efficiency of students′ knowledge building activities. A total of 61 volunteer Taiwanese university students participated in the platform evaluations of Co-KF. The responses on the quantitative questionnaire designed for the platform evaluations in this study showed that overall perceived usefulness, overall perceived ease of use, overall intention to use and perceived usefulness of the tools were positive. They expressed that the functions provided by Co-KF were useful and user-friendly. Finally, from the results of the data analyses, this study proposed suggestions for the improvement on Co-KF, which are important indicators to improve and advance the system in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 協作學習
★ 電腦支援協作學習
★ 知識翻新
★ 知識論壇

關鍵字(英)

★ collaborative learning
★ computer-supported collaborative learning
★ knowledge creation
★ knowledge forum

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 4
第三節研究問題 5
第四節名詞解釋 6
第五節研究限制 7
第二章文獻探討 8
第一節協作學習 8
一、協作學習 8
二、電腦支援協作學習 12
三、小結 13
第二節知識翻新 14
一、知識翻新 14
二、知識翻新與知識論壇 16
三、小結 18
第三節相關系統比較與分析 19
一、相關系統介紹 19
二、系統比較與分析 22
三、小結 24
第四節綜合討論 25
第三章系統設計與實作 26
第一節系統開發方式 26
一、系統開發人員架構 26
二、系統開發流程 27
第二節系統設計 29
一、系統設計之特色 29
二、系統設計規劃 30
三、系統流程設計 30
四、系統使用案例（Use Case） 33
五、系統工具設計 41
第三節系統架構與功能模組 43
一、系統架構 43
二、系統模組與功能說明 44
第四節系統配置 47
一、硬體設備 47
二、軟體設置 47
三、運行環境建議 47
第五節系統介面與角色功能畫面 49
一、系統介面設計 50
二、社群入口區 50
三、知識建構活動區 53
四、知識建構活動輔助工具區 58
第四章研究方法 72
第一節研究對象 72
一、學生使用線上討論社群經驗調查 72
第二節研究流程 73
第三節系統評估流程 75
第四節研究工具 76
一、學生對於「線上合作知識建構平台」之科技接受度量表 76
二、學生對於「線上合作知識建構平台」知識建構輔助工具知覺有用性量表 77
第五節資料收集與分析 79
一、資料收集 79
二、資料分析 79
第五章結果與討論 80
第一節學生對於Co-KF之整體知覺有用性與整體知覺易用性 80
一、整體知覺有用性 81
二、整體知覺易用性 82
三、小結 83
第二節學生對於Co-KF之整體使用意願 84
一、整體使用意願 84
二、小結 85
第三節學生對於Co-KF之知識建構輔助工具的知覺有用性 86
一、知識建構輔助工具有用性於社群想法討論 86
二、小結 92
第六章結論與建議 93
第一節結論 93
一、研究問題統整 93
第二節建議 94
一、對於系統改善方面的建議 94
二、未來研究建議 94
參考文獻 96
附錄 102
附錄一學生背景問卷 102
附錄二學生對於「線上合作知識建構平台」之科技接受度問卷 103
附錄三「線上合作知識建構平台」知識建構輔助工具之知覺有 105

參考文獻

中文部分：
張宇慧（2010）。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響。政治大學教育研究所學位論文，1-88。
洪煌堯、蔡佩真、林倍伊（2014）。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊，22（4），413-439。
袁海球（2004）。透過網上學習社群發展協作學習和知識建構。教育資料與圖書館學，41（4），531-543。

英文部分：
Bereiter, C. （2002）. Education and mind in the knowledge society. In: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C.,＆Scardamalia, M. （2006）. Education for the Knowledge Age: Design-Centered Models of Teaching and Instruction.
Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., Cassells, C.,＆Hewitt, J. （1997）. Postmodernism, knowledge building, and elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 97（4）, 329-340.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A.,＆Duguid, P. （1989）. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18（1）, 32-42.
Brown, T. （2009）. Change by design.
Chan, C. K.,＆Chan, Y.-Y. （2011）. Students′ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers＆Education, 57（1）, 1445-1457.
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2015）. Advancing knowledge‐building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10（4）, 345-366.
Dillenbourg, P. （1999）. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. advances in learning and instruction series: ERIC.
Dillenbourg, P. （1999）. What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P. （2005）. Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication （pp. 243-264）: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A.,＆O′Malley, C. （1995）. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: Elsevier, Oxford.
Dretske, F. （1981）. Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
Drucker, P. F. （1968）. The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing. In: Nueva York, Harper＆Row Society.
Drucker, P. F. （1985）. Innovation and entrepreneurship practices and principles: Amacon.
Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M.,＆Tuttle, R. （2009）. A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46（1）, 3-16.
Hamann, K.,＆Wilson, B. M. （2003）. Beyond search engines: Enhancing active learning using the internet. Politics＆Policy, 31（3）, 533-553.
Hewitt, J. （2004）. An exploration of community in a knowledge forum classroom. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 210-238.
Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F.-C., Chai, C. S.,＆Chan, W.-C. （2011）. Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science, 39（4）, 467-482.
Hong, H.-Y.,＆Sullivan, F. R. （2009）. Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57（5）, 613.
Johnson, D. W.,＆Johnson, F. P. （1991）. Joining together: Group theory and group skills: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Koschmann, T. （2012）. CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm: Routledge.
Lave, J., Wenger, E.,＆Wenger, E. （1991）. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation （Vol. 521423740）: Cambridge university press Cambridge.
Ligorio, B. （1997）. Social influence in a text-based virtual reality. Unpublished master thesis in social psychology.
Machlup, F. （1983）. Semantic quirks in studies of information. The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages, 641-671.
Mason, R.,＆Rennie, F. （2007）. Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and higher education, 10（3）, 196-203.
McMillan, D. W.,＆Chavis, D. M. （1986）. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14（1）, 6-23.
Nonaka, I. （1994）. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5（1）, 14-37.
Osborn, M. （1963）. Studies on the gram-negative cell wall, I. Evidence for the role of 2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate in the lipopolysaccharide of Salmonella typhimurium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 50（3）, 499-506.
Osborn, M. （1967）. Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light‐dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53（2）, 115-126.
Palloff, R. M.,＆Pratt, K. （2010）. Collaborating online: Learning together in community （Vol. 32）: John Wiley＆Sons.
Parnes, S. J. （1967）. Creative behavior guidebook: Scribner.
Perkins, D. N. （1993）. Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 88-110.
Piaget, J. （1971）. Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes.
Popper, K. R. （1972）. Objective knowledge （Vol. 360）: Oxford University Press Oxford.
Popper, K. R.,＆Eccles, J. C. （1977）. The selfand its brain. Sptinget International.
Richards, C. （2005）. The design of effective ICT-supported learning activities: Exemplary models, changing requirements, and new possibilities.
Roschelle, J.,＆Teasley, S. D. （1995）. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the Computer supported collaborative learning.
Rovai, A. P. （2002）. Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and higher education, 5（4）, 319-332.
Scardamalia, M. （2002）. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67-98.
Scardamalia, M. （2004）. CSILE/Knowledge forum®. Education and technology: An encyclopedia, 183, 192.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （1991）. Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the learning sciences, 1（1）, 37-68.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （1994）. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the learning sciences, 3（3）, 265-283.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （1996）. Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational leadership, 54（3）, 6-10.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （1999）. Schools as knowledge-building organizations. Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations, 274-289.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2002）. Knowledge building. Encyclopedia of education （Ed.）. In: New York: Macmillan Reference. Google Scholar.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2003）. Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. Encyclopedia of distributed learning, 269-272.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2006）. Knowledge building. The Cambridge.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2006）. Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology （pp. 97-119）. In: Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. MA: Harvard University Press.
Scardamalia, M.,＆Bereiter, C. （2014）. Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 397-417.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.,＆Lamon, M. （1994）. The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J.,＆Woodruff, E. （1989）. Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of educational computing research, 5（1）, 51-68.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.,＆Steinbach, R. （1984）. Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive science, 8（2）, 173-190.
Smith, B.,＆Bereiter, C. （2002）. Liberal education in a knowledge society: Open Court Publishing.
Smith, B. L.,＆MacGregor, J. T. （1992）. What is collaborative learning. In: Washington.
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E.,＆Donovan, S. S. （1999）. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69（1）, 21-51.
Stahl, G. （2000）. A model of collaborative knowledge-building. Paper presented at the Fourth international conference of the learning sciences.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. D.,＆Suthers, D. D. （2006）. Computer-supported collaborative learning: na.
Tinto, V. （1987）. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition: ERIC.
Tu, C.-H. （2004）. Online collaborative learning communities: Twenty-one designs to building an online collaborative learning community: Libraries Unlimited Westport.
Wu, Y.-T.,＆Wang, L.-J. （2016）. Research trends in technology-enhanced knowledge building pedagogies: a review of selected empirical research from 2006 to 2015. Journal of Computers in Education, 3（3）, 353-375.

指導教授

吳穎沺

審核日期

2018-12-28

推文